Warrior General Games

Originally posted by merenoise
Quality post.

3 times the amount of real life would be just fine with me, in a game where you pay to see your dots do something it is always nice when they, you know, do something...

What, you mean spending 60 dollars to see your dot get an interception once a season isn't worth it?

Are you mad?

Originally posted by Ken1
Originally posted by John Hinckley, Jr.

Don't worry about Ken1. He is a proven liar with no credibility.

That's how you've painted me with your stalking, when you're the one who's lied about me, and in many other cases distorted my views.

Mr. Hinckley is projecting.

Some people can disagree with me politely, but you certainly are not one of them.

I politely disagree with people who have differences of opinion on the forums all the time. Many of them eventually even end up playing on my teams. My mother once told me however that it is useless to argue with a crazy person. They will not listen to reason and so I have no need to be polite with you since it wouldn't help with your disorder.

You got caught lying again today:

Originally posted by Ken1
I supported coaches, and I know that's unpopular especially now, but wow are you lying about Zone Specialist. I suggested the VA, because man defense had Shutdown Corner, and zone defense had nothing comparable. I had left before it was nerfed by making it an SA instead of a VA, and would have opposed that happening had I been here. I've been constantly trying to get zone defense improved to be overall somewhere near as good as man defense, both before and after my period away.

When you were one of the testers who actually was pushing for it to be nerfed for linebackers.

Originally posted by Ken1

ZS not working for LB's is necessary because teams would get all their defenders (besides the linemen) to max ZS, and they'd be way too powerful as zone teams.

Zones in general aren't overpowered (IMO; some testers think they are), but zones with LB's having ZS maxed are.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3284999&page=1#28574426

Like I said earlier, you have 0 credibility and I genuinely feel sorry for you. It can't be easy to be a pathological liar with obsessive compulsive disorder that makes you argue with everyone in every thread you enter if they don't share your misguided belief that the NFL is the only type of football that is relevant to GLB and that realism is somehow something to strive for.

Please by all means continuing bumping my thread and keep it on page 1. Suggestions without a troll or two die on the vine even if they have merit.

Originally posted by merenoise
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3284999&page=1#28574426

Like I said earlier, you have 0 credibility and I genuinely feel sorry for you. It can't be easy to be a pathological liar with obsessive compulsive disorder that makes you argue with everyone in every thread you enter if they don't share your misguided belief that the NFL is the only type of football that is relevant to GLB and that realism is somehow something to strive for.

Please by all means continuing bumping my thread and keep it on page 1. Suggestions without a troll or two die on the vine even if they have merit.

He even tries to throw me under the bus for his shit opinions.

Damn.

Originally posted by merenoise
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3284999&page=1#28574426

Like I said earlier, you have 0 credibility and I genuinely feel sorry for you. It can't be easy to be a pathological liar with obsessive compulsive disorder

False, and false.

Originally posted by merenoise
your misguided belief that the NFL is the only type of football that is relevant to GLB

A lie that you know is a lie, as I've made clear I'd be glad to consider college football stats equally if someone points me to a site that has them to the extent NFL stats are available.

Originally posted by merenoise
and that realism is somehow something to strive for.

Of course, in a football sim, realism should be something to strive for.

Originally posted by merenoise
Please by all means continuing bumping my thread and keep it on page 1. Suggestions without a troll or two die on the vine even if they have merit.

I actually agree with your first proposed VA (interception bonuses when in zone defense), so that doesn't bother me that much.

Originally posted by Deathblade
Originally posted by merenoise

Quality post.

3 times the amount of real life would be just fine with me, in a game where you pay to see your dots do something it is always nice when they, you know, do something...

What, you mean spending 60 dollars to see your dot get an interception once a season isn't worth it?

Are you mad?

A little mad. More for other people than me, none of my secondary dots have builds that are geared towards interceptions. Still it would be nice to at least have the option of trying to build for that.

Originally posted by Deathblade
He even tries to throw me under the bus for his shit opinions.

Damn.

Dude has issues. I hope he gets help.

+1 to OP

+1

When did Hatch & Loyello buy Merenoise & Ken1's accounts?

yep! +1

Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs
When did Hatch & Loyello buy Merenoise & Ken1's accounts?

2 weeks ago.

Originally posted by Deathblade
He even tries to throw me under the bus for his shit opinions.

Damn.

All could be avoided if only you had accepted GM offer from Jazz Cats.

Originally posted by All American Dude
All could be avoided if only you had accepted GM offer from Jazz Cats.

That's the Truth, Truth

Originally posted by Deathblade
What, you mean spending 60 dollars to see your dot get an interception once a season isn't worth it?

Are you mad?

One interception a season would be low even for a mediocre build on a CB. Do you mean one Pick Six (which is about right for a well built CB for a season)? Along with of course, several non-Pick Six interceptions, and a lot of deflections, maybe KLs depending on how you build, and tackles?

Yeah, that's plenty when you think about it.

I don't know what will happen with fumble returns; but when there were practically no fumble returns for over a dozen seasons and no real reason to believe it was going to be changed, people still made force fumble builds, because forcing turnovers is always a lot of fun, returned or not.

And scarcity makes things more exciting when they do happen.

Originally posted by Ken1
Originally posted by Deathblade

What, you mean spending 60 dollars to see your dot get an interception once a season isn't worth it?

Are you mad?

And scarcity makes things more exciting when they do happen.

So QBs should only get a passing TD every other game? I mean since we are making completely specious arguments I felt like it made sense to take your argument to its logical end. Since scarcity is so swell we should diminish the ability of any dot to do anything right?

Originally posted by merenoise
So QBs should only get a passing TD every other game? I mean since we are making completely specious arguments I felt like it made sense to take your argument to its logical end. Since scarcity is so swell we should diminish the ability of any dot to do anything right?



No, everyone should get about what players at their position get-- more if a good build, less if a bad build.

I'm just saying a reason we get so excited in rl when we see a pick taken to the house is that it doesn't happen often. A better analogy is that QBs should only throw a TD pass that goes more than 30 yards in the air every two games or so, probably.

You talk about me as if I have such awful problems. I'd say that you do, to the extent you go to harass me. This post wasn't a particularly bad one, but in some posts you've gone to great lengths to slander me. I don't want to know who you are in rl, but if I did, I'd have the grounds for a hell of a lawsuit.