LHF ded on
Edited by jtrav21 on Dec 10, 2013 20:57:41
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
When? 1999? A&M was a joke while in the Big 12 regardless of your recruiting or coach. It's the same song, different verse for you. The only reason your record looks good is because it's become a joke since you went to the SEC. You've beaten two ranked teams in the last two seasons (only one in conference) and you've beaten up on a bunch of scrubs. You wouldn't be doing any better in the Big 12.
Hanging your hat on 1 ranked win against an overrated OU?
We will win against a ranked team on New Year's Eve.
Y'all keep looking at the past as a way of escaping the present, which is a present that has us as the flagship program in the state by every measure.
When? 1999? A&M was a joke while in the Big 12 regardless of your recruiting or coach. It's the same song, different verse for you. The only reason your record looks good is because it's become a joke since you went to the SEC. You've beaten two ranked teams in the last two seasons (only one in conference) and you've beaten up on a bunch of scrubs. You wouldn't be doing any better in the Big 12.
Hanging your hat on 1 ranked win against an overrated OU?
We will win against a ranked team on New Year's Eve.
Y'all keep looking at the past as a way of escaping the present, which is a present that has us as the flagship program in the state by every measure.
And our strength of schedule has been damn good the past two seasons, so you can stop with the "easy schedule" BS when you play in the freaking Big XII 
Originally posted by RayRay99
Hanging your hat on 1 ranked win against an overrated OU?
We will win against a ranked team on New Year's Eve.
Y'all keep looking at the past as a way of escaping the present, which is a present that has us as the flagship program in the state by every measure.
You're going to hang your hat on beating a Duke team that hasn't won a single game against a ranked opponent either? You might as well name that game the Overranked Teams Who Can't Beat Anyone Good Bowl.
Originally posted by RayRay99
And our strength of schedule has been damn good the past two seasons, so you can stop with the "easy schedule" BS when you play in the freaking Big XII
Strength of schedule doesn't matter if you don't beat any of the good teams on your schedule. You haven't this season and went 2-2 against them last season.
Hanging your hat on 1 ranked win against an overrated OU?
We will win against a ranked team on New Year's Eve.
Y'all keep looking at the past as a way of escaping the present, which is a present that has us as the flagship program in the state by every measure.
You're going to hang your hat on beating a Duke team that hasn't won a single game against a ranked opponent either? You might as well name that game the Overranked Teams Who Can't Beat Anyone Good Bowl.
Originally posted by RayRay99
And our strength of schedule has been damn good the past two seasons, so you can stop with the "easy schedule" BS when you play in the freaking Big XII
Strength of schedule doesn't matter if you don't beat any of the good teams on your schedule. You haven't this season and went 2-2 against them last season.
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Strength of schedule doesn't matter if you don't beat any of the good teams on your schedule. You haven't this season and went 2-2 against them last season.
Combined record of our defeated opponents: 50-49
Combined record of your defeated opponents: 44-52
You were saying?
Strength of schedule doesn't matter if you don't beat any of the good teams on your schedule. You haven't this season and went 2-2 against them last season.
Combined record of our defeated opponents: 50-49
Combined record of your defeated opponents: 44-52
You were saying?
Originally posted by RayRay99
Combined record of our defeated opponents: 50-49
Combined record of your defeated opponents: 44-52
You were saying?
That doesn't disprove anything that I said. Your aggie education is showing.
And you should really subtract any wins against FCS schools from your equation.
Combined record of our defeated opponents: 50-49
Combined record of your defeated opponents: 44-52
You were saying?
That doesn't disprove anything that I said. Your aggie education is showing.
And you should really subtract any wins against FCS schools from your equation.
Edited by Longhornfan1024 on Dec 11, 2013 15:09:25
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
That doesn't disprove anything that I said.
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
And you have no claim that A&M is better than Texas. You have the same record as us even though you had a non-conference slate of powerhouses Rice, Sam Houston, SMU, and UTEP, and you've lost to every ranked team you've played.
You said that we are both 8-4 and no better than Texas, then bashed our schedule. I showed you we had a strong SoS, and our victories were against teams that were better than the teams you beat. That disproves what you said. Your sippy education is showing.
That doesn't disprove anything that I said.
