User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > North American Pro League > USA Conference > USA PRO WEST WEEK 1 Rankings and Predictions
Page:
 
CrushSickels
offline
Link
 
I really think i hate jrry32 .... but refuse to take the bait ...


I will restate what TRUELY meant ... then we can drop this and let the proving happen during the season ..

I do think that putting us at 15 was a bit low .. .. (but who am i to decide) I was trying to say that had we not lost in OT we could very well (imo we would have) won the league and it wouldnt have been a team that backed in ...

I also believe that we have been given space to crawl up ...

That being said ... can we move on ... ?
 
WiSeIVIaN
offline
Link
 
So Jrry, any team that didn't win their conference and moved up, backed into that higher league? Based on what? How promotions/relegations USED TO work?

If there are 5 spots open in the west, and the 5 best teams move up, its retarded to call that backing in, since we in fact got in under how promotions work NOW. The only way to back into a league imo would be to be swapped into it.

My definition of backing in- To be granted a promotion based on something other than merit. (ie "Bob backed in to the vice president job because his father owns the company"). It'd be retarded to say that "Bob backed into the vice pesident job because the former VP quit/was fired" DUCY?

Have fun with your own definition, but don't go preaching it as fact my friend. Your a cool guy jrry, but arguing definitions of phrases not in the dictionary as fact isn't gonna cut it.

This all is different than the point at any rate, which was the phrasing of CV's OP implied we don't belong here (not to mention we were the only team 'flagged' for backing in).

I like the predictions and keep them coming with whatever phrasing you want CV, but you fellas need to stop jumping on my boy crush like he just killed your savior...

The fact that I even had to make these posts saddens me tbh...
 
RagingBoredom
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
It depends on your definition of backing in. If it's a team not winning their conference and getting in, a good portion of the teams on that list backed in. If your definition is a team getting here that didn't deserve it, we didn't back in by any means.


jrry, it might be a good idea for you to actually read posts from the person that you're disagreeing with before you decide to respond.

EDIT: Damn it Wise, you beat me.
Last edited Feb 25, 2009 14:12:42
 
ryanbrock
offline
Link
 
MEM is overrated.
 
kadafitcd
offline
Link
 
Ok I guess I worded it so badly that you didn't understand me either... Let me break down what I said then I will respond to what you said.

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
islander and rj (and according to you everyone) took Crushes comments to be whining about our ranking, which it wasn't. Rather he was just pointing out that saying we backed in is an unfair cheapshot.


Originally posted by kadafitcd
Man up. You didn't like how he said your team backed in. I would respect you not liking that. Just don't be all of the sudden saying, "I was agreeing we backed in..." BS. You didn't back in and you know it. Show CV who's boss!


I said the same thing you just corrected me on. He didn't like it being said that you guys backed in. I agree that you didn't...

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
No one is saying we agree the wording, and you comparing me to A-rod is a bit retarded tbh.


Originally posted by kadafitcd
He's pulling an A-Roid and only saying stuff now because he got caught.


I was comparing HIM to A-Rod not you...

Basically I was telling Crush to stop back peddling. We all took it as it was meant to be taken. The other guys jumped him because he was "whining". And he was, whether he wants to admit it or not. Too many people have sticks up their asses trying to be everyones favorite. I'll call it how I see it on here. So did crush. So stop back peddling, that is all.

 
12thKnight
offline
Link
 
Jesus, guys.

Everyone who's here deserves to be here. If you won an AAA trophy, then yeah, you deserve to be here. If you were in AAA and had a good enough record to replace a gutjob team in Pro, then yeah, you deserve to be here too. And if you're that one bastard team from single-A who swapped with a gutting Pro team a few seasons ago and you've hung in there and gone twelve rounds with the best GLB has to offer, then hell, even you deserve to be here.

Enough said. Play ball.
 
CrushSickels
offline
Link
 
Not back peddling ... read my first post ... read my 2nd post .... keep on reading ...

ive never changed my stance ....

now that a good thread has been hijacked ... maybe someone wants to make a new thread about this if further clarification is needed
 
The Duff Man
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jaxx
This year in the West will be be my first time in GLB there is not a clear 2 teams everyone knows will be relegated. It could very easily send down former champs. this entire season is like being in a very long playoff.


Ideally this would be the case. But as we have seen in past seasons, there will be teams that gut mid-season. It is hard to keep a team motivated when your only battle cry is "Let's not get relegated!"

