User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Team Press Releases > USA BBB #11 Power Rankings
Page:
 
Pjkuchta
offline
Link
 
No offence but it could also be pointed towards making better decisions in the player/personel Dept.
Last edited May 26, 2008 20:20:01
 
reaper13
offline
Link
 
Just curious how you scout a guy to determine that 12 games into the season he has a habit of developing fumblitis? My RBs carrying and strength has went up alot since the beginning of the season and he has fumbled alot lately.....
 
chicagopax
offline
Link
 
Team Chemistry
Overall 16
Offense 16
 
gRryNn
offline
Link
 
Something I found on the main forum

Originally posted by bort
Seriously, folks, chemistry has a maximum effect of -9% on SOME of your players' skills. I'd look elsewhere to blame your losses on (energy, confidence/morale, lack of depth, gameplan, etc).


Last edited May 26, 2008 20:56:12
 
reaper13
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by gRryNn
Something I found on the main forum

Originally posted by bort

Seriously, folks, chemistry has a maximum effect of -9% on SOME of your players' skills. I'd look elsewhere to blame your losses on (energy, confidence/morale, lack of depth, gameplan, etc).






i really think that is a crock of shiite....
 
chicagopax
offline
Link
 
Can't be completely true, look at Serrao's team, they were undefeated, now their chemistry sucks and they dropped 2 games.

Maybe Bort messed something up [on that rare occasion]

I dont think Serrao would give up on his gameplanning because he made the playoffs, but that would be something that'd need to be answered by the man himself.
 
gRryNn
offline
Link
 
here's the link to where I found the quote from bort ... don't shoot me ... I just found it =)

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=214729


Yo ... it's still pretty bad ... -9% to some players skills is a big cut. -9% from a RB's carrying can be the difference between fumbling and not. -9% from a WR's catching can be the difference between catching and not.

Bort never said who the "SOME players" were ... so ... I think -9% is still HUGE.



Last edited May 26, 2008 21:18:25
 
Niedziel
offline
Link
 
FOr mee chemistry is a reat thing!
I should matters a lot!
Football is a TEAM game, bunch of stars that aren't training together will suck!
Team spirit, working together, and practising together are most important!
 
Dmac2008
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Niedziel
FOr mee chemistry is a reat thing!
I should matters a lot!
Football is a TEAM game, bunch of stars that aren't training together will suck!
Team spirit, working together, and practising together are most important!


What? LOL. Can I get a translation please?
 
Pjkuchta
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by chicagopax
Can't be completely true, look at Serrao's team, they were undefeated, now their chemistry sucks and they dropped 2 games.

Maybe Bort messed something up [on that rare occasion]

I dont think Serrao would give up on his gameplanning because he made the playoffs, but that would be something that'd need to be answered by the man himself.


Their chemistry has sucked all year. Why the big change now?
Last edited May 27, 2008 05:12:10
 
Pjkuchta
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by gRryNn


Bort never said who the "SOME players" were ... so ... I think -9% is still HUGE.




He said SOME of your players SKILLS. Not some of your players.
 
gRryNn
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by pjkuchta
Originally posted by gRryNn



Bort never said who the "SOME players" were ... so ... I think -9% is still HUGE.




He said SOME of your players SKILLS. Not some of your players.


roger that ... so ... from SOME of your players SKILLS - which players are they? see my point ... it still encompasses -9% to some players skills ... and which players are still unknown ... also which skill(s) the -9% hits is unknown as well.

 
reaper13
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by pjkuchta
Originally posted by chicagopax

Can't be completely true, look at Serrao's team, they were undefeated, now their chemistry sucks and they dropped 2 games.

Maybe Bort messed something up [on that rare occasion]

I dont think Serrao would give up on his gameplanning because he made the playoffs, but that would be something that'd need to be answered by the man himself.


Their chemistry has sucked all year. Why the big change now?




i have to disagree, DVs chemistry was really high until Serraro started adding players to replace his own.......

 
Reject
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by gRryNn
Originally posted by pjkuchta

Originally posted by gRryNn




Bort never said who the "SOME players" were ... so ... I think -9% is still HUGE.




He said SOME of your players SKILLS. Not some of your players.


roger that ... so ... from SOME of your players SKILLS - which players are they? see my point ... it still encompasses -9% to some players skills ... and which players are still unknown ... also which skill(s) the -9% hits is unknown as well.



I think it means it drops a maximum of 9% from every player on the team, but from different stats at each position.
 
Pjkuchta
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by reaper13
Originally posted by pjkuchta

Originally posted by chicagopax


Can't be completely true, look at Serrao's team, they were undefeated, now their chemistry sucks and they dropped 2 games.

Maybe Bort messed something up [on that rare occasion]

I dont think Serrao would give up on his gameplanning because he made the playoffs, but that would be something that'd need to be answered by the man himself.


Their chemistry has sucked all year. Why the big change now?




i have to disagree, DVs chemistry was really high until Serraro started adding players to replace his own.......




True, altough that was within the first half of the season, but even when he played us, he was at a 10 in chemistry. That was week 8 or 9 (I think). so That doesnt explain the winning streak, then dropping 2 games in a row. I am not saying that I have any clue why they dropped 2 games but I personally think that the chemistry debate is un-founded. It may have played a part in the 2 losses but there must be an underlying reason that no one but Serrao could answer. If I was him I wouldnt answer anyways. So it is a point that we can debate constantly but will never resolve.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.