Originally posted by yello1
This misses the point that having a team period is helpful to GLB.
Teams that serve as homes for the badly built dots are still making Bort money.
The whole idea to reward a long term paying customer. Not as another avenue of competition.
Go back and read my previous post regarding how GLB actually loses money if a team is owned by the same person for multiple seasons. That's not even delving into the issue of cost of boosting players vs. owning a team. If people want recognition for X amount of wins or such I have no real problem with it. Just trying to get it through peoples skulls that the whole flex argument needs to be dropped.
For just under $65 you can own a team for 20 seasons (less if you include all the times we received bonus flex). So you're telling me that someone that spent less than $100 should be given a break while people like me that have spent around $1000 shouldn't get squat? Seems like a pretty shitty business model, tbh.
This misses the point that having a team period is helpful to GLB.
Teams that serve as homes for the badly built dots are still making Bort money.
The whole idea to reward a long term paying customer. Not as another avenue of competition.
Go back and read my previous post regarding how GLB actually loses money if a team is owned by the same person for multiple seasons. That's not even delving into the issue of cost of boosting players vs. owning a team. If people want recognition for X amount of wins or such I have no real problem with it. Just trying to get it through peoples skulls that the whole flex argument needs to be dropped.
For just under $65 you can own a team for 20 seasons (less if you include all the times we received bonus flex). So you're telling me that someone that spent less than $100 should be given a break while people like me that have spent around $1000 shouldn't get squat? Seems like a pretty shitty business model, tbh.
Edited by All American Dude on Feb 3, 2012 21:59:26
