User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pacific Pro League > Oceania Conference > Brisbane Bandits caught up in controversy? Season tarnished? Possible collusion?
Page:
 
joemalaka
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by catspaw27
Simple issue: inactive player.

Simple answer: The player in question is HB Ray Day. He is active again. He has been inactive before, but at least communicates about it. The trade involved a player who was active/inactive. Not a player who is forever dead and gone.

And I notice that no one says anything about the cash to balance the trade. Cash considerations are very important to a team that's rebuilding. You can't just scoff at 150k and say it has no bearing.

From what I see and read, the issue is closed. The Bandits did nothing wrong in the deal. The mods reviewed and approved it.

I have better things to do. Have fun arguing with each other and bashing other owners, agents and players. It's a waste of time.


You answer one of my questions but avoid the latest. Why did you lie about the timeline of events leading to my benching? Added: Why did you lie about the activity (or inactivy status) of the HB traded?
 
joemalaka
offline
Link
 
- catspaw27 does not want the PM's between himself and me released. I have asked him permission to post the PM's publicly. Nothing. I have asked his permission to allow someone to view the PM's by logging into my account, and he won't allow it. For #2 he does have a debatable reason, but why not #1? Why doesn't he want the complete PM's public?

- catspaw27 gave out to at least one person (and possibly more) parts of a PM(s) without my permission. catspaw27 only gave parts out to make me look bad and that I threatened him. catspaw27 left out the PM's he first sent me, benching me before I got upset about the situation. So why can catspaw27 give out PM's and I cannot? And why only little parts and not the complete PM's? Drifter admitted this forum that he only saw what he posted and did not see everything.

- catspaw27 claimed to have benched me after I threatened to sabotage the team (Bandits). catspaw gave out limited PM info trying to make it look like I did, but can be seen I did not threaten to sabotage anything....the rest of the PM's were not given out, showing only limited editted info is giving out by catspaw27. 1) I never threatened to sabotage the team. 2) I was banned and benched at the same time. This was in the first PM I got from catspaw27. 3) After I was benched I told catspaw27 I would not put any level points into my player, as I thought what he was doing was wrong. AFTER I was benched. catspaw27 lying about this and the PM's if released will show this.

- BillyVassi gutted a team.

- catspaw27 and BillYVassi traded with each other. catspaw27 and Brisbane Bandits got two players from the trades.

- When I posted links to threads that questioned BillyVassi, I was immediately banned and benched. At the time it was not known the Bandits benefited from the gutting, so the quick ban and benching made some wonder why so quick.

- catspaw27 claimed the HB was only partly inactive. It was quickly shown the player was inactive for 22 days, 5 days into the season he went inactive. Why did catspaw27 lie about the activity level of the HB in question? Why did catspaw27 post on the private forum for the Brisbane Bandits that the HB was inactive and he was unhappy about it (he did not know the guy was on vacation, anything.....made an example of the player and told the team he didn't want any inactives. catspaw27 was caught lying about the activity level of the HB....why?

- BillyVassi claims only one player was traded, when it was two players. BillyVassi claims he forgot about the other player because it was before the gutting of the team. BillyVassi was shown lying, as the other player traded happened in the same time frame. BillyVassi caught lying twice.

- I have had people question on why I did this and say it is wrong. I can understand that thinking, even though I disagree. But I have not been called a liar here, just called all sorts of other things. BillyVassi and catspaw27 have been caught lying.

- I had nothing to gain by any of this. I thought it was wrong, especially when I found out about the trades.

- I could go on with the misinformation, avoiding some things while answering others, etc....but the main points are listed above.


It is obvious that GLB admins/mods will do nothing about this. I think something I should...that is my opinion. But since it looks like nothing will I am (and have since all of this) asking catspaw27 to release me when 1st possible. Not sold..not traded...released. I do not now catspaw27 benefitting any further out of all of this. I am telling everyone here and him that I do not want to be sold or traded...if I am I will continue to not level MojoDojo up. Players in real sports play hardball when upset and teams don't trade for upset players if they think they will not produce. So catspaw27 knows I will not do anything to a team he sells or trades me to. Will he still do it? Or will he simply release me? This is the most I can do to try, since nothing will happen to the catspaw27 and BillyVassi.
Last edited May 23, 2008 11:34:17
 
joemalaka
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Klaerth
I'm confused, Cats, as to why you're so adamant against him doing something that /isn't/ breaking the rules, for he has permission, when you yourself broke them by posting those PMs without his permission. Not only that, but just part of them, picking and choosing selectively? If you're so adamant against him revealing the portion that you did not, then it makes it highly suspicious that there must be some sort of incriminating material there, no..?

