11th?
bell 3id
offline
offline
Yeah i think the Bulls had a tough schedule... we also got off to a slow start with FA signing and tactics... we got it figured out and finished the season pretty good look out next year!!!
GeneralMills92
offline
offline
I think those are very valid. If you are going to base the system off of actaull performance, you need to take into account the teams they played against. Power rankings based off of players levels and such do not need to take this into account, but this one does.
cparker5
offline
offline
Originally posted by bell 3id
Yeah i think the Bulls had a tough schedule... we also got off to a slow start with FA signing and tactics... we got it figured out and finished the season pretty good look out next year!!!
I think this tough schedule stuff is funny, everyone in a cofnerence shared 15 of 16 games
Yeah i think the Bulls had a tough schedule... we also got off to a slow start with FA signing and tactics... we got it figured out and finished the season pretty good look out next year!!!
I think this tough schedule stuff is funny, everyone in a cofnerence shared 15 of 16 games
GeneralMills92
offline
offline
Its ture, but the thing is, some teams get their act together later. I have seen teams go 0-5 to start the season and then they just bounce back and win against some really great teams to make then 5th seed or something. The order of when you play the games can have a huge effect on the outcome of a season
Luke 28
offline
offline
Can I just say after everyone saying these rankings were wrong 4 of the top 6 are in their respective Conference finals games.. just saying
cparker5
offline
offline
Originally posted by Luke 28
Can I just say after everyone saying these rankings were wrong 4 of the top 6 are in their respective Conference finals games.. just saying
I don't think everyone said these rankings were wrong. I know I never commented on them.
Can I just say after everyone saying these rankings were wrong 4 of the top 6 are in their respective Conference finals games.. just saying
I don't think everyone said these rankings were wrong. I know I never commented on them.
cparker5
offline
offline
Originally posted by Luke 28
Ok I should have said everyone who has said
I think a bunch of us read them and were thankful that someone took the time to post some meaningful content. So even if we didn't agree 100% we were thankful for them.
Thanks for putting these together and I had no issue with where my team ended up in these rankings.
Ok I should have said everyone who has said
I think a bunch of us read them and were thankful that someone took the time to post some meaningful content. So even if we didn't agree 100% we were thankful for them.
Thanks for putting these together and I had no issue with where my team ended up in these rankings.
GeneralMills92
offline
offline
Originally posted by Luke 28
Can I just say after everyone saying these rankings were wrong 4 of the top 6 are in their respective Conference finals games.. just saying
well first of all, Oklahoma... second, rankins apparently don't mean anything because we were 5th (should be 10th in the league right?) but we were ranked 17th. There are just alot of flaws with this system, but it is a great way to predict things and it helps you figure out where you stand in the entire league.
Can I just say after everyone saying these rankings were wrong 4 of the top 6 are in their respective Conference finals games.. just saying
well first of all, Oklahoma... second, rankins apparently don't mean anything because we were 5th (should be 10th in the league right?) but we were ranked 17th. There are just alot of flaws with this system, but it is a great way to predict things and it helps you figure out where you stand in the entire league.
GeneralMills92
offline
offline
Originally posted by Vortus
I think its like the superbowl, neutral site.
yeppers
I think its like the superbowl, neutral site.
yeppers
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.






























