Warrior General Games

Quite turning the forums into a soap opera. If I hear one more word about a former employee and the drama that ensued, I'm gonna shut the forums down.

Then you can all go cry in the Pokemon forums about it. http://www.pokemon.com/us/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAdLruOIKmA

Originally posted by ianthepeon
Even if only 10% of it was true.....that's knowledge that everyone doesn't have.

everything you read on the internet is true though

Originally posted by fast420
everything you read on the internet is true though

I'm a French model FYI

Originally posted by fast420
everything you read on the internet is true though

i'm a french model.. bonjour

As someone who didn't get to read Catch's post before it was taken down.....I don't think it's fair that some got to see it. Even if only 10% of it was true.....that's knowledge that everyone doesn't have.Originally posted by ateam1026
it wasn't much knowledge - more truth of glb behind the scenes

The SA stuff isn't just staff info

Originally posted by Darktanian
Quite turning the forums into a soap opera. If I hear one more word about a former employee and the drama that ensued, I'm gonna shut the forums down.

Shut your piehole!

Originally posted by Darktanian
Quite turning the forums into a soap opera. If I hear one more word about a former employee and the drama that ensued, I'm gonna shut the forums down.

Then you can all go cry in the Pokemon forums about it. http://www.pokemon.com/us/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAdLruOIKmA

Don't click on the thread.

Problem solved.

Originally posted by maxxmisery
I'm a French model FYI

and i believe you

Disclaimer: I am not acting as a lawyer in this post. I am only posting my knowledge as a layperson.

The only legal reason not to respond is that GLB might say something that will be used as evidence against them in future litigation. The only privacy issues that they could claim with catch's disclosures are trade secrets or confidential information if he had a contractual agreement to keep the information he learned on the job confidential. Otherwise, he is free to disclose what he wants. As someone stated earlier, he is essentially judgment proof due to his financial situation, so the only remedy they could be looking for in a lawsuit is an injunction against him disclosing the above allegedly confidential information.

Assuming he did not sign any type of confidentiality agreement and he is not disclosing any trade secrets (though GLB certainly has trade secrets, nothing currently on his website could qualify as a trade secret), the refusal to offer a substantive response just indicates that he offered a number of truths on the website that they do not want to respond to because they would either have to (1) acknowledge the truth of his assertions or (2) lie in order to deny the truth of those assertions. At this point, their reaction to catch seems to be more bully tactics than anything with a real bite. Depending on how financially viable Warrior Games really is, they could try to use litigation to put him in a money bind. But if what they told him is true, they don't have the financial capability to use the cost of litigation as a motivator to keep him from talking.

In the end, anything other than a substantive response to his claims as well as more transparency for the user base is the only way GLB can save face in this matter. But given its history of being incredibly secretive and using KGB tactics to silence any information they don't want out, I doubt that's likely.

Originally posted by dahman32


Definitely a multi of one of the admins.

Also, I wish mojames weren't banned right now. This thread is ripe for .gifs.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Disclaimer: I am not acting as a lawyer in this post. I am only posting my knowledge as a layperson.

The only legal reason not to respond is that GLB might say something that will be used as evidence against them in future litigation. The only privacy issues that they could claim with catch's disclosures are trade secrets or confidential information if he had a contractual agreement to keep the information he learned on the job confidential. Otherwise, he is free to disclose what he wants. As someone stated earlier, he is essentially judgment proof due to his financial situation, so the only remedy they could be looking for in a lawsuit is an injunction against him disclosing the above allegedly confidential information.

Assuming he did not sign any type of confidentiality agreement and he is not disclosing any trade secrets (though GLB certainly has trade secrets, nothing currently on his website could qualify as a trade secret), the refusal to offer a substantive response just indicates that he offered a number of truths on the website that they do not want to respond to because they would either have to (1) acknowledge the truth of his assertions or (2) lie in order to deny the truth of those assertions. At this point, their reaction to catch seems to be more bully tactics than anything with a real bite. Depending on how financially viable Warrior Games really is, they could try to use litigation to put him in a money bind. But if what they told him is true, they don't have the financial capability to use the cost of litigation as a motivator to keep him from talking.

In the end, anything other than a substantive response to his claims as well as more transparency for the user base is the only way GLB can save face in this matter. But given its history of being incredibly secretive and using KGB tactics to silence any information they don't want out, I doubt that's likely.



Wow, a LHF post I can believe in. One of the very few things I believe in that's GLB related today.

Remember when this game finally revealed that one of the biggest trolls and flamers in this game's history is actually a member of their staff?

How much of this is related to ObamaCare