Even if you "win" you are still facing the same prospect next season. A fight to remain in Pros and no hope whatsoever of making the playoffs.

Fun....
 
kadafitcd
offline
Link
 
Last thing I'm saying...

I think it was the whole.. "if that's how you want to look at it" that set everyone off.

in your 2nd post you said...

Originally posted by CrushSickles
and i was saying i can see how that can be considered "backing" into the league ...


That is where I thought you were back peddling.

Honestly I was just saying that you should have just stuck with it. Because I agree that you didn't back in to the league, and I'm sure many others do as well. I won't keep bringing this up. I just wanted to clarify one last time so that you don't think I'm too much of an ass.
Last edited Feb 25, 2009 14:37:27
 
Sik Wit It
offline
Link
 
Okay Wiseman...you know me and all...but lets face it...you backed in. It may not fit your definition, but you got promoted not because you won the title game, but because spots had to be filled here so the crap teams could move down. Who cares what he called it? We know what happened no matter what label you put on it. I know the Wolfpack and Navigators backed in too. That doesn't mean he's disrespecting your team by saying that. It's nothing to be ashamed of. USA AAA2 was a very tough league and it was by no means easy to promote the standard way. Just prove you belong here. Be damn proud you backed in. Sure it would have been better to earn it the old way, but hey...you're in the big show now, and that's all that matters...not what you did in the past. Take it as an opportunity to prove yourself to USA Pro. CV is fair with his rankings, so he will move you up if you deserve to be moved up. Remember these are preseason rankings based on last season, off-season acquisitions, and probably some looking at pre-season games. Look at his rankings at the beginning of Season 7:

Originally posted by
1. Monmouth Evil Monkeys--Monkeys over the Red Wolves 48-10 Finished Regular season 1 On the nose
2. Honolulu Hurricane Warriors--HHW over the Madcats 56-14 Finished 3 -1
3. San Francisco Fire--Fire Over K-ZOO 35-24 Finished 5 -2
4. Para Burglars--Parma over the Pushovers 35-28 Finished 10 -6
5. Minnesota Marauders--Minnesota over the Rage 42-10 Finished 4 -1
6. Las Vegas Freebirds--DDL over Vegas 31-28 Finished 6 on the nose
7. Dallas Orange Bloods--Shockers over Dallas 35-24 Finished 14 -7
8. Bourbon Street Bullies--Bullies over Philly 41-17 Finished 7 -1
9. South Bay Spartans--SBS over the Termites 255-0 Finished 11 -2
10. Dallas Vaqueros--Washington over Dallas 35-21 Finished 13 -3
11. Oklahoma City Thunderstorm--OCT over the Gamblers 38-20 Finished 9 +2
12. Richmond Rebel Yell--RRY over the Pirates 28-27 Finished 8 +4
13. Lincoln Navigators--Lincoln over Doomsday 200-0 +11
14. Columbus Bucks--OFG over the Bucks 42-10Finished 12 +2
15. Kaneohe Daggers--Maulers over the Daggers 57- Finished 15 On the nose
16. Anchorage Penguins--Elvis' over the Penguins 255-0 Finished 16 On the nose


Parma didn't perform even closely to what they were expected to do here. Lincoln was rated 13 (we also backed in), The Orangebloods (champs of AAA2 as you know) eventually gutted, MM stepped it up, etc.

Lots of things change.
 
RagingBoredom
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by kadafitcd
Last thing I'm saying...

I think it was the whole.. "if that's how you want to look at it" that set everyone off.

in your 2nd post you said...

Originally posted by CrushSickles

and i was saying i can see how that can be considered "backing" into the league ...


That is where I thought you were back peddling.

Honestly I was just saying that you should have just stuck with it. Because I agree that you didn't back in to the league, and I'm sure many others do as well. I won't keep bringing this up. I just wanted to clarify one last time so that you don't think I'm too much of an ass.


I can definitely see where you're coming from because when I read that line, I had to do a bit of a double-take. But I'm 100% positive that Crush was rushing his post and meant to say can't instead of can.
 
kadafitcd
offline
Link
 
Sik, damnit. No one here backed in...

Edited to save myself!
Last edited Feb 25, 2009 14:53:31
 
jfbueno
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ryanbrock
MEM is overrated.


1 conference championship would say otherwise. The Navs on the other hand...
 
cbtd10
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ryanbrock
MEM is overrated.


 
Buccs99
offline
Link
 
vikingsssssssss
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.