well considering a lot of LB's are built like CB's and perform the same duties... I don't see how this isn't relevant?
Originally posted by Homage
well considering a lot of LB's are built like CB's and perform the same duties... I don't see how this isn't relevant?
Maybe because they play different positions and are used differently by the DC. When Hood's LBs start lining up as CBs then we can make the comparison. Until then, it's just bolick trying skew the stats to appear in his favor when all they really do is support the argument that my CBs are good.
well considering a lot of LB's are built like CB's and perform the same duties... I don't see how this isn't relevant?
Maybe because they play different positions and are used differently by the DC. When Hood's LBs start lining up as CBs then we can make the comparison. Until then, it's just bolick trying skew the stats to appear in his favor when all they really do is support the argument that my CBs are good.
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Maybe because they play different positions and are used differently by the DC. When Hood's LBs start lining up as CBs then we can make the comparison. Until then, it's just bolick trying skew the stats to appear in his favor when all they really do is support the argument that my CBs are good.
uh wat... are you trying to say there aren't HB's and FB's and TE's built like WR's and don't perform similarly on their rolls?
Maybe because they play different positions and are used differently by the DC. When Hood's LBs start lining up as CBs then we can make the comparison. Until then, it's just bolick trying skew the stats to appear in his favor when all they really do is support the argument that my CBs are good.
uh wat... are you trying to say there aren't HB's and FB's and TE's built like WR's and don't perform similarly on their rolls?
Robbnva
online
online
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
According to bolick, we should look at the performance of LBs and Safeties in order to judge the quality of a CB's build. /bolicklogic
And you should just fail to include any facts that might hurt your argument.
See Balick knows nothing about football
According to bolick, we should look at the performance of LBs and Safeties in order to judge the quality of a CB's build. /bolicklogic
And you should just fail to include any facts that might hurt your argument.
See Balick knows nothing about football
Originally posted by Homage
uh wat... are you trying to say there aren't HB's and FB's and TE's built like WR's and don't perform similarly on their rolls?
I'm saying LBs aren't and don't have to be built similarly to CBs and that they are used differently. And not all HBs, FBs, and TEs (what's up with the possessive?) are built like WRs. Many aren't at all and some only have a little bit of catching. The comparison isn't valid and you only make yourself look biased and/or stupid by trying to argue otherwise.
uh wat... are you trying to say there aren't HB's and FB's and TE's built like WR's and don't perform similarly on their rolls?
I'm saying LBs aren't and don't have to be built similarly to CBs and that they are used differently. And not all HBs, FBs, and TEs (what's up with the possessive?) are built like WRs. Many aren't at all and some only have a little bit of catching. The comparison isn't valid and you only make yourself look biased and/or stupid by trying to argue otherwise.
Robbnva
online
online
Originally posted by Homage
uh wat... are you trying to say there aren't HB's and FB's and TE's built like WR's and don't perform similarly on their rolls?
When comparing stats to decide who the best CB is, LBs and Safeties don't count.
It's comparing apples to oranges, even it an orange looks like an apple.
uh wat... are you trying to say there aren't HB's and FB's and TE's built like WR's and don't perform similarly on their rolls?
When comparing stats to decide who the best CB is, LBs and Safeties don't count.
It's comparing apples to oranges, even it an orange looks like an apple.
Originally posted by Dr. Showtime
I'm p sure there are lots of 160 speed and 85 catching TE
And I'm pretty sure there are a lot of 150 strength and 90 blocking TEs. How many 150 strength and 90 blocking WRs do you know of?
I'm p sure there are lots of 160 speed and 85 catching TE
And I'm pretty sure there are a lot of 150 strength and 90 blocking TEs. How many 150 strength and 90 blocking WRs do you know of?
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
And I'm pretty sure there are a lot of 150 strength and 90 blocking TEs. How many 150 strength and 90 blocking WRs do you know of?
Well we aren't comparing how many times CB's have been pancaked are we?
And I'm pretty sure there are a lot of 150 strength and 90 blocking TEs. How many 150 strength and 90 blocking WRs do you know of?
Well we aren't comparing how many times CB's have been pancaked are we?
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
I'm saying LBs aren't and don't have to be built similarly to CBs and that they are used differently. And not all HBs, FBs, and TEs (what's up with the possessive?) are built like WRs. Many aren't at all and some only have a little bit of catching. The comparison isn't valid and you only make yourself look biased and/or stupid by trying to argue otherwise.
