Anybody find it funny that a Nav Troll tries to call out the monkey trolls?
cwrujosh
offline
offline
Originally posted by joemiken
Originally posted by cwrujosh
One of the suggestions that was not adopted, but should have been, was the "repeat plays get harder to run idea".
Basically, the defense learns, in-game, how to stop a play as it gets run ad infinitum. So if you run Strong I OT every play, it will work, but get progressively less successful.
This is just one of many common sense ideas that never get considered.
A LOT of teams in various levels and regions would be up shit creek if this was adopted. It's not hard to run a handful of games, find out which plays are more powerful, then spam the shit out of them. Kinda takes the 'coordinating' out of offensive coordinator, ya know? I have a lot more respect for teams like DDL, Marblehead, West Scranton and Santiago that aren't living off exploits.
I'm fairly certain that if asked, I could tell Bort the plays in 30 seconds.
Originally posted by cwrujosh
One of the suggestions that was not adopted, but should have been, was the "repeat plays get harder to run idea".
Basically, the defense learns, in-game, how to stop a play as it gets run ad infinitum. So if you run Strong I OT every play, it will work, but get progressively less successful.
This is just one of many common sense ideas that never get considered.
A LOT of teams in various levels and regions would be up shit creek if this was adopted. It's not hard to run a handful of games, find out which plays are more powerful, then spam the shit out of them. Kinda takes the 'coordinating' out of offensive coordinator, ya know? I have a lot more respect for teams like DDL, Marblehead, West Scranton and Santiago that aren't living off exploits.
I'm fairly certain that if asked, I could tell Bort the plays in 30 seconds.
Galkuris
offline
offline
Originally posted by joemiken
Originally posted by cwrujosh
One of the suggestions that was not adopted, but should have been, was the "repeat plays get harder to run idea".
Basically, the defense learns, in-game, how to stop a play as it gets run ad infinitum. So if you run Strong I OT every play, it will work, but get progressively less successful.
This is just one of many common sense ideas that never get considered.
A LOT of teams in various levels and regions would be up shit creek if this was adopted. It's not hard to run a handful of games, find out which plays are more powerful, then spam the shit out of them. Kinda takes the 'coordinating' out of offensive coordinator, ya know? I have a lot more respect for teams like DDL, Marblehead, West Scranton and Santiago that aren't living off exploits.
Marauders would be fine as well, just off the top of my head we run at least 20 plays on any given day.
Originally posted by cwrujosh
One of the suggestions that was not adopted, but should have been, was the "repeat plays get harder to run idea".
Basically, the defense learns, in-game, how to stop a play as it gets run ad infinitum. So if you run Strong I OT every play, it will work, but get progressively less successful.
This is just one of many common sense ideas that never get considered.
A LOT of teams in various levels and regions would be up shit creek if this was adopted. It's not hard to run a handful of games, find out which plays are more powerful, then spam the shit out of them. Kinda takes the 'coordinating' out of offensive coordinator, ya know? I have a lot more respect for teams like DDL, Marblehead, West Scranton and Santiago that aren't living off exploits.
Marauders would be fine as well, just off the top of my head we run at least 20 plays on any given day.
cwrujosh
offline
offline
Originally posted by djgomez33
Anyone find it odd none of the big Evil Monkey trolls have popped in? I don't. It's not like they wouldn't have seen this thread in the last 3 hours it has been up.
It's not a discussion about MEM, none of this pertains to any one team.
Anyone find it odd none of the big Evil Monkey trolls have popped in? I don't. It's not like they wouldn't have seen this thread in the last 3 hours it has been up.
It's not a discussion about MEM, none of this pertains to any one team.
Galkuris
offline
offline
Originally posted by cwrujosh
Originally posted by joemiken
Originally posted by cwrujosh
One of the suggestions that was not adopted, but should have been, was the "repeat plays get harder to run idea".
Basically, the defense learns, in-game, how to stop a play as it gets run ad infinitum. So if you run Strong I OT every play, it will work, but get progressively less successful.
This is just one of many common sense ideas that never get considered.
A LOT of teams in various levels and regions would be up shit creek if this was adopted. It's not hard to run a handful of games, find out which plays are more powerful, then spam the shit out of them. Kinda takes the 'coordinating' out of offensive coordinator, ya know? I have a lot more respect for teams like DDL, Marblehead, West Scranton and Santiago that aren't living off exploits.
I'm fairly certain that if asked, I could tell Bort the plays in 30 seconds.
There are 3 of them, so picking one would be a mistake imo.
Originally posted by joemiken
Originally posted by cwrujosh
One of the suggestions that was not adopted, but should have been, was the "repeat plays get harder to run idea".