I'm not saying either way, but if you don't allow him to do this, you are inviting much suspicion and distrust. o.o


He will more than likely avoid this. Hopefully he doesn't, but we will see.
 
lerriuqs
offline
Link
 
Here's a thought Joe - ask for (after all this, I'm sure you'll get it) a trade/release at season's end. You've aired your grievances - time to let it die IMO. Get through the rest of the season and move on to a new team. You won't get any further on this - it's time to move on.
 
joemalaka
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by lerriuqs
Here's a thought Joe - ask for (after all this, I'm sure you'll get it) a trade/release at season's end. You've aired your grievances - time to let it die IMO. Get through the rest of the season and move on to a new team. You won't get any further on this - it's time to move on.


Read my post above..end of it. I told catspaw27 to release me, not trade/sell. I do not want him to benefit any from my player. This is the most I can now do.
 
Ballbright
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by joemalaka
Originally posted by lerriuqs

Here's a thought Joe - ask for (after all this, I'm sure you'll get it) a trade/release at season's end. You've aired your grievances - time to let it die IMO. Get through the rest of the season and move on to a new team. You won't get any further on this - it's time to move on.


Read my post above..end of it. I told catspaw27 to release me, not trade/sell. I do not want him to benefit any from my player. This is the most I can now do.


At the end of the season if you're looking for a home, you are more than welcome on the GBR Sharks. We'll make room for an honest soul....
 
catspaw27
offline
Link
 
From a business standpoint, isn't releasing a player just stupid?

In this case, I will agree with ballbright. It's a good move on his part, and I respect him for 1) bellying up and saying he wants joemalaka and 2) staking a claim early.

It also leaves Mojo Dojo in Oceania Pros, with the ability to come back and haunt the Bandits. Now that's intrigue.

OK, so I will commit that when trading opens back up I will give the GBR Sharks the right of first refusal on Mojo Dojo.

Oh, wait...isn't that collusion? Wasn't it argued that he would need to be offered to every team to make it legal? Just want to make sure we are on the same page here...
 
Ballbright
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by catspaw27
From a business standpoint, isn't releasing a player just stupid?

In this case, I will agree with ballbright. It's a good move on his part, and I respect him for 1) bellying up and saying he wants joemalaka and 2) staking a claim early.

It also leaves Mojo Dojo in Oceania Pros, with the ability to come back and haunt the Bandits. Now that's intrigue.

OK, so I will commit that when trading opens back up I will give the GBR Sharks the right of first refusal on Mojo Dojo.

Oh, wait...isn't that collusion? Wasn't it argued that he would need to be offered to every team to make it legal? Just want to make sure we are on the same page here...


He does need to be offered to every team in the league, and I would be disappointed if you didn't do such.

I was just letting Joe know that he IS wanted by a team in Oceania Pro, and by proxy letting the Bandits know that I would be willing to deal for that player.

It is a bit different in situation that you're attempting to deal a player that doesn't want to be there, and isn't wanted; than say being contacted by the GM of another team who happens to be a player on your team, and being offered a stellar deal to which no one else is privy or has the right to bid against.
Last edited May 23, 2008 12:35:37
 
catspaw27
offline
Link
 
OK, you are the owner of the GBR Sharks and as such I will grant you right of refusal when the market opens back up.

I will post his availability at that time, with no mention of any extenuating circumstances.

joemalaka also owns a team, and he has the ability to buy himself out of his own contract. He has to have first right though.

Agreed?
 
kevins4484
offline
Link
 
holy shit, is the pissing and moaning finally going to be over!

Thank the lord.

Lets go back to talking smack and football, that was alot more fun.

