Originally posted by Dub J
A six page thread was locked so we could post here?
A six page thread was locked so we could post here?
Forum > Suggestions > Pee Wee Fix-it System! Implement it ASAP
Catch22
offline
offline
fyi I came here on my own (to the Pee Wee suggestions) after reading some discussion about it in another thread in GLB Main. I locked the other threads to have discussion centered on one thread and chose this thread because it was the shortest one and my post would not get lost in the middle of a long thread.
I'll keep reviewing this thread and put something together for Bort to review. It wouldn't go into effect probably for one more season as we'd want to give teams a heads up that the system was changing.
I'll keep reviewing this thread and put something together for Bort to review. It wouldn't go into effect probably for one more season as we'd want to give teams a heads up that the system was changing.
Gerr
offline
offline
Originally posted by dude34
and make peewee twice cheaper
How on earth do my ideas have any impact on the amount of flex one spends on PW, especially the randomizing one? It doesn't effect spending when Gold teams are randomly assigned between the two divisions in Gold and it doesn't effect flex when Silver teams are randomly assigned to a Silver league & division. All it does is changes up who your regular season games will be against, which is where I think things are getting old.
and make peewee twice cheaper
How on earth do my ideas have any impact on the amount of flex one spends on PW, especially the randomizing one? It doesn't effect spending when Gold teams are randomly assigned between the two divisions in Gold and it doesn't effect flex when Silver teams are randomly assigned to a Silver league & division. All it does is changes up who your regular season games will be against, which is where I think things are getting old.
drewd21
offline
offline
Originally posted by Catch22
fyi I came here on my own (to the Pee Wee suggestions) after reading some discussion about it in another thread in GLB Main. I locked the other threads to have discussion centered on one thread and chose this thread because it was the shortest one and my post would not get lost in the middle of a long thread.
I'll keep reviewing this thread and put something together for Bort to review. It wouldn't go into effect probably for one more season as we'd want to give teams a heads up that the system was changing.
Why wasn't this the case regarding the recent announcement about the changes to Cas Pro promotion/demotion?
fyi I came here on my own (to the Pee Wee suggestions) after reading some discussion about it in another thread in GLB Main. I locked the other threads to have discussion centered on one thread and chose this thread because it was the shortest one and my post would not get lost in the middle of a long thread.
I'll keep reviewing this thread and put something together for Bort to review. It wouldn't go into effect probably for one more season as we'd want to give teams a heads up that the system was changing.
Why wasn't this the case regarding the recent announcement about the changes to Cas Pro promotion/demotion?
Edited by drewd21 on Jun 4, 2013 07:57:05
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gerr
What I mean by that is randomize all the teams in Gold between the two divisions, AND randomize all the teams in Silver between the various leagues. So still keep your team in Gold or Silver, but randomize where you will go within that system.
Okay, thought you was suggesting getting rid of the G/S/C set-up. lol
What I mean by that is randomize all the teams in Gold between the two divisions, AND randomize all the teams in Silver between the various leagues. So still keep your team in Gold or Silver, but randomize where you will go within that system.
Okay, thought you was suggesting getting rid of the G/S/C set-up. lol
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by Catch22
fyi I came here on my own (to the Pee Wee suggestions) after reading some discussion about it in another thread in GLB Main. I locked the other threads to have discussion centered on one thread and chose this thread because it was the shortest one and my post would not get lost in the middle of a long thread.
I'll keep reviewing this thread and put something together for Bort to review. It wouldn't go into effect probably for one more season as we'd want to give teams a heads up that the system was changing.
I think what you came up with is good. Just please reconsider the amount of teams that promote to Gold every season imo.
fyi I came here on my own (to the Pee Wee suggestions) after reading some discussion about it in another thread in GLB Main. I locked the other threads to have discussion centered on one thread and chose this thread because it was the shortest one and my post would not get lost in the middle of a long thread.
I'll keep reviewing this thread and put something together for Bort to review. It wouldn't go into effect probably for one more season as we'd want to give teams a heads up that the system was changing.
I think what you came up with is good. Just please reconsider the amount of teams that promote to Gold every season imo.
Originally posted by drewd21
Why wasn't this the case regarding the recent announcement about the changes to Cas Pro promotion/demotion?