Basically, the defense learns, in-game, how to stop a play as it gets run ad infinitum. So if you run Strong I OT every play, it will work, but get progressively less successful.
This is just one of many common sense ideas that never get considered.
A LOT of teams in various levels and regions would be up shit creek if this was adopted. It's not hard to run a handful of games, find out which plays are more powerful, then spam the shit out of them. Kinda takes the 'coordinating' out of offensive coordinator, ya know? I have a lot more respect for teams like DDL, Marblehead, West Scranton and Santiago that aren't living off exploits.
I'm fairly certain that if asked, I could tell Bort the plays in 30 seconds.
There are 3 of them, so picking one would be a mistake imo.
cwrujosh
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galkuris
Originally posted by cwrujosh
Originally posted by joemiken
Originally posted by cwrujosh
One of the suggestions that was not adopted, but should have been, was the "repeat plays get harder to run idea".
Basically, the defense learns, in-game, how to stop a play as it gets run ad infinitum. So if you run Strong I OT every play, it will work, but get progressively less successful.
This is just one of many common sense ideas that never get considered.
A LOT of teams in various levels and regions would be up shit creek if this was adopted. It's not hard to run a handful of games, find out which plays are more powerful, then spam the shit out of them. Kinda takes the 'coordinating' out of offensive coordinator, ya know? I have a lot more respect for teams like DDL, Marblehead, West Scranton and Santiago that aren't living off exploits.
I'm fairly certain that if asked, I could tell Bort the plays in 30 seconds.
There are 3 of them, so picking one would be a mistake imo.
I'm afraid your response doesn't make any sense.
Originally posted by cwrujosh
Originally posted by joemiken
Originally posted by cwrujosh
One of the suggestions that was not adopted, but should have been, was the "repeat plays get harder to run idea".
Basically, the defense learns, in-game, how to stop a play as it gets run ad infinitum. So if you run Strong I OT every play, it will work, but get progressively less successful.
This is just one of many common sense ideas that never get considered.
A LOT of teams in various levels and regions would be up shit creek if this was adopted. It's not hard to run a handful of games, find out which plays are more powerful, then spam the shit out of them. Kinda takes the 'coordinating' out of offensive coordinator, ya know? I have a lot more respect for teams like DDL, Marblehead, West Scranton and Santiago that aren't living off exploits.
I'm fairly certain that if asked, I could tell Bort the plays in 30 seconds.
There are 3 of them, so picking one would be a mistake imo.
I'm afraid your response doesn't make any sense.
jfbueno
offline
offline
It's not exactly fun for the run oriented teams to play either. It gets really stale very quickly.
Drago
offline
offline
Originally posted by djgomez33
Anyone find it odd none of the big Evil Monkey trolls have popped in? I don't. It's not like they wouldn't have seen this thread in the last 3 hours it has been up.
I can only imagine the malfunction in your piece of shit brain that would require one of us to come in here and say something to appease you.
Nevermind that our OC has actually come in and said something... I guess you're too stupid to figure something like that out.
Anyone find it odd none of the big Evil Monkey trolls have popped in? I don't. It's not like they wouldn't have seen this thread in the last 3 hours it has been up.
I can only imagine the malfunction in your piece of shit brain that would require one of us to come in here and say something to appease you.
Nevermind that our OC has actually come in and said something... I guess you're too stupid to figure something like that out.
islander1
offline
offline
Originally posted by PP
When he had the 2 for 1 flex sale, I vowed I'd never buy flex again, and I have no intentions of breaking that vow. I've been living off of retirement ever since. When that runs out, I'll be done...Unfortunately, I spent an embarrassingly large amount on the first 6 ssns. So, I'm set for a long time.
Frankly, I don't believe he gives a fuck about any of us that have been around since ssn 1...He till has fresh blood coming in and they don't know any better.
I tagged that 2 for 1 sale, that was the last time I spent money though.
Unless they do another one
When he had the 2 for 1 flex sale, I vowed I'd never buy flex again, and I have no intentions of breaking that vow. I've been living off of retirement ever since. When that runs out, I'll be done...Unfortunately, I spent an embarrassingly large amount on the first 6 ssns. So, I'm set for a long time.
Frankly, I don't believe he gives a fuck about any of us that have been around since ssn 1...He till has fresh blood coming in and they don't know any better.
I tagged that 2 for 1 sale, that was the last time I spent money though.
Unless they do another one
Sik Wit It
offline
offline
My post in our USA Pro team rankings forum:
Originally posted by Sik Wit It
I don't know how this could be done, but there should be a way for defenses to somewhat "key" in on a play after a while. If you faced a team that was running it inside on the strongside 100% of the time, sooner or later you are going to just all sell out to stop the play, and it's going to stop being successful. The problem with GLB is there's no way to adjust in game...well...no effective way to do it. You just set your tactics and hope for the best. People take advantage of this knowing you won't be able to change anything, and there's really nothing you can do about it.
