Warrior General Games

Say what you want, but what I stated earlier was proven in this post...


Originally posted by GroovyCheetah
unrelated but choosing were to blitz would be nice in casual in defense blitz left % Blitz Middle % blitz right % and blitz balanced or random what ever glb calls it

+1

the only actual thing you can do in Casual is set your depth and % of pass/run with a 78% margin of error.

So...playbook control would be great.

Yes, I own both regular and casual, wondering why in the hell I bought a casual team

Originally posted by dusk883
+1

the only actual thing you can do in Casual is set your depth and % of pass/run with a 78% margin of error.

So...playbook control would be great.

Yes, I own both regular and casual, wondering why in the hell I bought a casual team


I've owned casual teams since the league type was introduced. I said it back then and I'll say it again...casual league should have been just like the regular leagues but without custom slots and the DPC.

Well, actually I said that shortly after the DPC was introduced but ya know.

That guy off shipping wars looks identical to an old manager I had at the bar.

I wondered if that show is legit or fake like most all other reality shows.

Truth is, the OP wouldn't work in many cases.

The reason being that some formations selected for use in the playbook are more pass or run heavy than others. As a result, playcall is weighted accordingly within the formation. That's also why percentages entered into the AI often are not adequately reflected within the stats. It's difficult to run a balanced offense when the formations selected have few WRs for passes or lack rushing plays to the outside.

This is why the Presets already have the OP factored in - so you don't need to make a suggestion here asking for a new - and not very practicable - addition to Casual AI. Otherwise, the next step would be custom playbooks, and we know that's NGTH.

-1 to OP....from a Casual user

Originally posted by PhillyFossil
Truth is, the OP wouldn't work in many cases.

The reason being that some formations selected for use in the playbook are more pass or run heavy than others. As a result, playcall is weighted accordingly within the formation. That's also why percentages entered into the AI often are not adequately reflected within the stats. It's difficult to run a balanced offense when the formations selected have few WRs for passes or lack rushing plays to the outside.

This is why the Presets already have the OP factored in - so you don't need to make a suggestion here asking for a new - and not very practicable - addition to Casual AI. Otherwise, the next step would be custom playbooks, and we know that's NGTH.

-1 to OP....from a Casual user



100% basic playbook... in this case your problem is solved.
BTW... those who use presets.. do, those that don't use presets.. don't

"Presets have this built in, so why is it we cannot have this as an exclusive option that would be used via percentages as like the playbook formations?"

In other words, this only happens when using presets. So it's either, use funky presets and get this option, or don't use presets and pass on 3rd and inches when you have it as a 50/50 run/pass split.

Here we are on page 4 and there have only been 4 people in favor of this suggestion.

Originally posted by Dub J
Here we are on page 4 and there have only been 4 people in favor of this suggestion.

You counting? Good man

I probably should count the people against it. I would estimate that's around 7 or 8.

Originally posted by Dub J
I probably should count the people against it. I would estimate that's around 7 or 8.

That's good too, count on
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XD3PMrMMk5M

Originally posted by Dub J
I probably should count the people against it. I would estimate that's around 7 or 8.

Oh lordy lord! Please don't anyone else vote against this thread!!! Cuz then Dubbie would have to take his shoes off to keep on counting. (jes jazzin ya, Dubya.)

+1 If the defense would be able to have matching settings that worked.