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
And you have no claim that A&M is better than Texas. You have the same record as us even though you had a non-conference slate of powerhouses Rice, Sam Houston, SMU, and UTEP, and you've lost to every ranked team you've played.
You said that we are both 8-4 and no better than Texas, then bashed our schedule. I showed you we had a strong SoS, and our victories were against teams that were better than the teams you beat. That disproves what you said. Your sippy education is showing.
Originally posted by RayRay99
You said that we are both 8-4 and no better than Texas, then bashed our schedule. I showed you we had a strong SoS, and our victories were against teams that were better than the teams you beat. That disproves what you said. Your sippy education is showing.
You posting the combined win/loss record of our defeated opponents out of context does nothing to disprove of what I said. It does nothing to address the fact that we have the same record. It does nothing to address that UT beat a ranked team and A&M has not. It does not take into account the quality of the schedule our opponents played. It does not take into account that A&M played an FCS team and Texas did not. In short, it does nothing to disprove of anything I said. Keep up, little aggie.
And if you were to subtract wins by or against FCS teams, the numbers would get much closer. Or you can do even better and only look at the records of defeated opponents in auto-bid conferences, since wins against teams like Rice, SMU, NMST, etc. are joke wins anyways. If you have to hang your hat on beating a 10 win Rice team, you've already lost the argument.
You said that we are both 8-4 and no better than Texas, then bashed our schedule. I showed you we had a strong SoS, and our victories were against teams that were better than the teams you beat. That disproves what you said. Your sippy education is showing.
You posting the combined win/loss record of our defeated opponents out of context does nothing to disprove of what I said. It does nothing to address the fact that we have the same record. It does nothing to address that UT beat a ranked team and A&M has not. It does not take into account the quality of the schedule our opponents played. It does not take into account that A&M played an FCS team and Texas did not. In short, it does nothing to disprove of anything I said. Keep up, little aggie.
And if you were to subtract wins by or against FCS teams, the numbers would get much closer. Or you can do even better and only look at the records of defeated opponents in auto-bid conferences, since wins against teams like Rice, SMU, NMST, etc. are joke wins anyways. If you have to hang your hat on beating a 10 win Rice team, you've already lost the argument.
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
You posting the combined win/loss record of our defeated opponents out of context does nothing to disprove of what I said. It does nothing to address the fact that we have the same record. It does nothing to address that UT beat a ranked team and A&M has not. It does not take into account the quality of the schedule our opponents played. It does not take into account that A&M played an FCS team and Texas did not. In short, it does nothing to disprove of anything I said. Keep up, little aggie.
And if you were to subtract wins by or against FCS teams, the numbers would get much closer. Or you can do even better and only look at the records of defeated opponents in auto-bid conferences, since wins against teams like Rice, SMU, NMST, etc. are joke wins anyways. If you have to hang your hat on beating a 10 win Rice team, you've already lost the argument.
I didn't post anything out of context, those are the raw numbers.
Having 1 win against a low ranked opponent does not equate to losing by a score or less to 3 top 7 teams.
The strength of schedule takes into account the quality of our opponents.
Our win over the 10 win Rice team is not what I am hanging my hat on, however, they did defeat a Big XII team, so what does that say about your conference?
You posting the combined win/loss record of our defeated opponents out of context does nothing to disprove of what I said. It does nothing to address the fact that we have the same record. It does nothing to address that UT beat a ranked team and A&M has not. It does not take into account the quality of the schedule our opponents played. It does not take into account that A&M played an FCS team and Texas did not. In short, it does nothing to disprove of anything I said. Keep up, little aggie.
And if you were to subtract wins by or against FCS teams, the numbers would get much closer. Or you can do even better and only look at the records of defeated opponents in auto-bid conferences, since wins against teams like Rice, SMU, NMST, etc. are joke wins anyways. If you have to hang your hat on beating a 10 win Rice team, you've already lost the argument.
I didn't post anything out of context, those are the raw numbers.
Having 1 win against a low ranked opponent does not equate to losing by a score or less to 3 top 7 teams.
The strength of schedule takes into account the quality of our opponents.
Our win over the 10 win Rice team is not what I am hanging my hat on, however, they did defeat a Big XII team, so what does that say about your conference?
Originally posted by RayRay99
I didn't post anything out of context, those are the raw numbers.
