GG Chicago, had to avenge that last loss.....
smittdog101
offline
offline
GG Kittens
A new sim and 1st season in the Pro's = no t a good combination.
GL with your fast start.
A new sim and 1st season in the Pro's = no t a good combination.
GL with your fast start.
Krille820
offline
offline
Originally posted by smittdog101
GG Kittens
A new sim and 1st season in the Pro's = no t a good combination.
GL with your fast start.
GG and thanks, guys. Helluva game. WeŽll try remember cover the TE next time!
GG Kittens
A new sim and 1st season in the Pro's = no t a good combination.
GL with your fast start.
GG and thanks, guys. Helluva game. WeŽll try remember cover the TE next time!
jktooley
offline
offline
I really have ZERO idea of what MEM was trying to do with that passing defense... Bortsville loses that game by 14 if they don't get single coverage in singleback on 3rd and 10+
Skanker irl
offline
offline
Originally posted by jktooley
I really have ZERO idea of what MEM was trying to do with that passing defense... Bortsville loses that game by 14 if they don't get single coverage in singleback on 3rd and 10+
While I doubt we would have lost the game by 14, the passing defense was a bit extreme. They were probably stacking the box to try and stop the greatest HB in the game. It backfired fo sho though. Can't really blame them that much I guess, if they didn't stack the box Bort Baggins would have torn them a new one. Well, even more than he did.
I really have ZERO idea of what MEM was trying to do with that passing defense... Bortsville loses that game by 14 if they don't get single coverage in singleback on 3rd and 10+
While I doubt we would have lost the game by 14, the passing defense was a bit extreme. They were probably stacking the box to try and stop the greatest HB in the game. It backfired fo sho though. Can't really blame them that much I guess, if they didn't stack the box Bort Baggins would have torn them a new one. Well, even more than he did.
coachviking
offline
offline
Originally posted by Skanker irl
Originally posted by jktooley
I really have ZERO idea of what MEM was trying to do with that passing defense... Bortsville loses that game by 14 if they don't get single coverage in singleback on 3rd and 10+
While I doubt we would have lost the game by 14, the passing defense was a bit extreme. They were probably stacking the box to try and stop the greatest HB in the game. It backfired fo sho though. Can't really blame them that much I guess, if they didn't stack the box Bort Baggins would have torn them a new one. Well, even more than he did.
Actually we assumed that Clay would be the Uncovered WR in that situation ,so we figured we were safe.
Originally posted by jktooley
I really have ZERO idea of what MEM was trying to do with that passing defense... Bortsville loses that game by 14 if they don't get single coverage in singleback on 3rd and 10+
While I doubt we would have lost the game by 14, the passing defense was a bit extreme. They were probably stacking the box to try and stop the greatest HB in the game. It backfired fo sho though. Can't really blame them that much I guess, if they didn't stack the box Bort Baggins would have torn them a new one. Well, even more than he did.
Actually we assumed that Clay would be the Uncovered WR in that situation ,so we figured we were safe.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