It Was the case.... did you not see the thread? http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5076112
Most of us that posted there are Casual Owners.
Why wasn't this the case regarding the recent announcement about the changes to Cas Pro promotion/demotion?
It Was the case.... did you not see the thread? http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5076112
Most of us that posted there are Casual Owners.
Originally posted by Gerr
How on earth do my ideas have any impact on the amount of flex one spends on PW, especially the randomizing one? It doesn't effect spending when Gold teams are randomly assigned between the two divisions in Gold and it doesn't effect flex when Silver teams are randomly assigned to a Silver league & division. All it does is changes up who your regular season games will be against, which is where I think things are getting old.
I mean it as addition to your plan
How on earth do my ideas have any impact on the amount of flex one spends on PW, especially the randomizing one? It doesn't effect spending when Gold teams are randomly assigned between the two divisions in Gold and it doesn't effect flex when Silver teams are randomly assigned to a Silver league & division. All it does is changes up who your regular season games will be against, which is where I think things are getting old.
I mean it as addition to your plan
No need to make it cheaper... its only 400 flex/season if you are a non-boosting team... which, if you look at Pee Wee, alot of them are.
Also, The only reason I would see to change the price is to see it go up, since the amount of teams available would go down. AKA... Supply and Demand. BUT.... nothing should happen to the price.
Also, The only reason I would see to change the price is to see it go up, since the amount of teams available would go down. AKA... Supply and Demand. BUT.... nothing should happen to the price.
Originally posted by Cleveland Browns
Also, The only reason I would see to change the price is to see it go up, since the amount of teams available would go down. AKA... Supply and Demand. BUT.... nothing should happen to the price.
what
Also, The only reason I would see to change the price is to see it go up, since the amount of teams available would go down. AKA... Supply and Demand. BUT.... nothing should happen to the price.
what
Droidinc21
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cleveland Browns
No need to make it cheaper... its only 400 flex/season if you are a non-boosting team... which, if you look at Pee Wee, alot of them are.
Also, The only reason I would see to change the price is to see it go up, since the amount of teams available would go down. AKA... Supply and Demand. BUT.... nothing should happen to the price.
IRL: If something isn't selling, the demand isn't high enough, so you either lower the supply to match the demand, or lower the cost to increase demand.
L2economics
No need to make it cheaper... its only 400 flex/season if you are a non-boosting team... which, if you look at Pee Wee, alot of them are.
Also, The only reason I would see to change the price is to see it go up, since the amount of teams available would go down. AKA... Supply and Demand. BUT.... nothing should happen to the price.
IRL: If something isn't selling, the demand isn't high enough, so you either lower the supply to match the demand, or lower the cost to increase demand.
L2economics
Originally posted by Droidinc21
IRL: If something isn't selling, the demand isn't high enough, so you either lower the supply to match the demand, or lower the cost to increase demand.
L2economics
IRL: If something isn't selling, the demand isn't high enough, so you either lower the supply to match the demand, or lower the cost to increase demand.
L2economics
drewd21
offline
offline
Originally posted by 1hottie
It Was the case.... did you not see the thread? http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5076112
Most of us that posted there are Casual Owners.
But that change was announced 2 games in to the current ssn for next ssn, regarding the Pee Wee system Catch is saying they will have a look at it now and give owners the whole of next ssn before any change is bought about
It Was the case.... did you not see the thread? http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5076112
Most of us that posted there are Casual Owners.
But that change was announced 2 games in to the current ssn for next ssn, regarding the Pee Wee system Catch is saying they will have a look at it now and give owners the whole of next ssn before any change is bought about
Originally posted by Droidinc21
IRL: If something isn't selling, the demand isn't high enough, so you either lower the supply to match the demand, or lower the cost to increase demand.
L2economics
You are right you do ONE or THE OTHER... I am saying to lower the amount of teams....
If you read, Dude wants both (which isn't needed)
No need to troll my post simply because you want to be an ass...
IRL: If something isn't selling, the demand isn't high enough, so you either lower the supply to match the demand, or lower the cost to increase demand.
L2economics
You are right you do ONE or THE OTHER... I am saying to lower the amount of teams....
If you read, Dude wants both (which isn't needed)
No need to troll my post simply because you want to be an ass...
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
