Originally posted by greengoose
The only problem is that kind of decision-making is pretty much impossible to model in a game like this.
The only problem is that kind of decision-making is pretty much impossible to model in a game like this.
Forum > Suggestions > Eliminate Throw Aways from Inside the Pocket
Still waiting on Mike Rogers explanation on why GLB feels this is essential code in the game that brings the user base a tremendous value.
Deathblade
offline
offline
Originally posted by Alky
The mods, admins, and testers should just stop posting. Well maybe not mods, they should just not argue.
Nothing like arguing with your paying customers.
I dont care if your on the payroll or not your still a representative.
Such a whiny copout.
The mods, admins, and testers should just stop posting. Well maybe not mods, they should just not argue.
Nothing like arguing with your paying customers.
I dont care if your on the payroll or not your still a representative.
Such a whiny copout.
Skoll Wolfrun
offline
offline
I agree. Although the overall reason the Throw Away as it is now is because too many people bitched and moaned how their 'great QB' kept tossing the ball into an INT on a Throw Away attempt.
Originally posted by Skoll Wolfrun
I agree. Although the overall reason the Throw Away as it is now is because too many people bitched and moaned how their 'great QB' kept tossing the ball into an INT on a Throw Away attempt.
Could be...but INTs and sacks are a good part of the game unless all you do is OC and/or build offense. It is certainly prefered over a throwaway, which just adds to the boredom.
I think it would be a move in a positive direction to just allow a QB to avoid throwaways completely using individual tactics. I thought that was the intention to begin with, but apparently QBs are throwing the ball away even when their tactics are set be aggressive with the ball.
I still believe it doesn't make football sense most of the time but I'm willing to concede that point. I will never concede that throwaways are beneficial, particularly when setting are dictating not to do it.
I agree. Although the overall reason the Throw Away as it is now is because too many people bitched and moaned how their 'great QB' kept tossing the ball into an INT on a Throw Away attempt.
Could be...but INTs and sacks are a good part of the game unless all you do is OC and/or build offense. It is certainly prefered over a throwaway, which just adds to the boredom.
I think it would be a move in a positive direction to just allow a QB to avoid throwaways completely using individual tactics. I thought that was the intention to begin with, but apparently QBs are throwing the ball away even when their tactics are set be aggressive with the ball.
I still believe it doesn't make football sense most of the time but I'm willing to concede that point. I will never concede that throwaways are beneficial, particularly when setting are dictating not to do it.
dahman32
offline
offline
Originally posted by T♠2♠
I think it would be a move in a positive direction to just allow a QB to avoid throwaways completely using individual tactics. I thought that was the intention to begin with, but apparently QBs are throwing the ball away even when their tactics are set be aggressive with the ball.
...
I will never concede that throwaways are beneficial, particularly when setting are dictating not to do it.
I think it would be a move in a positive direction to just allow a QB to avoid throwaways completely using individual tactics. I thought that was the intention to begin with, but apparently QBs are throwing the ball away even when their tactics are set be aggressive with the ball.
...
I will never concede that throwaways are beneficial, particularly when setting are dictating not to do it.
ManOgwaR
offline
offline
Originally posted by Skoll Wolfrun
I agree. Although the overall reason the Throw Away as it is now is because too many people bitched and moaned how their 'great QB' kept tossing the ball into an INT on a Throw Away attempt.
bishes!
I agree. Although the overall reason the Throw Away as it is now is because too many people bitched and moaned how their 'great QB' kept tossing the ball into an INT on a Throw Away attempt.
bishes!
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
As a lover of defenses, I LOVE
This idea!!! This means the QB's will be holding onto the ball much longer thereby allowing my guys to record more sacks! Sweet! +10 GRAND!XD
You do realize that if it did result in more sacks, bort would just nerf the pass rush back down to where it was a wash and all this arguing would be about replay text.
As a lover of defenses, I LOVE
This idea!!! This means the QB's will be holding onto the ball much longer thereby allowing my guys to record more sacks! Sweet! +10 GRAND!XDYou do realize that if it did result in more sacks, bort would just nerf the pass rush back down to where it was a wash and all this arguing would be about replay text.
Originally posted by Fumanchuchu
You do realize that if it did result in more sacks, bort would just nerf the pass rush back down to where it was a wash and all this arguing would be about replay text.
Then I'll equip my defensive players with hand grenades. One way or another I'm-a-gonna blow me up some QB's!
You do realize that if it did result in more sacks, bort would just nerf the pass rush back down to where it was a wash and all this arguing would be about replay text.
Then I'll equip my defensive players with hand grenades. One way or another I'm-a-gonna blow me up some QB's!
Notak
offline
offline
Originally posted by High Demand
Throw Aways from Inside the Pocket is working as intended.Leave it alone!
No.
I am sure they are working as intended but it is still intentional grounding.
Throw Aways from Inside the Pocket is working as intended.Leave it alone!
No.
I am sure they are working as intended but it is still intentional grounding.
Tajson
offline
offline
Originally posted by toobad4u_00
The bug moderators are making me really sad. Do they understand the game of football. Perhaps it is not a prerequisite, but it might be beneficial.
Is this the NFL?
The bug moderators are making me really sad. Do they understand the game of football. Perhaps it is not a prerequisite, but it might be beneficial.
Is this the NFL?
ron2288
offline
offline
Originally posted by High Demand
Throw Aways from Inside the Pocket is working as intended.Leave it alone!
you will look better if you do not post
Throw Aways from Inside the Pocket is working as intended.Leave it alone!
you will look better if you do not post
Gambler75
offline
offline
Originally posted by The unknown Grey Jedi
Is this the NFL?
Okay ... Is this rugby? Badmitton?
At what level of football outside the NFL, is that NOT considered grounding?
The reward of throwing the ball away and robbing the D of a sack, has to have the risk of needing to throw it near a receiver and possibly getting picked IMO.
How many times have you seen a QB just as he's getting hit, try to throw it away / to a short receiver and put a wobbly ugly duckling in the air that a LB picks off. Bledsoe was classic for those ...
Is this the NFL?
Okay ... Is this rugby? Badmitton?
At what level of football outside the NFL, is that NOT considered grounding?
The reward of throwing the ball away and robbing the D of a sack, has to have the risk of needing to throw it near a receiver and possibly getting picked IMO.
How many times have you seen a QB just as he's getting hit, try to throw it away / to a short receiver and put a wobbly ugly duckling in the air that a LB picks off. Bledsoe was classic for those ...
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
