Warrior General Games

Unconvincing argument

Originally posted by Mofo
Unconvincing argument

hahaha

I've never seen a bad build do well in a category that matters.
Dooley isn't bad, he just has surprisingly normal looking attributes.

Originally posted by PsychoMan001
why would people complain that he wasn't wearing equipment?

no idea. i couldn't understand that either.

guess we'll have to go with: because they're idiots

Originally posted by Daddy Warbucks
Originally posted by Mofo

Unconvincing argument

hahaha

I've never seen a bad build do well in a category that matters.
Dooley isn't bad, he just has surprisingly normal looking attributes.

Remember that when dooley was created, there was a different training system, and you could only train for 40 days a season. Also, he has been in CPL for 100% of his games, and has been trying to win every game, so he was spending SPs on stamina early in his career.

Finally, back in the early seasons, you couldn't stop your QBs from passing to your HBs, so people had to spend SPs on catching in their first couple seasons if they didn't want to be a total liability every time they stood on the field.

So yeah, from placing SPs in stamina and catching alone early on, you can see why his build doesn't look as amazing as someone who was started in season 3 or so, and wasn't worrying about winning for their first 5 seasons.

Did you cap build him, not that it matters i'm just curious

Yes, but i didn't really understand why (we didn't know about diminishing returns), the caps just seemed like good points to stop working on one attribute, and move over to the next.

I'm starting to think the SA's are a big key. My back has pretty good attributes but he sucks. I've decided to change him over to a power back and see if he does any better.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=937484

Originally posted by dhalme
I'm starting to think the SA's are a big key. My back has pretty good attributes but he sucks. I've decided to change him over to a power back and see if he does any better.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=937484





that vision/conf/stam is very very low.

Originally posted by Gart888
Originally posted by PsychoMan001

why would people complain that he wasn't wearing equipment?

no idea. i couldn't understand that either.

guess we'll have to go with: because they're idiots

haha ok

Originally posted by PsychoMan001
Originally posted by dhalme

I'm starting to think the SA's are a big key. My back has pretty good attributes but he sucks. I've decided to change him over to a power back and see if he does any better.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=937484





that vision/conf/stam is very very low.

At level 31? They should be very very low because wasting SP's on them that early is dumb.

Originally posted by taurran
Originally posted by PsychoMan001

Originally posted by dhalme


I'm starting to think the SA's are a big key. My back has pretty good attributes but he sucks. I've decided to change him over to a power back and see if he does any better.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=937484





that vision/conf/stam is very very low.

At level 31? They should be very very low because wasting SP's on them that early is dumb.

then he shouldn't be complaining that his back isn't producing

It's rather scary to realize that my 38 HB has the exact same build (3 points less in strength, 2 more in agility) as dooley had at 50...

the power of slowbuilding I suppose.

i thought it was strange too comparing my L38 HB...but at the same time, it makes sense.

I have a L15 HB who will easily pass my L38 by his early 30s too...just kinda how it goes as you learn more.

Well one tidbit of info, the absolute best ratio of speed to agility is 5:4
so if you have 100 speed, the best agility you can have to make it work for you is 80.

Originally posted by Raid
Well one tidbit of info, the absolute best ratio of speed to agility is 5:4
so if you have 100 speed, the best agility you can have to make it work for you is 80.

Says who?