Ballbright, you can go outside now
Last edited May 23, 2008 13:01:57
 
HaplosDog
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ballbright
Originally posted by catspaw27

From a business standpoint, isn't releasing a player just stupid?

In this case, I will agree with ballbright. It's a good move on his part, and I respect him for 1) bellying up and saying he wants joemalaka and 2) staking a claim early.

It also leaves Mojo Dojo in Oceania Pros, with the ability to come back and haunt the Bandits. Now that's intrigue.

OK, so I will commit that when trading opens back up I will give the GBR Sharks the right of first refusal on Mojo Dojo.

Oh, wait...isn't that collusion? Wasn't it argued that he would need to be offered to every team to make it legal? Just want to make sure we are on the same page here...


He does need to be offered to every team in the league, and I would be disappointed if you didn't do such.

I was just letting Joe know that he IS wanted by a team in Oceania Pro, and by proxy letting the Bandits know that I would be willing to deal for that player.

It is a bit different in situation that you're attempting to deal a player that doesn't want to be there, and isn't wanted; than say being contacted by the GM of another team who happens to be a player on your team, and being offered a stellar deal to which no one else is privy or has the right to bid against.


I don't understand why you keep insisting that a player has to be offered to every team in the league. This isn't waivers, it's a trade. In real life, two teams discuss all the time (secretly!!!) about trading players. It is not colluding.
 
joemalaka
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by catspaw27
From a business standpoint, isn't releasing a player just stupid?

In this case, I will agree with ballbright. It's a good move on his part, and I respect him for 1) bellying up and saying he wants joemalaka and 2) staking a claim early.

It also leaves Mojo Dojo in Oceania Pros, with the ability to come back and haunt the Bandits. Now that's intrigue.

OK, so I will commit that when trading opens back up I will give the GBR Sharks the right of first refusal on Mojo Dojo.

Oh, wait...isn't that collusion? Wasn't it argued that he would need to be offered to every team to make it legal? Just want to make sure we are on the same page here...


I have stated I only want a release. You can sit me on the bench paying my salary for another season or release me. You have the right to trade me, but I have already stated what would happen.

Again I do not know catspaw27 benefiting with Mojo Dojo at all. I would rather the player retire than for that to happen. I believe what happened was wrong and this is what I am standing by.

Catspaw has lied about what happened and avoided my points when brought up about those lies. I want nothing at all to do with helping his team in the least bit.
Last edited May 23, 2008 12:53:30
 
wombat killer
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by HaplosDog
Originally posted by Ballbright

Originally posted by catspaw27


From a business standpoint, isn't releasing a player just stupid?

In this case, I will agree with ballbright. It's a good move on his part, and I respect him for 1) bellying up and saying he wants joemalaka and 2) staking a claim early.

It also leaves Mojo Dojo in Oceania Pros, with the ability to come back and haunt the Bandits. Now that's intrigue.

OK, so I will commit that when trading opens back up I will give the GBR Sharks the right of first refusal on Mojo Dojo.

Oh, wait...isn't that collusion? Wasn't it argued that he would need to be offered to every team to make it legal? Just want to make sure we are on the same page here...


He does need to be offered to every team in the league, and I would be disappointed if you didn't do such.

I was just letting Joe know that he IS wanted by a team in Oceania Pro, and by proxy letting the Bandits know that I would be willing to deal for that player.

It is a bit different in situation that you're attempting to deal a player that doesn't want to be there, and isn't wanted; than say being contacted by the GM of another team who happens to be a player on your team, and being offered a stellar deal to which no one else is privy or has the right to bid against.


I don't understand why you keep insisting that a player has to be offered to every team in the league. This isn't waivers, it's a trade. In real life, two teams discuss all the time (secretly!!!) about trading players. It is not colluding.


Agreed. There is nothing wrong with two teams working out a trade assuming both teams benefit.
 
BradyFTW
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ballbright
Originally posted by BradyFTW

Originally posted by Ballbright


Originally posted by BradyFTW



Just drop it, guys. Even if they were colluding, do the rules even say that you can't? It's just not a big deal, really. Everyone should seriously just drop it and get on with things.


Yes, the rules say you can't. You're an owner and you don't know that???

