Warrior General Games

Since we have to pick only one, then I'll go with Stevie Hare.

However, I have many others on my team (yes, homer alert) that I think fit the bill nicely as well such as Cannon Ball, Ipwn Rivers, Malcolm Phoenix to name a few...

You cant compare Phoenix to Bo Rob. Hare, Ball, and Rivers...Yes. Phoenix no

Depends on how you look at it. Bo has 167 catches and Malcolm has 89 catches. Obviously Bo is gonna have more yards with nearly twice as many receptions.

The question becomes why does Bo have twice as many catches as Malcolm? Is it because he's that much better or that Chattanooga is 9-7 so they had to throw more to play catch up on the scoreboard? They had to throw to Bo more out of necessity. We threw to Malcolm because he was a consistent performer. IMO it's debatable which stat or attribute is better. Six of one, 1/2 dozen of another...

I'll end it by saying that Bo Rob is a very solid WR as is Malcolm.

Stevie Hare

Here is mt nomination

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=67518

I nominated him on another thread but he isn't on the ballot for some reason.

Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay
Depends on how you look at it. Bo has 167 catches and Malcolm has 89 catches. Obviously Bo is gonna have more yards with nearly twice as many receptions.

The question becomes why does Bo have twice as many catches as Malcolm? Is it because he's that much better or that Chattanooga is 9-7 so they had to throw more to play catch up on the scoreboard? They had to throw to Bo more out of necessity. We threw to Malcolm because he was a consistent performer. IMO it's debatable which stat or attribute is better. Six of one, 1/2 dozen of another...

I'll end it by saying that Bo Rob is a very solid WR as is Malcolm.

Agreed that we'll never know what would have happened if Malcolm had the exact number of catches as Bo Rob, but MVP is about what a player did , not what he could have done if he had been given the ball more.

Originally posted by sabresandkane
Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay

Depends on how you look at it. Bo has 167 catches and Malcolm has 89 catches. Obviously Bo is gonna have more yards with nearly twice as many receptions.

The question becomes why does Bo have twice as many catches as Malcolm? Is it because he's that much better or that Chattanooga is 9-7 so they had to throw more to play catch up on the scoreboard? They had to throw to Bo more out of necessity. We threw to Malcolm because he was a consistent performer. IMO it's debatable which stat or attribute is better. Six of one, 1/2 dozen of another...

I'll end it by saying that Bo Rob is a very solid WR as is Malcolm.

Agreed that we'll never know what would have happened if Malcolm had the exact number of catches as Bo Rob, but MVP is about what a player did , not what he could have done if he had been given the ball more.


I do remember earlier in the season saying how some people were saying certain running backs shouldn't be MVPs because of the gutted teams and how teams would be up by so much they'd run the ball 90% of the time. I mean if thats how people felt on one side wouldn't the other side be true as well?

Originally posted by Demario
Originally posted by sabresandkane

Originally posted by SkersAllTheWay


Depends on how you look at it. Bo has 167 catches and Malcolm has 89 catches. Obviously Bo is gonna have more yards with nearly twice as many receptions.

The question becomes why does Bo have twice as many catches as Malcolm? Is it because he's that much better or that Chattanooga is 9-7 so they had to throw more to play catch up on the scoreboard? They had to throw to Bo more out of necessity. We threw to Malcolm because he was a consistent performer. IMO it's debatable which stat or attribute is better. Six of one, 1/2 dozen of another...

I'll end it by saying that Bo Rob is a very solid WR as is Malcolm.

Agreed that we'll never know what would have happened if Malcolm had the exact number of catches as Bo Rob, but MVP is about what a player did , not what he could have done if he had been given the ball more.


I do remember earlier in the season saying how some people were saying certain running backs shouldn't be MVPs because of the gutted teams and how teams would be up by so much they'd run the ball 90% of the time. I mean if thats how people felt on one side wouldn't the other side be true as well?



It's true. It comes down to how the gameplan worked against a cpu team. Theoretically it evens out. Unless the West Conf had more gutted teams.... which seems to be the case due to the numbers.

Stevie Hare

I am not sure Bo Rob (Who is awesome imo) has as many receivers on his own team competing for playtime and catches as Phoenix does either

Bo Rob. No diggety, no doubt.

Stevie Hare ftw!

Buster Pimps
( sorry i am biased had to pick our guy mobody else was;p)
We made it to the championship it was a team effort so far but he is the season MVP of out team for sure.

I am going to take a different approach to this then most. Of course I would pick Buster Pimps, he was about 50% of our whole offense this season and everyone knew it. He is our MVP hands down. Not picking a guy from my own team, is easy too, Matthew Shanahan. This guy did more for one team then any player in the league. His stats are crazy but he is all they had for the most part and everyone knew that. This guy single handedly cared his team into the playoffs and to the second round. He had some crazy numbers but who didn’t against gutted teams. He was the leader in rushing and TDs. Hell I would put him at QB if he could throw to himself every other play.

Matthew Shanahan

Bo Rob

Teams knew it was coming and still couldn't stop it.