or your dot sucks
Forum > North American Pro League > Canada Conference > OVer Under - How many FF will I get this season....
ryan_grant-25
offline
offline
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Ryan Grant this is for you....Since you think my players suck
where u at???
Ryan Grant this is for you....Since you think my players suck
where u at???
Triathlon Dude
offline
offline
Originally posted by ryan_grant-25
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Ryan Grant this is for you....Since you think my players suck
where u at???
Cussing out Bort for making an inferior product that i pay to play.......
I am hoping to find out this offseason how fubar Power Tackling is.......
I am running an experiment against one team for 6 games..... 3 on Power, 3 on Balanced (going to try for all LB's) and see what the miss tackle to FF ratio turns out to be.
I am thinking that Balanced will have a better ratio, and that both Balanced and Power will have the same number of FF's.
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Ryan Grant this is for you....Since you think my players suck
where u at???
Cussing out Bort for making an inferior product that i pay to play.......
I am hoping to find out this offseason how fubar Power Tackling is.......
I am running an experiment against one team for 6 games..... 3 on Power, 3 on Balanced (going to try for all LB's) and see what the miss tackle to FF ratio turns out to be.
I am thinking that Balanced will have a better ratio, and that both Balanced and Power will have the same number of FF's.
Charles Fridholm
offline
offline
Originally posted by TrevJo
5
not over/under but he guessed correctly
5 out of 29 for a FFUM... around 17% of your tackles is a fumble...
last season you were at 12%
season before that at almost 21%
seems to be nothing wrong, you need to make more tackles in order to get more than 11 FFUM...
5
not over/under but he guessed correctly

5 out of 29 for a FFUM... around 17% of your tackles is a fumble...
last season you were at 12%
season before that at almost 21%
seems to be nothing wrong, you need to make more tackles in order to get more than 11 FFUM...
Triathlon Dude
offline
offline
Originally posted by Charles Fridholm
Originally posted by TrevJo
5
not over/under but he guessed correctly
5 out of 29 for a FFUM... around 17% of your tackles is a fumble...
last season you were at 12%
season before that at almost 21%
seems to be nothing wrong, you need to make more tackles in order to get more than 11 FFUM...
The issue is that the two seasons before that were on Balanced. and this year he was on Power.....I would expect an uptick in the number of FF's and Missed Tackles. The missed Tackles definetly went up......
Originally posted by TrevJo
5
not over/under but he guessed correctly

5 out of 29 for a FFUM... around 17% of your tackles is a fumble...
last season you were at 12%
season before that at almost 21%
seems to be nothing wrong, you need to make more tackles in order to get more than 11 FFUM...
The issue is that the two seasons before that were on Balanced. and this year he was on Power.....I would expect an uptick in the number of FF's and Missed Tackles. The missed Tackles definetly went up......
Golan
offline
offline
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
The issue is that the two seasons before that were on Balanced. and this year he was on Power.....I would expect an uptick in the number of FF's and Missed Tackles. The missed Tackles definetly went up......
That's not how it work... Thought you'd get that by now.
You need to make the tackle before you force a fumble, if you miss a tackle, you have a 0% chance of getting what you want. Reaching the tipping point where Power > Balanced is key, and it's clear that your player isn't there, thus he shouldn't be on power.
The issue is that the two seasons before that were on Balanced. and this year he was on Power.....I would expect an uptick in the number of FF's and Missed Tackles. The missed Tackles definetly went up......
That's not how it work... Thought you'd get that by now.
You need to make the tackle before you force a fumble, if you miss a tackle, you have a 0% chance of getting what you want. Reaching the tipping point where Power > Balanced is key, and it's clear that your player isn't there, thus he shouldn't be on power.
Triathlon Dude
offline
offline
Originally posted by Golan
That's not how it work... Thought you'd get that by now.
You need to make the tackle before you force a fumble, if you miss a tackle, you have a 0% chance of getting what you want. Reaching the tipping point where Power > Balanced is key, and it's clear that your player isn't there, thus he shouldn't be on power.
That is the issue with Balanced and Power then..........
Power is suppose to get you more forced fumbles while making you miss more tackles......
Using your logic should mean that Wrap-UP will get you the most fumbles, because it gives you the highest chance to make a tackle.