You'd never see an NFL team get fooled by the same play like 100 times in a row in one game.
I don't really know how that could be solved, but it's a problem with today's sim.
Originally posted by Sik Wit It
I don't know how this could be done, but there should be a way for defenses to somewhat "key" in on a play after a while. If you faced a team that was running it inside on the strongside 100% of the time, sooner or later you are going to just all sell out to stop the play, and it's going to stop being successful. The problem with GLB is there's no way to adjust in game...well...no effective way to do it. You just set your tactics and hope for the best. People take advantage of this knowing you won't be able to change anything, and there's really nothing you can do about it.
You'd never see an NFL team get fooled by the same play like 100 times in a row in one game.
I don't really know how that could be solved, but it's a problem with today's sim.
djgomez33
offline
offline
Originally posted by cwrujosh
Originally posted by djgomez33
Anyone find it odd none of the big Evil Monkey trolls have popped in? I don't. It's not like they wouldn't have seen this thread in the last 3 hours it has been up.
It's not a discussion about MEM, none of this pertains to any one team.
I agree with you that it's not about MEM. However, like mentioned early, some teams try to play with a 'level of respect for the game,' while others continue to exploit obvious flaws over and over.
Originally posted by djgomez33
Anyone find it odd none of the big Evil Monkey trolls have popped in? I don't. It's not like they wouldn't have seen this thread in the last 3 hours it has been up.
It's not a discussion about MEM, none of this pertains to any one team.
I agree with you that it's not about MEM. However, like mentioned early, some teams try to play with a 'level of respect for the game,' while others continue to exploit obvious flaws over and over.
cwrujosh
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sik Wit It
My post in our USA Pro team rankings forum:
Originally posted by Sik Wit It
I don't know how this could be done, but there should be a way for defenses to somewhat "key" in on a play after a while. If you faced a team that was running it inside on the strongside 100% of the time, sooner or later you are going to just all sell out to stop the play, and it's going to stop being successful. The problem with GLB is there's no way to adjust in game...well...no effective way to do it. You just set your tactics and hope for the best. People take advantage of this knowing you won't be able to change anything, and there's really nothing you can do about it.
You'd never see an NFL team get fooled by the same play like 100 times in a row in one game.
I don't really know how that could be solved, but it's a problem with today's sim.
The "solve" is actually pretty easy, and it's the only way it could work - when the play is run, the defense gets a total attribute boost for that one play. Or conversely, the offense is nerfed each progressive time.
The second major issue this brings up is the total inadequacy of the PB. It is horrid.
My post in our USA Pro team rankings forum:
Originally posted by Sik Wit It
I don't know how this could be done, but there should be a way for defenses to somewhat "key" in on a play after a while. If you faced a team that was running it inside on the strongside 100% of the time, sooner or later you are going to just all sell out to stop the play, and it's going to stop being successful. The problem with GLB is there's no way to adjust in game...well...no effective way to do it. You just set your tactics and hope for the best. People take advantage of this knowing you won't be able to change anything, and there's really nothing you can do about it.
You'd never see an NFL team get fooled by the same play like 100 times in a row in one game.
I don't really know how that could be solved, but it's a problem with today's sim.
The "solve" is actually pretty easy, and it's the only way it could work - when the play is run, the defense gets a total attribute boost for that one play. Or conversely, the offense is nerfed each progressive time.
The second major issue this brings up is the total inadequacy of the PB. It is horrid.
cwrujosh
offline
offline
Originally posted by djgomez33
Originally posted by cwrujosh
Originally posted by djgomez33
Anyone find it odd none of the big Evil Monkey trolls have popped in? I don't. It's not like they wouldn't have seen this thread in the last 3 hours it has been up.
It's not a discussion about MEM, none of this pertains to any one team.
I agree with you that it's not about MEM. However, like mentioned early, some teams try to play with a 'level of respect for the game,' while others continue to exploit obvious flaws over and over.
IMHO, the problem is not with exploiters but their ability to do so. That problem lies squarely with Bort.
Originally posted by cwrujosh
Originally posted by djgomez33
Anyone find it odd none of the big Evil Monkey trolls have popped in? I don't. It's not like they wouldn't have seen this thread in the last 3 hours it has been up.
It's not a discussion about MEM, none of this pertains to any one team.
I agree with you that it's not about MEM. However, like mentioned early, some teams try to play with a 'level of respect for the game,' while others continue to exploit obvious flaws over and over.
IMHO, the problem is not with exploiters but their ability to do so. That problem lies squarely with Bort.
Last edited Mar 16, 2009 16:18:50
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
