Warrior General Games

Originally posted by DarkRogue
Originally posted by Uncle Buck

Originally posted by Jacob McCandles


Originally posted by Uncle Buck



I finished tied for 9th at 7-9 in the west.

Ludlow finished 14-1-1 in the east. (just using them as an example)

How do the chiefs match up with Ludlow.

Overall- Ludlow 30 Chiefs 30
Passing- Ludlow 33 Chiefs 33
Rushing- Ludlow 24 Chiefs 27
Rec.- Ludlow 24 Chiefs 24
Blocking-Ludlow 33 Chiefs 30
Pass D- Ludlow 24 Chiefs 24
run d- Ludlow 27 Chiefs 27
kicking- Ludlow 39 Chiefs 36

So honestly, I don't think it is debatable that the west is stronger. Our top 10 teams went 9-1 yesterday.

I think you place too much stock in the scouting reports.

obviously there is more to the game then scouting reports. I was just using Ludlow as an example. Don't get your panties in a bunch. just pointing out that the #10 team in the West matches up with the #2 team in the East. I think yesterday proved that the West is better than the east.

Good luck to all in the playoffs. See you guys next season or 10 days....lol

Not to mention that the easts number 2 and 3 teams played 2 of the bottom feeders of the western conference, Ludlow could compete with any western conference team

i never said that they couldn't compete. no doubt that they could.

Originally posted by Uncle Buck
Originally posted by Jacob McCandles

Originally posted by Uncle Buck


I finished tied for 9th at 7-9 in the west.

Ludlow finished 14-1-1 in the east. (just using them as an example)

How do the chiefs match up with Ludlow.

Overall- Ludlow 30 Chiefs 30
Passing- Ludlow 33 Chiefs 33
Rushing- Ludlow 24 Chiefs 27
Rec.- Ludlow 24 Chiefs 24
Blocking-Ludlow 33 Chiefs 30
Pass D- Ludlow 24 Chiefs 24
run d- Ludlow 27 Chiefs 27
kicking- Ludlow 39 Chiefs 36

So honestly, I don't think it is debatable that the west is stronger. Our top 10 teams went 9-1 yesterday.

I think you place too much stock in the scouting reports.

obviously there is more to the game then scouting reports. I was just using Ludlow as an example. Don't get your panties in a bunch. just pointing out that the #10 team in the West matches up with the #2 team in the East. I think yesterday proved that the West is better than the east.

Good luck to all in the playoffs. See you guys next season or 10 days....lol

So #10 and #2 match up based on this simple scouting report yet if I compare the same scouting reports for Chiefs, Badlands, Bombers, and Lions, I see similar results but yet the scores say something entirely different.

The West was better last week in wins. Other than that nothing was proved based on one set of games. You say top heavy, I say bottom lite. etc... etc....

Originally posted by Jacob McCandles
Originally posted by Uncle Buck

Originally posted by Jacob McCandles


Originally posted by Uncle Buck



I finished tied for 9th at 7-9 in the west.

Ludlow finished 14-1-1 in the east. (just using them as an example)

How do the chiefs match up with Ludlow.

Overall- Ludlow 30 Chiefs 30
Passing- Ludlow 33 Chiefs 33
Rushing- Ludlow 24 Chiefs 27
Rec.- Ludlow 24 Chiefs 24
Blocking-Ludlow 33 Chiefs 30
Pass D- Ludlow 24 Chiefs 24
run d- Ludlow 27 Chiefs 27
kicking- Ludlow 39 Chiefs 36

So honestly, I don't think it is debatable that the west is stronger. Our top 10 teams went 9-1 yesterday.

I think you place too much stock in the scouting reports.

obviously there is more to the game then scouting reports. I was just using Ludlow as an example. Don't get your panties in a bunch. just pointing out that the #10 team in the West matches up with the #2 team in the East. I think yesterday proved that the West is better than the east.

Good luck to all in the playoffs. See you guys next season or 10 days....lol

So #10 and #2 match up based on this simple scouting report yet if I compare the same scouting reports for Chiefs, Badlands, Bombers, and Lions, I see similar results but yet the scores say something entirely different.

The West was better last week in wins. Other than that nothing was proved based on one set of games. You say top heavy, I say bottom lite. etc... etc....


Well I played all the top teams in my conference the first 6 weeks of the season before I filled in my roster and actually knew how to set my tactics and what not. I think if I played those teams now it would be a bit different. Not saying that I would win every game but I wouldn't be losing all of them either.