Gutting a colluding are two of the biggest problems in GLB. There are countless threads with suggestions, ideas, fixes and complaints about it.

It is a serious problem, as dishonesty, like what occurred here, make the game no fun for everyone else.


Error 1: I'm not an owner. I'm a GM, who deals exclusively with game-planning. We leave all signing decisions to our owner.

Error 2: It is not against the rules. It may be a 'problem', as subjective as that term is, but the rules do not state that what the Bandits did was illegal. Maybe it will be illegal in the final release, but it isn't now. Deal with it.


My mistake, I assumed you were an owner. Still being a GM and not knowing colluding is illeagal? C'mon guy.

What you seem to imply, and the reason I added a loss of respect for New England, is that you seem to be ok with this. It isn't ok...

Regardless of whether you think it illegal or not (and I don't see how anyone could begin to think it wasn't collusion, but apparently some people don't or won't see it), it is wrong. The entire situation is wrong.

If Billy was an NFL GM, and did what he did you can rest assured he'd be banned from the league, and there is no way in hell that trades would have gone through.

Whether or not you believe that catspaw was "unaware" of what was going on (which would be an like believing Michael Vick had no clue what was going on), what he did was unethical. That so many bandit's players would come the defense of what happened (and the one or two other people who did) is appalling, and speaks volumes about the questionable character of those people.

I'm done with trying to rehash this stuff. It's pretty clear what happened. Billy admitted in this thread that he contacted Catspaw prior to making the trade via PM. If you still believe no collusion occurred after that, you're at best stupidly naive.

As an owner of a gutted team trying to rebuild, I go through the struggle every day of trying to find good players. Some days I get lucky and sign someone, most I don't. That an undefeated team would go to these kinds of lengths to do some backwater deal and bring on more players is disgusting.

As for me, I will continue to put forth that anyone associated with this deal, and those choosing not to condemn it, have a loss of my respect. I will make it my business to make sure every team entering the league every year knows what a group of opportunistic shitbags the bandits are, and what owners are "okay" with it.

The worst part about it is they went from being the team everyone was jealous of for their 13-0 record to a bunch of douchebags overnight for no reason.

JOE has my respect for doing the right thing, speaking out in the face of adversity. For those who don't believe I'd do the same thing--google my name "Ben Allbright" read the article "Am I A Torturer"

Character comes first...even when playing a stupid internet football game...





Shameless self-promotion is for losers. Seriously, you are taking this game *way* too seriously. You're right that this would be a huge problem in the NFL, in large part because, in the business setting, collusion violates federal law, and it would also presumably be grounds for the league losing its anti-trust exemption. You're missing one crucial point, though: this is not the NFL. It's a browser-based football simulator. You're still giving me grief for not knowing that collusion is illegal: quote the GLB rule that says that what Catspaw did wsa illegal. And btw, if you don't get the hypocrisy of calling me out while simultaneously condoning an illegal activity (logging into someone else's account), then I don't know what to tell you.

You keep getting up on your moral high horse with your character-first rhetoric, but in the process you seem to have lost sight of the fact that nothing was done by Catspaw that suggests poor character. He did his job, and didn't break any rules doing it. You'd think that at some point, after multiple other players from multiple other teams with no vested interest in the situation attested that what he did isn't a big deal, you're realize that the only spectacle here is being caused entirely by you.
Last edited May 23, 2008 13:26:04
 
Ballbright
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by catspaw27
OK, you are the owner of the GBR Sharks and as such I will grant you right of refusal when the market opens back up.

I will post his availability at that time, with no mention of any extenuating circumstances.

joemalaka also owns a team, and he has the ability to buy himself out of his own contract. He has to have first right though.

Agreed?


Agreed.


Originally posted by haplosdog
I don't understand why you keep insisting that a player has to be offered to every team in the league. This isn't waivers, it's a trade. In real life, two teams discuss all the time (secretly!!!) about trading players. It is not colluding.


You are correct, however, this player has extenuating circumstances, and I don't ever want to give the appearance of impropriety on my part. I'd rather lose a few games and be above reproach, than to have an undefeated season and be the scorn of the league for deals that looked shady.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.