Originally posted by Lil Czar
would blitz SA work on a DE. It says it is for a CB.
it works, but it isn't worth it
would blitz SA work on a DE. It says it is for a CB.
it works, but it isn't worth it
BiggerBlue
offline
offline
Originally posted by Lil Czar
would blitz SA work on a DE. It says it is for a CB.
It works but many of us have figured out that the increase is so minimal that it's not worth it. Go with Balance for another extra SA.
would blitz SA work on a DE. It says it is for a CB.
It works but many of us have figured out that the increase is so minimal that it's not worth it. Go with Balance for another extra SA.
SunshineMan89
offline
offline
Originally posted by tautology
27 sacks in WL, zero from exploit blitzing:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1309759
Taut, what do you like in terms of Speed/Agility/Strength split? My guy is going to be at 315 after 72s, but I have the ability to realign some EQ at that point.
I haven't been too happy with Strength/Agility this season, but it's worked in the past. Has high SAs, four AEQ, 60s tackling/vision, etc.
Seems like it's best to either go all in on strength or have just enough to avoid getting caked and go 115+ on both speed and agility.
27 sacks in WL, zero from exploit blitzing:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1309759
Taut, what do you like in terms of Speed/Agility/Strength split? My guy is going to be at 315 after 72s, but I have the ability to realign some EQ at that point.
I haven't been too happy with Strength/Agility this season, but it's worked in the past. Has high SAs, four AEQ, 60s tackling/vision, etc.
Seems like it's best to either go all in on strength or have just enough to avoid getting caked and go 115+ on both speed and agility.
motownjunk
offline
offline
Originally posted by SunshineMan89
Taut, what do you like in terms of Speed/Agility/Strength split? My guy is going to be at 315 after 72s, but I have the ability to realign some EQ at that point.
I haven't been too happy with Strength/Agility this season, but it's worked in the past. Has high SAs, four AEQ, 60s tackling/vision, etc.
Seems like it's best to either go all in on strength or have just enough to avoid getting caked and go 115+ on both speed and agility.
I'm wondering this as well. My older DE has been running with a roughly even strength/agility split (which will become a bit more agility-heavy after 64 upgrades) and mid-80s speed. But he's stashed away on a lolcasualpro team that had literally one competitive regular season game this year, so it's difficult to tell if that setup is sustainable long-term or not.
Taut, what do you like in terms of Speed/Agility/Strength split? My guy is going to be at 315 after 72s, but I have the ability to realign some EQ at that point.
I haven't been too happy with Strength/Agility this season, but it's worked in the past. Has high SAs, four AEQ, 60s tackling/vision, etc.
Seems like it's best to either go all in on strength or have just enough to avoid getting caked and go 115+ on both speed and agility.
I'm wondering this as well. My older DE has been running with a roughly even strength/agility split (which will become a bit more agility-heavy after 64 upgrades) and mid-80s speed. But he's stashed away on a lolcasualpro team that had literally one competitive regular season game this year, so it's difficult to tell if that setup is sustainable long-term or not.
ehrso11
offline
offline
140+ STR
95+ speed
85+ Agi
Break Block x2
bull rush
pocket crush
pass rush
shed blocks
Power rush tactic
95+ speed
85+ Agi
Break Block x2
bull rush
pocket crush
pass rush
shed blocks
Power rush tactic
For an agility build I have found that you really have to have 100 speed if you want to be putting up sacks in the top leagues, 105-110 is preferable.
tautology
offline
offline
Originally posted by SunshineMan89
Originally posted by tautology
27 sacks in WL, zero from exploit blitzing:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1309759
Taut, what do you like in terms of Speed/Agility/Strength split? My guy is going to be at 315 after 72s, but I have the ability to realign some EQ at that point.
I haven't been too happy with Strength/Agility this season, but it's worked in the past. Has high SAs, four AEQ, 60s tackling/vision, etc.
Seems like it's best to either go all in on strength or have just enough to avoid getting caked and go 115+ on both speed and agility.
1) 320 for current guys, and probably slightly higher for future builds.
2) Might try higher vision and tackling? Or maybe you just aren't high enough on Str/Agi or have the wrong VAs etc.
3) I roughly agree.
Originally posted by tautology
27 sacks in WL, zero from exploit blitzing:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1309759
Taut, what do you like in terms of Speed/Agility/Strength split? My guy is going to be at 315 after 72s, but I have the ability to realign some EQ at that point.
I haven't been too happy with Strength/Agility this season, but it's worked in the past. Has high SAs, four AEQ, 60s tackling/vision, etc.
Seems like it's best to either go all in on strength or have just enough to avoid getting caked and go 115+ on both speed and agility.
