i really would like to know what mystery SA UD is looking at... and I wonder if it's smooth operator
mmuhr
offline
offline
I have a decent idea which SA he is thinking about.....yesss yess it may be SO....ballhawk anyone?
JD Cuda
offline
offline
Are you guys using SA and VA interchangeably again?
SA's that are worthwhile = SV, SC, CD
VA's that are worthwhile = Ballhawk probably and a few others....
Did UD misspeak when he said there's another SA that's worthwhile?
----
edit....SO as in Smooth Operator, okay, I see it.
I thought you were capitalizing the word "so", haha. Makes more sense to me now.
SA's that are worthwhile = SV, SC, CD
VA's that are worthwhile = Ballhawk probably and a few others....
Did UD misspeak when he said there's another SA that's worthwhile?
----
edit....SO as in Smooth Operator, okay, I see it.
I thought you were capitalizing the word "so", haha. Makes more sense to me now.
Last edited Apr 16, 2009 10:11:36
Pagypie
offline
offline
i did a bad job building my CB and I'm trying to fix many of my mistakes at this point. i'd love to experiment with SO but I have other holes to patch first
Underdawg08
offline
offline
I have seen some guys with 8 or 10 in this one particular S.A. bring in the INT's like nothing. I am going to get it to 8 next after SV is 10.
It's not been mentioned yet no.
It's not that gay smooth operator one either lol.
It's not been mentioned yet no.
It's not that gay smooth operator one either lol.
Underdawg08
offline
offline
I am not going to spend any v.a's on Ba'al yet. the other 2 have 7 ball hawk. I want to see how they look compared to each other.
I had to bring jumping up to 40 before I really wanted to spend anything in it. Oh well, I think it's worth it to test out ball hawk
I had to bring jumping up to 40 before I really wanted to spend anything in it. Oh well, I think it's worth it to test out ball hawk
Last edited Apr 17, 2009 04:50:54
JD Cuda
offline
offline
Darn, I was hoping it was SO because I had already pumped it somewhat to get SC high, lol.
My next guess would be SH.
Why wouldn't you spend your VA's on Ba'al? We get 2 resets this offseason. Or are you using him as a control?
My next guess would be SH.
Why wouldn't you spend your VA's on Ba'al? We get 2 resets this offseason. Or are you using him as a control?
Pagypie
offline
offline
Originally posted by UnderDogs
I have seen some guys with 8 or 10 in this one particular S.A. bring in the INT's like nothing. I am going to get it to 8 next after SV is 10.
It's not been mentioned yet no.
It's not that gay smooth operator one either lol.then i think it's obvious that you're talking about Blitz.
case closed
I have seen some guys with 8 or 10 in this one particular S.A. bring in the INT's like nothing. I am going to get it to 8 next after SV is 10.
It's not been mentioned yet no.
It's not that gay smooth operator one either lol.then i think it's obvious that you're talking about Blitz.
case closed

SunshineMan89
offline
offline
Originally posted by JD Cuda
Are you guys using SA and VA interchangeably again?
SA's that are worthwhile = SV, SC, CD
VA's that are worthwhile = Ballhawk probably and a few others....
Did UD misspeak when he said there's another SA that's worthwhile?
----
edit....SO as in Smooth Operator, okay, I see it.
I thought you were capitalizing the word "so", haha. Makes more sense to me now.
I meant SA in my initial post to you . . . obviously spending your SP on tackling isn't going to affect your VAs.
However, I would also argue that the proliferation of "help you tackle bigger guy" VAs means yet another reason that you don't need to pump SP into tackling (and yeah, we both agree that's a bad investment anyway at level 30).
Are you guys using SA and VA interchangeably again?
SA's that are worthwhile = SV, SC, CD
VA's that are worthwhile = Ballhawk probably and a few others....
Did UD misspeak when he said there's another SA that's worthwhile?
----
edit....SO as in Smooth Operator, okay, I see it.
I thought you were capitalizing the word "so", haha. Makes more sense to me now.
I meant SA in my initial post to you . . . obviously spending your SP on tackling isn't going to affect your VAs.
However, I would also argue that the proliferation of "help you tackle bigger guy" VAs means yet another reason that you don't need to pump SP into tackling (and yeah, we both agree that's a bad investment anyway at level 30).
JD Cuda
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bacon Nator
would you guys bring vision to 68 right away after speed/agility?
I would.
would you guys bring vision to 68 right away after speed/agility?
I would.
mmuhr
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bacon Nator
would you guys bring vision to 68 right away after speed/agility?
I wouldnt.
would you guys bring vision to 68 right away after speed/agility?
I wouldnt.
Underdawg08
offline
offline
Originally posted by JD Cuda
Darn, I was hoping it was SO because I had already pumped it somewhat to get SC high, lol.
My next guess would be SH.
Why wouldn't you spend your VA's on Ba'al? We get 2 resets this offseason. Or are you using him as a control?
Yeah he is going to be my control.
This may not need to be done. Dee Flecting Has shown nice bursts with Ball hawk. So I think it's going to be everything I expected it to be. It's pretty damn good.
Darn, I was hoping it was SO because I had already pumped it somewhat to get SC high, lol.
My next guess would be SH.
Why wouldn't you spend your VA's on Ba'al? We get 2 resets this offseason. Or are you using him as a control?
Yeah he is going to be my control.
This may not need to be done. Dee Flecting Has shown nice bursts with Ball hawk. So I think it's going to be everything I expected it to be. It's pretty damn good.
Last edited Apr 18, 2009 03:33:22
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.





