Originally posted by Jacob McCandles

The West was better last week in wins. Other than that nothing was proved based on one set of games. You say top heavy, I say bottom lite. etc... etc....


BDizzle approves of this statement. It was just one week, fellas. Who knows if 6 times out of 10 we (the west) would have beaten them (the east) or they (the east) would have beaten us (the west)? Let's not assume too much here based on limited info.

Unless, of course, your talking about Michigan sucking EPICly at life. I welcome that assumption, since it is truth.

Originally posted by BDizzle80
Originally posted by Jacob McCandles


The West was better last week in wins. Other than that nothing was proved based on one set of games. You say top heavy, I say bottom lite. etc... etc....


BDizzle approves of this statement. It was just one week, fellas. Who knows if 6 times out of 10 we (the west) would have beaten them (the east) or they (the east) would have beaten us (the west)? Let's not assume too much here based on limited info.

Unless, of course, your talking about Michigan sucking EPICly at life. I welcome that assumption, since it is truth.

You must be delusional if you think Michigan sucks. Ohio state sucking though, there's your truth.

Originally posted by DarkRogue
Originally posted by BDizzle80

Originally posted by Jacob McCandles



The West was better last week in wins. Other than that nothing was proved based on one set of games. You say top heavy, I say bottom lite. etc... etc....


BDizzle approves of this statement. It was just one week, fellas. Who knows if 6 times out of 10 we (the west) would have beaten them (the east) or they (the east) would have beaten us (the west)? Let's not assume too much here based on limited info.

Unless, of course, your talking about Michigan sucking EPICly at life. I welcome that assumption, since it is truth.

You must be delusional if you think Michigan sucks. Ohio state sucking though, there's your truth.

STFU, noob. I WILL end your life...

NM

Originally posted by BDizzle80
Originally posted by DarkRogue

Originally posted by BDizzle80


Originally posted by Jacob McCandles




The West was better last week in wins. Other than that nothing was proved based on one set of games. You say top heavy, I say bottom lite. etc... etc....


BDizzle approves of this statement. It was just one week, fellas. Who knows if 6 times out of 10 we (the west) would have beaten them (the east) or they (the east) would have beaten us (the west)? Let's not assume too much here based on limited info.

Unless, of course, your talking about Michigan sucking EPICly at life. I welcome that assumption, since it is truth.

You must be delusional if you think Michigan sucks. Ohio state sucking though, there's your truth.

STFU, noob. I WILL end your life...

SEC > Ohio St

Yeh.. I went there..

LSU > Ohio St... Oh yeah didnt we beat them for that thing called the National Championship? thats why they play the games fella's

Great! My teammate disses me, too...

"Well I played all the top teams in my conference the first 6 weeks of the season before I filled in my roster and actually knew how to set my tactics and what not. I think if I played those teams now it would be a bit different. "

Didnt play us till week 12, I think it would be hard to argue that the result would be much different

Originally posted by DarkRogue
You must be delusional if you think Michigan sucks. Ohio state sucking though, there's your truth.

Yea Michigan is tits awesome, I mean damn, its not like they got beat by a Div II team.......DOH!

Originally posted by MonteA
"Well I played all the top teams in my conference the first 6 weeks of the season before I filled in my roster and actually knew how to set my tactics and what not. I think if I played those teams now it would be a bit different. "

Didnt play us till week 12, I think it would be hard to argue that the result would be much different

Well, I had started down this road earlier and decided to turn back. Now that a bus is going down the road anyway, I just feel I must jump on. It should be noted they did have 4 wonderful victories during the last 8 weeks of the season. And the combined records of those 4 teams, 11-53.

Originally posted by MonteA
"Well I played all the top teams in my conference the first 6 weeks of the season before I filled in my roster and actually knew how to set my tactics and what not. I think if I played those teams now it would be a bit different. "

Didnt play us till week 12, I think it would be hard to argue that the result would be much different

Same for us in week 9. Nearly half the season was gone.

Originally posted by Teutonic
Originally posted by DarkRogue

You must be delusional if you think Michigan sucks. Ohio state sucking though, there's your truth.

Yea Michigan is tits awesome, I mean damn, its not like they got beat by a Div II team.......DOH!



I approve this sarcastic statement.



Also, this just in...Ann Arbor is a whore. Thank you.