Sounds good to me! +1 
Forum > Suggestions > Epic Suggestions > Allow someone to SEND the contract on day 41, just don't let the dot sign it.
TrevJo
offline
offline
What about contracts that were sent before the end of day 40, and the agent realizes on day 41 he needs to sign it. I would still like for him to be able to sign in that case, but I worry that making the change in the OP would prevent this.
Red Sox
offline
offline
Originally posted by TrevJo
What about contracts that were sent before the end of day 40, and the agent realizes on day 41 he needs to sign it. I would still like for him to be able to sign in that case, but I worry that making the change in the OP would prevent this.
You can't do anything on day 41 anyways. You can't SIGN anyone on day 41. so regardless, it is easier for Owners. It doesn't change crap for the players.
What about contracts that were sent before the end of day 40, and the agent realizes on day 41 he needs to sign it. I would still like for him to be able to sign in that case, but I worry that making the change in the OP would prevent this.
You can't do anything on day 41 anyways. You can't SIGN anyone on day 41. so regardless, it is easier for Owners. It doesn't change crap for the players.
-1 you'd just be getting around something.
Rule is in place to keep recruiting fair once team moves are complete. Without the team moves finished team could theoretically send contracts to players one day and demote at roll over and have players above the cap signed.
Rule is in place to keep recruiting fair once team moves are complete. Without the team moves finished team could theoretically send contracts to players one day and demote at roll over and have players above the cap signed.
Originally posted by Chysil
up for voting
Seems like I have witnessed far better suggestions with more support that never get to a vote. We all know that anything that typically goes for a vote has a resounding Yes v. No vote anyways.
up for voting
Seems like I have witnessed far better suggestions with more support that never get to a vote. We all know that anything that typically goes for a vote has a resounding Yes v. No vote anyways.
Red Sox
offline
offline
Originally posted by P@nda
-1 you'd just be getting around something.
Rule is in place to keep recruiting fair once team moves are complete. Without the team moves finished team could theoretically send contracts to players one day and demote at roll over and have players above the cap signed.
If I send a contract, then my team moves. The player isn't allowed to SIGN IT till day 42. Like everyone else. So I don't see this loop hole your talking about
-1 you'd just be getting around something.
Rule is in place to keep recruiting fair once team moves are complete. Without the team moves finished team could theoretically send contracts to players one day and demote at roll over and have players above the cap signed.
If I send a contract, then my team moves. The player isn't allowed to SIGN IT till day 42. Like everyone else. So I don't see this loop hole your talking about
Gigolo Johnny D
offline
offline
Originally posted by P@nda
-1 you'd just be getting around something.
Rule is in place to keep recruiting fair once team moves are complete. Without the team moves finished team could theoretically send contracts to players one day and demote at roll over and have players above the cap signed.
When you demote players out of the age range are automatically removed from the roster. This objection makes no sense and clouds the issue with misinformation.
-1 you'd just be getting around something.
Rule is in place to keep recruiting fair once team moves are complete. Without the team moves finished team could theoretically send contracts to players one day and demote at roll over and have players above the cap signed.
When you demote players out of the age range are automatically removed from the roster. This objection makes no sense and clouds the issue with misinformation.
Red Sox
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gigolo Johnny D
When you demote players out of the age range are automatically removed from the roster. This objection makes no sense and clouds the issue with misinformation.
THANK YOU.
When you demote players out of the age range are automatically removed from the roster. This objection makes no sense and clouds the issue with misinformation.
THANK YOU.
Although this is a good suggestion, I ponder why it's not even simpler... as such; Any team (those with the ability) that wishes can send out a contract at any time to an agent (NOT the dot), securing the rights for 1 (or more) dot(s) that that agent has or agrees to build. This contract is between Teams and Agents... not dots... so no code-rewrite or adjustment needs be made. The Team specifies what it wants in the same manner as a dot is signed... except it's a contract with the agent. The Agent then chooses to accept or decline the offer. If the offer is accepted, then the agent goes to his "Dots" and, where you put an agent on the market, simply chooses an added line, "Player is NOT available." This would make the player/dot NOT appear on ANYONE'S list when searching for players. At any time such a contract can be null and voided making the DOT once again a "free agent" open to anyone to sign.
+1 to the title anyways.
+1 to the title anyways.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
