Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Dr. E
Since I'm saying it is true, then it is unless

*bzzzz*
wrong

Never argue with jd.

When he's right he's right.

When he's wrong...


he's still somehow right.

I love it.

Originally posted by Dr. E
Since I'm saying it is true, then it is unless you can prove the facts my statement rests on are flawed, which you haven't, you don't even know them so I assume you are making statements based on your perceptions. There's one thing about perceptions, they are rarely based on fact. Instead based on ones experiences and if those experiences don't include all the facts, then they are flawed.
I'll explain this a different way and hopefully you'll understand. The big difference between a Run Blocker archetype and a Pass Blocker archetype is that the former has strength as a major and agility as a minor while the latter has the opposite. Ok, so our theoretical top level run blocker OT has 106 strength and 93 agility. Most OTs of that kind at that level are putting one piece of AEQ in agility to help counter Technique Man (plus agility is more important than strength for pass blocking). So the run blocker has 148 strength (+42) and 106 agility (+13). A pass blocker with the identical player value and EL would have 93 strength and 106 agility. If you put all equipment in strength then what do you end up with? 148 strength (+55) and 106 agility.

Originally posted by Dr. E
Since I'm saying it is true, then it is unless you can prove the facts my statement rests on are flawed, which you haven't, you don't even know them so I assume you are making statements based on your perceptions. There's one thing about perceptions, they are rarely based on fact. Instead based on ones experiences and if those experiences don't include all the facts, then they are flawed.

lolwut?

HE SAID SINCE I'M SAYING IT IS TRUE, THEN IT IS UNLESS YOU CAN PROVE THE FACTS MY STATEMENTS RESTS ON ARE FLAWED.

Originally posted by Dub J
HE SAID SINCE I'M SAYING IT IS TRUE, THEN IT IS UNLESS YOU CAN PROVE THE FACTS MY STATEMENTS RESTS ON ARE FLAWED.

Saying something is true doesn't make it true. Not even close.

However, saying something is true over and over again while adding in more and more personal insults with each repetition -- that makes it true.

urdoinitwrong, Dr. E.

Originally posted by Novus
Saying something is true doesn't make it true. Not even close.

However, saying something is true over and over again while adding in more and more personal insults with each repetition -- that makes it true.

urdoinitwrong, Dr. E.
Please cry more.

Originally posted by jdbolick

Please cry more.

That's why I PM'ed you, so you'd have the chance to make me cry more. Not my fault you haven't replied.

I am vastly more intelligent than all of you (especially jd). That is why I don't bother arguing with you. It's a waste of my time.

Originally posted by Dub J
I am vastly more intelligent than all of you (especially jd). That is why I don't bother arguing with you. It's a waste of my time.

If you want, I can send you a GreaseMonkey script that changes jdbolick's avatar from Cam Newton to Comic Book Guy. His posts are a lot funnier in that guy's voice.

Originally posted by Novus
If you want, I can send you a GreaseMonkey script that changes jdbolick's avatar from Cam Newton to Comic Book Guy. His posts are a lot funnier in that guy's voice.

now I gotta go back and reread the thread in an entirely different voice....

Originally posted by HOODjelly
now I gotta go back and reread the thread in an entirely different voice....

Why, whose voice were you using before? Charlton Heston?

Guess all my OLinemen have been shit for a while and now I know why... thanks for getting to the bottom of this Dr. E.