Good game guys. Gratz to you both - very strong teams.
Look forward to meeting you guys in WL with Moose......
Look forward to meeting you guys in WL with Moose......
coreyls18
offline
offline
Originally posted by ricksta1975
Good game guys. Gratz to you both - very strong teams.
Look forward to meeting you guys in WL with Moose......
We look forward to that bye week
Good game guys. Gratz to you both - very strong teams.
Look forward to meeting you guys in WL with Moose......
We look forward to that bye week
ricksta1975
offline
offline
Originally posted by coreyls18
We look forward to that bye week
yeah, we may be struggling next season. may not be far from the truth!
We look forward to that bye week
yeah, we may be struggling next season. may not be far from the truth!
coreyls18
offline
offline
Originally posted by ricksta1975
yeah, we may be struggling next season. may not be far from the truth!
well if you guys want, send message to support and ask to be swapped with united empire
yeah, we may be struggling next season. may not be far from the truth!
well if you guys want, send message to support and ask to be swapped with united empire
KCChiefsMan
offline
offline
HOLY SHIT!
How did nobody mention that E-City missed the game tying extra point in the 4th quarter? I just now realized that, holy moly the wrath of my drunken rage would have been 10 fold the last time I rage quit.
I guess it wouldn't have mattered, but still
How did nobody mention that E-City missed the game tying extra point in the 4th quarter? I just now realized that, holy moly the wrath of my drunken rage would have been 10 fold the last time I rage quit.
I guess it wouldn't have mattered, but still
Edited by KCChiefsMan on Apr 25, 2011 23:39:58
ricksta1975
offline
offline
Originally posted by KCChiefsMan
HOLY SHIT!
How did nobody mention that E-City missed the game tying extra point in the 4th quarter? I just now realized that, holy moly the wrath of my drunken rage would have been 10 fold the last time I rage quit.
I guess it wouldn't have mattered, but still
erm, people did mention it
but it wasnt a big deal as they made their way up the field and only would have had the shortest of FGs to win the game if you dont believe that moral would have changed drastically.....
HOLY SHIT!
How did nobody mention that E-City missed the game tying extra point in the 4th quarter? I just now realized that, holy moly the wrath of my drunken rage would have been 10 fold the last time I rage quit.
I guess it wouldn't have mattered, but still
erm, people did mention it
but it wasnt a big deal as they made their way up the field and only would have had the shortest of FGs to win the game if you dont believe that moral would have changed drastically.....
Zickzack
offline
offline
Doesn't really matter, Paris did miss a manageable FG before same way as we did miss the XP, and it is more than likely they would just have scored another 3 with time expiring, either way they are a deserving winner, they have beaten us every time it meant something this season, no need to discuss what might have been, we lost the game in the first half and not on that missed XP.
coreyls18
offline
offline
Originally posted by Luke Pass
People did mention this, and it very well could have changed the out come....
Yeah it was mentioned but wouldnt have changed outcome unless you think the K would have missed the game winning FG, which is possible. But IMHO we wouldnt have kicked the FG we would have scored a TD first instead. 1:47 left on their 18.5 yard line with 3 timeouts left.
People did mention this, and it very well could have changed the out come....
Yeah it was mentioned but wouldnt have changed outcome unless you think the K would have missed the game winning FG, which is possible. But IMHO we wouldnt have kicked the FG we would have scored a TD first instead. 1:47 left on their 18.5 yard line with 3 timeouts left.
Luke Pass
offline
offline
Originally posted by coreyls18
Yeah it was mentioned but wouldnt have changed outcome unless you think the K would have missed the game winning FG, which is possible. But IMHO we wouldnt have kicked the FG we would have scored a TD first instead. 1:47 left on their 18.5 yard line with 3 timeouts left.
Like I mentioned above .... OBVIOUSLY we can't go off of what "did happen", because the OAI changes ..... Totally different from being up, to being tied, every coordinator knows this. That being said, it very well "could have" changed the outcome, but certainly no need to beat a dead horse. The better team won.
Yeah it was mentioned but wouldnt have changed outcome unless you think the K would have missed the game winning FG, which is possible. But IMHO we wouldnt have kicked the FG we would have scored a TD first instead. 1:47 left on their 18.5 yard line with 3 timeouts left.
Like I mentioned above .... OBVIOUSLY we can't go off of what "did happen", because the OAI changes ..... Totally different from being up, to being tied, every coordinator knows this. That being said, it very well "could have" changed the outcome, but certainly no need to beat a dead horse. The better team won.
coreyls18
offline
offline
Originally posted by Luke Pass
Like I mentioned above .... OBVIOUSLY we can't go off of what "did happen", because the OAI changes ..... Totally different from being up, to being tied, every coordinator knows this. That being said, it very well "could have" changed the outcome, but certainly no need to beat a dead horse. The better team won.