Having 1 win against a low ranked opponent does not equate to losing by a score or less to 3 top 7 teams.
The strength of schedule takes into account the quality of our opponents.
Our win over the 10 win Rice team is not what I am hanging my hat on, however, they did defeat a Big XII team, so what does that say about your conference?
Posting the raw numbers without any reference to how they were achieved is by definition posting them out of context.
You are now arguing that beating one top 10 team is not as good as losing to three top 10 teams. Do you realize how stupid you sound? And FYI, you still can't show that you've beaten anybody good. You keep referring to you SoS like it supports your argument when you lost to all of the good teams on your schedule. You might want to look into getting a refund of your tuition; that A&M degree isn't helping you at all.
I didn't post anything out of context, those are the raw numbers.
Having 1 win against a low ranked opponent does not equate to losing by a score or less to 3 top 7 teams.
The strength of schedule takes into account the quality of our opponents.
Our win over the 10 win Rice team is not what I am hanging my hat on, however, they did defeat a Big XII team, so what does that say about your conference?
Posting the raw numbers without any reference to how they were achieved is by definition posting them out of context.
You are now arguing that beating one top 10 team is not as good as losing to three top 10 teams. Do you realize how stupid you sound? And FYI, you still can't show that you've beaten anybody good. You keep referring to you SoS like it supports your argument when you lost to all of the good teams on your schedule. You might want to look into getting a refund of your tuition; that A&M degree isn't helping you at all.
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Posting the raw numbers without any reference to how they were achieved is by definition posting them out of context.
You are now arguing that beating one top 10 team is not as good as losing to three top 10 teams. Do you realize how stupid you sound? And FYI, you still can't show that you've beaten anybody good. You keep referring to you SoS like it supports your argument when you lost to all of the good teams on your schedule. You might want to look into getting a refund of your tuition; that A&M degree isn't helping you at all.
Oklahoma is not a top 10 team. We lost close games against the top teams in the country, we were not elite this season. However, we were better than y'all. The only "quality" win you have is Oklahoma, whose only quality win was last week against Okie St.
Posting the raw numbers without any reference to how they were achieved is by definition posting them out of context.
You are now arguing that beating one top 10 team is not as good as losing to three top 10 teams. Do you realize how stupid you sound? And FYI, you still can't show that you've beaten anybody good. You keep referring to you SoS like it supports your argument when you lost to all of the good teams on your schedule. You might want to look into getting a refund of your tuition; that A&M degree isn't helping you at all.
Oklahoma is not a top 10 team. We lost close games against the top teams in the country, we were not elite this season. However, we were better than y'all. The only "quality" win you have is Oklahoma, whose only quality win was last week against Okie St.
Originally posted by RayRay99
Oklahoma is not a top 10 team. We lost close games against the top teams in the country, we were not elite this season. However, we were better than y'all. The only "quality" win you have is Oklahoma, whose only quality win was last week against Okie St.
tbh...Texas is not good. but i think agri & mech is full of suck and do not think that team could beat texas. Try to bracket Evans and spy Manziel. Johnny Drama is not the issue, it's the match up with Evans is why you guys win. Texas could easily run the ball on you. throw out Texas' first two games for sure. robinson first coached the defense against ole miss. it steadily improved over the season except for the match up problems v oklite.
tbh, if everyone on the texas side is health with robinson, i don't think you would stand a chance.
Oklahoma is not a top 10 team. We lost close games against the top teams in the country, we were not elite this season. However, we were better than y'all. The only "quality" win you have is Oklahoma, whose only quality win was last week against Okie St.
tbh...Texas is not good. but i think agri & mech is full of suck and do not think that team could beat texas. Try to bracket Evans and spy Manziel. Johnny Drama is not the issue, it's the match up with Evans is why you guys win. Texas could easily run the ball on you. throw out Texas' first two games for sure. robinson first coached the defense against ole miss. it steadily improved over the season except for the match up problems v oklite.
tbh, if everyone on the texas side is health with robinson, i don't think you would stand a chance.
Originally posted by Spread-em offense
I think that head to head UT would beat A&M this season.
js
We would have killed Tennessee.
I think that head to head UT would beat A&M this season.
js
We would have killed Tennessee.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