I don't know how often I have to say this......I am fine with an uptick in the number of missed tackles, what I am not fine with is the corresponding FF's.
To use the player in the OP - Cough The Ball UP
Last season he had 105 Tackle opportunities. Of those he had 87 Tackles(83%), 7 Missed Tackles(7%), 11 Forced Fumbles(10%)
This season he had 40 Tackle Opportunites. Of those he had 29 Tackles (72%), 6 Missed Tackles (15%), 5 Forced Fumbles (12%).
To use the other player in the OP - Cough the Ball UP Twin
Last season he had 49 Tackle Opportunites. Of those he had 44 Tackles(89%), 2 Missed Tackles (5%), 3 Forced Fumbles (6%)
This season he had 91 Tackle Opportunities. Of those he had 65 Tackles (71%), 21 Missed Tackles (23%), 5 Forced Fumbles (5%).
======================================================================================
What does this show, that the difference in Balanced and Power is working properly in the aspect of Missed Tackles, but it is not working correctly in the aspect of Forcing Fumbles. The Missed Tackles is pretty much doubleing from Balanced to Power, but the % of Fumbles is staying the same to a certain degree.
That's not how it work... Thought you'd get that by now.
You need to make the tackle before you force a fumble, if you miss a tackle, you have a 0% chance of getting what you want. Reaching the tipping point where Power > Balanced is key, and it's clear that your player isn't there, thus he shouldn't be on power.
That is the issue with Balanced and Power then..........
Power is suppose to get you more forced fumbles while making you miss more tackles......
Using your logic should mean that Wrap-UP will get you the most fumbles, because it gives you the highest chance to make a tackle.
I don't know how often I have to say this......I am fine with an uptick in the number of missed tackles, what I am not fine with is the corresponding FF's.
To use the player in the OP - Cough The Ball UP
Last season he had 105 Tackle opportunities. Of those he had 87 Tackles(83%), 7 Missed Tackles(7%), 11 Forced Fumbles(10%)
This season he had 40 Tackle Opportunites. Of those he had 29 Tackles (72%), 6 Missed Tackles (15%), 5 Forced Fumbles (12%).
To use the other player in the OP - Cough the Ball UP Twin
Last season he had 49 Tackle Opportunites. Of those he had 44 Tackles(89%), 2 Missed Tackles (5%), 3 Forced Fumbles (6%)
This season he had 91 Tackle Opportunities. Of those he had 65 Tackles (71%), 21 Missed Tackles (23%), 5 Forced Fumbles (5%).
======================================================================================
What does this show, that the difference in Balanced and Power is working properly in the aspect of Missed Tackles, but it is not working correctly in the aspect of Forcing Fumbles. The Missed Tackles is pretty much doubleing from Balanced to Power, but the % of Fumbles is staying the same to a certain degree.
Triathlon Dude
offline
offline
Originally posted by BuddyRyans34D
Originally posted by BuddyRyans34D
over rated
retire
Cough the Ball Up is....
Originally posted by BuddyRyans34D
over rated
retire
Cough the Ball Up is....
And for the 3rd stright season in a row in CPL the winner is...and with the exact same amount of FFum's as last season...
Amare Tuck!
<------Called it!
Amare Tuck!
<------Called it!
thunderdoozer
offline
offline
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Everybody thought that Cough The Ball Up sucked alst year, until he came in 2nd with the # of FF's in the league.......
They couldn't believe that a build like that could actually work........
I don't see what is unique about the build except that it is slow and vision is way too low.
Everybody thought that Cough The Ball Up sucked alst year, until he came in 2nd with the # of FF's in the league.......
They couldn't believe that a build like that could actually work........
I don't see what is unique about the build except that it is slow and vision is way too low.
Triathlon Dude
offline
offline
Originally posted by thunderdoozer
I don't see what is unique about the build except that it is slow and vision is way too low.
that's the point......
I don't see what is unique about the build except that it is slow and vision is way too low.
that's the point......thunderdoozer
offline
offline
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
that's the point......
The point is that you are a bad dot-builder?
that's the point......The point is that you are a bad dot-builder?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.




























