Warrior General Games

Originally posted by SG✬21
Please link me to a CB that actually has all of that...

Also you don't want 80 agility you want 90+ same with vision usually...

For someone that hasn't really done much on the game you sure act like you know a shit ton about building and what should be relevant ect..

I agree that catching should have an effect but it should be minimal

i was including VA's

Originally posted by Diamond Spade
i was including VA's

I bet your planning to use VAs just to get attribute bonuses.. You just failed at building.

Either way that build isn't possible.

50+ catching on a CB is a waste. Once you learn how to build come talk to me.

Originally posted by Diamond Spade
not really u can have a cb with 150 spd and 80+ in jumping vision catching and agility with 10 in SH SV and SDC.

if u want more spd or vision then just take 10 from catching add it there. you will still have at least 70 catching

ur right bout vision checks though but u still have to catch it once u get there which is my main argument for making catching more relevant.

lol why would you go with 10 in SH? Do you know how to build a CB at all? Plus you need tackling and that has to be higher than 70 for a CB to make tackles consistently

i could of done it with my cb but i was noob enough to put points into SA early in my build and i didnt take spd pass the 81 cap. when i make my next round of cbs. i wont make that mistake.

the three attributes that will past 80 naturally will be spd vision and agility.


my cb right now is more of a zone corner now hes to slow to play man well esp with the ball hawk nerf.

Originally posted by SG✬21
lol why would you go with 10 in SH? Do you know how to build a CB at all? Plus you need tackling and that has to be higher than 70 for a CB to make tackles consistently

u cant have everything

Originally posted by Diamond Spade
u cant have everything

u have to choose what u want to excel at

with INTs down and catching not playing a role in INTs im not sure why you would even consider focusing there.

In my sig, I DC that team. That has a bunch of elite CBs and most never even touched catching.

Here's the thing, even if they did buff INTs you won't get one every single game, i guarantee that. So is it worth it that the once every few games the increased catching and decreases in attributes else where worth it?

No, the ball will be passed your way a lot and you want to have a shut down corner not and INT specialist that could intercept it once every couple games. If he lacks important coverage attributes then the build is a complete waste.

This is assuming your in a competitive league where the games are close. ie no blowouts where INTs can happen 24/7.

Your willing to sacrifice the ability to deflect passes and defend the pass more for the small chance you have an opportunity to intercept the ball.

Originally posted by SG✬21
lol why would you go with 10 in SH? Do you know how to build a CB at all? Plus you need tackling and that has to be higher than 70 for a CB to make tackles consistently

im aware that if ur tackling is below 70 rb will brake ur tackles on regular basis and accepted. i dont get mad when my cb miss tackles on rbs because i didnt invest in tackling.

Originally posted by Diamond Spade
im aware that if ur tackling is below 70 rb will brake ur tackles on regular basis and accepted. i dont get mad when my cb miss tackles on rbs because i didnt invest in tackling.

What is wrong with you? Im not happy when a CB misses an open field tackle that leads to a huge gain.

You've done nothing with the game but i would have thought that you would have realized that tackling is important. How else are you supposed to do anything on defense if you cant tackle?

If you need someone to help you will building a player let me know because you need some help

Originally posted by SG✬21
with INTs down and catching not playing a role in INTs im not sure why you would even consider focusing there.

In my sig, I DC that team. That has a bunch of elite CBs and most never even touched catching.

Here's the thing, even if they did buff INTs you won't get one every single game, i guarantee that. So is it worth it that the once every few games the increased catching and decreases in attributes else where worth it?

No, the ball will be passed your way a lot and you want to have a shut down corner not and INT specialist that could intercept it once every couple games. If he lacks important coverage attributes then the build is a complete waste.

This is assuming your in a competitive league where the games are close. ie no blowouts where INTs can happen 24/7.

Your willing to sacrifice the ability to deflect passes and defend the pass more for the small chance you have an opportunity to intercept the ball.

u make good points i was just experimenting. i think i can increase the odds of ints by making a secondary built like that or least 3 cbs. of course teh they wont be identical. one cb will have more of one attribute then other. since qb like to throw into double/triple coverage alot. if all those defenders have 70 catching then it safe to say i can aspect 1 int a game not by teh same person of course but u get what i mean.

Originally posted by SG✬21
What is wrong with you? Im not happy when a CB misses an open field tackle that leads to a huge gain.

You've done nothing with the game but i would have thought that you would have realized that tackling is important. How else are you supposed to do anything on defense if you cant tackle?

maybe i use the wrong word i dont rage when my cb misses a tackle from a rb cuz its explainable.

43 tackles out of 68 attempts for a cb with less than 70 tackling on a bad team.

tackling or lack of tackling on a cb are game changers. it the end it depends on the scheme. tackling on a cb make a dc job easier. they dont have to compensate.

if u make ur int catching secondary no one will pass on u they wouldnt have to they will just run u to death and then when they finaly pass ur def will be all tired and useless just imo though

Originally posted by SG✬21
lol why would you go with 10 in SH? Do you know how to build a CB at all? Plus you need tackling and that has to be higher than 70 for a CB to make tackles consistently

I agree that as the game is currently set up SH is a wasted SA for a defensive player. But I don't think it should be that way or was meant to be that way. I'd hope that Catching and SH could be made to have a strong impact on interception chances.

And then people would have to choose between a CB being good at tackling or a top-level coverage man. If that were true, we might see an increase in the viability of outside runs.