Ok. But Coverage LB's are built almost exactly the same as CB's. In fact they have the same majors.
And pretty much all the TE's and scat backs that out for receptions have close to if not the same stats as most WR's.
And LOL@trying to give grammar lessons on abbreviations.
I'm saying LBs aren't and don't have to be built similarly to CBs and that they are used differently. And not all HBs, FBs, and TEs (what's up with the possessive?) are built like WRs. Many aren't at all and some only have a little bit of catching. The comparison isn't valid and you only make yourself look biased and/or stupid by trying to argue otherwise.
Ok. But Coverage LB's are built almost exactly the same as CB's. In fact they have the same majors.
And pretty much all the TE's and scat backs that out for receptions have close to if not the same stats as most WR's.
And LOL@trying to give grammar lessons on abbreviations.
Edited by Homage on May 9, 2012 13:30:48
Originally posted by Homage
Ok. But Coverage LB's are built almost exactly the same as CB's. In fact they have the same majors.
And pretty much all the TE's and scat backs that out for receptions have close to if not the same stats as most WR's.
And LOL@trying to give grammar lessons on abbreviations.
And I'm sure all those scat backs and TEs are running the exact same routes, are lining up in the same position, are the exact same size, have the exact same VAs, and have the exact same AEQ. And I'm also sure that the DCs using those coverage LBs aren't concerned about them stopping the run at all or that they might get lined up against a stronger TE.
Ok. But Coverage LB's are built almost exactly the same as CB's. In fact they have the same majors.
And pretty much all the TE's and scat backs that out for receptions have close to if not the same stats as most WR's.
And LOL@trying to give grammar lessons on abbreviations.
And I'm sure all those scat backs and TEs are running the exact same routes, are lining up in the same position, are the exact same size, have the exact same VAs, and have the exact same AEQ. And I'm also sure that the DCs using those coverage LBs aren't concerned about them stopping the run at all or that they might get lined up against a stronger TE.
Originally posted by Homage
Ok. But Coverage LB's are built almost exactly the same as CB's. In fact they have the same majors.
And pretty much all the TE's and scat backs that out for receptions have close to if not the same stats as most WR's.
And LOL@trying to give grammar lessons on abbreviations.
Production is not 100% build related. That's what Homage would tell me.
Ok. But Coverage LB's are built almost exactly the same as CB's. In fact they have the same majors.
And pretty much all the TE's and scat backs that out for receptions have close to if not the same stats as most WR's.
And LOL@trying to give grammar lessons on abbreviations.
Production is not 100% build related. That's what Homage would tell me.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Donk3yMan
Production is not 100% build related. That's what Homage would tell me.
That's what anyone would tell you.
Production is not 100% build related. That's what Homage would tell me.
That's what anyone would tell you.
Originally posted by Donk3yMan
Production is not 100% build related. That's what Homage would tell me.
But that appears to be what he is claiming if he wants to ignore the differences between LBs and CBs.
Production is not 100% build related. That's what Homage would tell me.
But that appears to be what he is claiming if he wants to ignore the differences between LBs and CBs.
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by Donk3yMan
Production is not 100% build related. That's what Homage would tell me.
It's not. There's more to it.
But to ignore that other positions undergo the same situations as a CB is ludicrous. It's entirely relevant.
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
And I'm sure all those scat backs and TEs are running the exact same routes, are lining up in the same position, are the exact same size, have the exact same VAs, and have the exact same AEQ. And I'm also sure that the DCs using those coverage LBs aren't concerned about them stopping the run at all or that they might get lined up against a stronger TE.
it's cute you think the routes ran actually matter in the sim right now. It would if the QB actually led the receiver, but every fucking throw is contested.
Production is not 100% build related. That's what Homage would tell me.
It's not. There's more to it.
But to ignore that other positions undergo the same situations as a CB is ludicrous. It's entirely relevant.
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
And I'm sure all those scat backs and TEs are running the exact same routes, are lining up in the same position, are the exact same size, have the exact same VAs, and have the exact same AEQ. And I'm also sure that the DCs using those coverage LBs aren't concerned about them stopping the run at all or that they might get lined up against a stronger TE.
it's cute you think the routes ran actually matter in the sim right now. It would if the QB actually led the receiver, but every fucking throw is contested.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