1) 320 for current guys, and probably slightly higher for future builds.
2) Might try higher vision and tackling? Or maybe you just aren't high enough on Str/Agi or have the wrong VAs etc.
3) I roughly agree.
Edited by tautology on Mar 23, 2011 16:10:56
tedtinker
offline
offline
Originally posted by tautology
1) 320 for current guys, and probably slightly higher for future builds.
2) Might try higher vision and tackling? Or maybe you just aren't high enough on Str/Agi or have the wrong VAs etc.
3) I roughly agree.
So...is this with or with out eq? And what would optimum strength/agility be?
1) 320 for current guys, and probably slightly higher for future builds.
2) Might try higher vision and tackling? Or maybe you just aren't high enough on Str/Agi or have the wrong VAs etc.
3) I roughly agree.
So...is this with or with out eq? And what would optimum strength/agility be?
Edited by tedtinker on Mar 23, 2011 20:31:03
Forbin
offline
offline
Originally posted by tedtinker
So...is this with or with out eq? And what would optimum strength/agility be?
Obviously with EQ. Ever try getting 3 attributes over 300 natural?
So...is this with or with out eq? And what would optimum strength/agility be?
Obviously with EQ. Ever try getting 3 attributes over 300 natural?
Rage Kinard
offline
offline
Originally posted by Forbin
Obviously with EQ. Ever try getting 3 attributes over 300 natural?
with archetypes you can get close. You can definitely hit 290.
Obviously with EQ. Ever try getting 3 attributes over 300 natural?
with archetypes you can get close. You can definitely hit 290.
Forbin
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
with archetypes you can get close. You can definitely hit 290.
Yeah, but only worth it on a K or P probably.
with archetypes you can get close. You can definitely hit 290.
Yeah, but only worth it on a K or P probably.
Rage Kinard
offline
offline
Originally posted by Forbin
Yeah, but only worth it on a K or P probably.
No it's worth it on DL guys as well. You can get over 290 and still have 75 vision and 55 stamina and confidence if you are willing to forget about tackling. Or you could drop down to about 65 vision and have 60+ tackling.
Of course that is with 3 AEQ rather than 4.
Yeah, but only worth it on a K or P probably.
No it's worth it on DL guys as well. You can get over 290 and still have 75 vision and 55 stamina and confidence if you are willing to forget about tackling. Or you could drop down to about 65 vision and have 60+ tackling.
Of course that is with 3 AEQ rather than 4.
tautology
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
No it might be worth it on DL guys as well. You can get over 290 and still have 75 vision and 55 stamina and confidence if you are willing to forget about tackling. Or you could drop down to about 65 vision and have 60+ tackling.
Of course that is with 3 AEQ rather than 4.
fyp
No it might be worth it on DL guys as well. You can get over 290 and still have 75 vision and 55 stamina and confidence if you are willing to forget about tackling. Or you could drop down to about 65 vision and have 60+ tackling.
Of course that is with 3 AEQ rather than 4.
fyp
Forbin
offline
offline
Originally posted by tautology
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
No it might be worth it on DL guys as well. You can get over 290 and still have 75 vision and 55 stamina and confidence if you are willing to forget about tackling. Or you could drop down to about 65 vision and have 60+ tackling.
Of course that is with 3 AEQ rather than 4.
fyp
Time will tell.
And, 3 AEQ vs. 4 AEQ, in most cases is not a huge deal to me. The little squadron of dots I built this last offseason, most of them will end up with 3 AEQ, just because I like the benefit of training tertiary attributes to 55 or so. (train to 40-41, cap at 49, train to 55)
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
No it might be worth it on DL guys as well. You can get over 290 and still have 75 vision and 55 stamina and confidence if you are willing to forget about tackling. Or you could drop down to about 65 vision and have 60+ tackling.
Of course that is with 3 AEQ rather than 4.
fyp
Time will tell.
And, 3 AEQ vs. 4 AEQ, in most cases is not a huge deal to me. The little squadron of dots I built this last offseason, most of them will end up with 3 AEQ, just because I like the benefit of training tertiary attributes to 55 or so. (train to 40-41, cap at 49, train to 55)
ninja turtles
offline
offline
Originally posted by regoob2
Thats not really true. Ive played with 88 str on my RE and he would only get pancaked a few times a game if that.
agreed. my RDE has 89 STR and just finished WL S21 only pancaked 8 times.
Thats not really true. Ive played with 88 str on my RE and he would only get pancaked a few times a game if that.
agreed. my RDE has 89 STR and just finished WL S21 only pancaked 8 times.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