Im still confused what you keep talking about with the outcome...how could the outcome had been different? You still talking about the missed XP or something different? And no, its the same Ai for a tied score in that type of situation. Atleast for my AI. : )
I like beating dead horses. Say they made the XP. We still got down to their 18 yard line with about 2 min left. They were out of timeouts. So even if we run the ball 3 times in a row(which would have been what would be called in my AI) they stop us, we kick the FG with 1 sec left. OR we score a TD with under 45 seconds left. OR we get closer to the GL and get stopped or time runs out so kick a FG with 1 second left. So yeah, looks like outcome would have been same. (unless missed FG, but majority of PRO/WL kickers are more accurate inside 30 yards then they are at XPs)
Like I mentioned above .... OBVIOUSLY we can't go off of what "did happen", because the OAI changes ..... Totally different from being up, to being tied, every coordinator knows this. That being said, it very well "could have" changed the outcome, but certainly no need to beat a dead horse. The better team won.
Im still confused what you keep talking about with the outcome...how could the outcome had been different? You still talking about the missed XP or something different? And no, its the same Ai for a tied score in that type of situation. Atleast for my AI. : )
I like beating dead horses. Say they made the XP. We still got down to their 18 yard line with about 2 min left. They were out of timeouts. So even if we run the ball 3 times in a row(which would have been what would be called in my AI) they stop us, we kick the FG with 1 sec left. OR we score a TD with under 45 seconds left. OR we get closer to the GL and get stopped or time runs out so kick a FG with 1 second left. So yeah, looks like outcome would have been same. (unless missed FG, but majority of PRO/WL kickers are more accurate inside 30 yards then they are at XPs)
kongemeier
offline
offline
Originally posted by coreyls18
OR we score a TD with under 45 seconds left.
If this happened E-City would have scored! 45 seconds is more than enough to drive the length of the field with the current sim, so don't say that!
OR we score a TD with under 45 seconds left.
If this happened E-City would have scored! 45 seconds is more than enough to drive the length of the field with the current sim, so don't say that!
coreyls18
offline
offline
Originally posted by kongemeier
If this happened E-City would have scored! 45 seconds is more than enough to drive the length of the field with the current sim, so don't say that!
lol true but not with 0 timeouts. Never know though...
If this happened E-City would have scored! 45 seconds is more than enough to drive the length of the field with the current sim, so don't say that!
lol true but not with 0 timeouts. Never know though...
Luke Pass
offline
offline
Originally posted by coreyls18
Im still confused what you keep talking about with the outcome...how could the outcome had been different? You still talking about the missed XP or something different? And no, its the same Ai for a tied score in that type of situation. Atleast for my AI. : )
I like beating dead horses. Say they made the XP. We still got down to their 18 yard line with about 2 min left. They were out of timeouts. So even if we run the ball 3 times in a row(which would have been what would be called in my AI) they stop us, we kick the FG with 1 sec left. OR we score a TD with under 45 seconds left. OR we get closer to the GL and get stopped or time runs out so kick a FG with 1 second left. So yeah, looks like outcome would have been same. (unless missed FG, but majority of PRO/WL kickers are more accurate inside 30 yards then they are at XPs)
This will go nowhere, so I will "assume" you are the only OC I have met in 20+ seasons to have the same exact AI when leading by 1 pt with ball (game over for most part) ...... as opposed to a tie ball game, NEEDING a score ..... its actually laughable. Like I said, no need to beat a dead horse, the better team won that game.
Im still confused what you keep talking about with the outcome...how could the outcome had been different? You still talking about the missed XP or something different? And no, its the same Ai for a tied score in that type of situation. Atleast for my AI. : )
I like beating dead horses. Say they made the XP. We still got down to their 18 yard line with about 2 min left. They were out of timeouts. So even if we run the ball 3 times in a row(which would have been what would be called in my AI) they stop us, we kick the FG with 1 sec left. OR we score a TD with under 45 seconds left. OR we get closer to the GL and get stopped or time runs out so kick a FG with 1 second left. So yeah, looks like outcome would have been same. (unless missed FG, but majority of PRO/WL kickers are more accurate inside 30 yards then they are at XPs)
This will go nowhere, so I will "assume" you are the only OC I have met in 20+ seasons to have the same exact AI when leading by 1 pt with ball (game over for most part) ...... as opposed to a tie ball game, NEEDING a score ..... its actually laughable.
Like I said, no need to beat a dead horse, the better team won that game.coreyls18
offline
offline
Originally posted by Luke Pass
This will go nowhere, so I will "assume" you are the only OC I have met in 20+ seasons to have the same exact AI when leading by 1 pt with ball (game over for most part) ...... as opposed to a tie ball game, NEEDING a score ..... its actually laughable. Like I said, no need to beat a dead horse, the better team won that game.
Ai is different outside redzone and down by 3+. It was tied, we were in redzone, and up by one(or if tied) it runs same AI. And I only kick FG if under 15 seconds left. Which now with new feature would kick a FG with 1 sec left. So your assumption would be correct. Nice to have met you too
This will go nowhere, so I will "assume" you are the only OC I have met in 20+ seasons to have the same exact AI when leading by 1 pt with ball (game over for most part) ...... as opposed to a tie ball game, NEEDING a score ..... its actually laughable.
Like I said, no need to beat a dead horse, the better team won that game.Ai is different outside redzone and down by 3+. It was tied, we were in redzone, and up by one(or if tied) it runs same AI. And I only kick FG if under 15 seconds left. Which now with new feature would kick a FG with 1 sec left. So your assumption would be correct. Nice to have met you too
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
