Outside of the moderators and ee. I guess I just can't see how it wasn't somewhat random.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Goal Line Blitz 2 - Alpha Testing Information - Q&A
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by Robbnva
It wasnt random though. Stop pretending it was.
Well, if Aaron was right, then the people who spent the most on flex got picked. The people who spend the most on flex in GLB1 that are testing GLB2 are the active testers. People who cared enough about playing the first game and want to make the second game better.
The mods that were picked are some of the most active testers, it is the people that I've never heard of who post one thing in the GLB2 forums and then never comment on the forums again that were chosen at random. At least I hope so.
It wasnt random though. Stop pretending it was.
Well, if Aaron was right, then the people who spent the most on flex got picked. The people who spend the most on flex in GLB1 that are testing GLB2 are the active testers. People who cared enough about playing the first game and want to make the second game better.
The mods that were picked are some of the most active testers, it is the people that I've never heard of who post one thing in the GLB2 forums and then never comment on the forums again that were chosen at random. At least I hope so.
Originally posted by bhall43
Outside of the moderators and ee. I guess I just can't see how it wasn't somewhat random.
Did any of testers offered to close that and forget bout new one and we all play old one
Outside of the moderators and ee. I guess I just can't see how it wasn't somewhat random.
Did any of testers offered to close that and forget bout new one and we all play old one
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Outside of the moderators and ee. I guess I just can't see how it wasn't somewhat random.
Aherns and TT were not random. I could pick a list of others if I had the actual list.
More like hand picked 20 or so guys and randomized the rest.
I'd believe that
Outside of the moderators and ee. I guess I just can't see how it wasn't somewhat random.
Aherns and TT were not random. I could pick a list of others if I had the actual list.
More like hand picked 20 or so guys and randomized the rest.
I'd believe that
Originally posted by Time Trial
Well, if Aaron was right, then the people who spent the most on flex got picked. The people who spend the most on flex in GLB1 that are testing GLB2 are the active testers. People who cared enough about playing the first game and want to make the second game better.
The mods that were picked are some of the most active testers, it is the people that I've never heard of who post one thing in the GLB2 forums and then never comment on the forums again that were chosen at random. At least I hope so.
We're you paid to say that?))
Well, if Aaron was right, then the people who spent the most on flex got picked. The people who spend the most on flex in GLB1 that are testing GLB2 are the active testers. People who cared enough about playing the first game and want to make the second game better.
The mods that were picked are some of the most active testers, it is the people that I've never heard of who post one thing in the GLB2 forums and then never comment on the forums again that were chosen at random. At least I hope so.
We're you paid to say that?))
Larry Roadgrader
offline
offline
Originally posted by Robbnva
More like hand picked 20 or so guys and randomized the rest.
I'd believe that
I don't understand the complaint--if you or I or anyone else were putting together an advisory committee are you suggesting we WOULDN'T want to hand-pick a good chunk of it?
More like hand picked 20 or so guys and randomized the rest.
I'd believe that
I don't understand the complaint--if you or I or anyone else were putting together an advisory committee are you suggesting we WOULDN'T want to hand-pick a good chunk of it?
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
I don't understand the complaint--if you or I or anyone else were putting together an advisory committee are you suggesting we WOULDN'T want to hand-pick a good chunk of it?
My complaint is if they wanted to just hand pick people, just do it and don't tell anyone. Don't run a "contest" and rig the results.
I don't understand the complaint--if you or I or anyone else were putting together an advisory committee are you suggesting we WOULDN'T want to hand-pick a good chunk of it?
My complaint is if they wanted to just hand pick people, just do it and don't tell anyone. Don't run a "contest" and rig the results.
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by Robbnva
Aherns and TT were not random. I could pick a list of others if I had the actual list.
More like hand picked 20 or so guys and randomized the rest.
I'd believe that
I do have experience in testing, coding, and design, so it is possible that mine was selected for reasons other than my flex account. Also I'm active in the FAQ forums and whatnot, posted a lot of bugs back in the day, and do a lot of test builds. There were plenty of reasons that they might have selected me. Also I've never been forum banned.
Aherns and TT were not random. I could pick a list of others if I had the actual list.
More like hand picked 20 or so guys and randomized the rest.
I'd believe that
I do have experience in testing, coding, and design, so it is possible that mine was selected for reasons other than my flex account. Also I'm active in the FAQ forums and whatnot, posted a lot of bugs back in the day, and do a lot of test builds. There were plenty of reasons that they might have selected me. Also I've never been forum banned.
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by dude34
We're you paid to say that?))
We are you paid to say that?
We're you paid to say that?))
We are you paid to say that?
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Honestly I want some more die hard casual guys in there to give it a look.
Would be a good idea
Honestly I want some more die hard casual guys in there to give it a look.
Would be a good idea
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
