By the way, Tom, am I going to handle this again this season? I still haven't updated the BBB16 webpage on my site, but I plan on getting to it shortly. With the summer being up, I scale back my drinking, greatly increasing my weekend productivity.
tomcollins
offline
offline
Originally posted by trendon
By the way, Tom, am I going to handle this again this season? I still haven't updated the BBB16 webpage on my site, but I plan on getting to it shortly. With the summer being up, I scale back my drinking, greatly increasing my weekend productivity.
If you can, it would be great. I'd prefer to split it by conferences - too hard to compare players you never saw on the field and face different opponents.
By the way, Tom, am I going to handle this again this season? I still haven't updated the BBB16 webpage on my site, but I plan on getting to it shortly. With the summer being up, I scale back my drinking, greatly increasing my weekend productivity.
If you can, it would be great. I'd prefer to split it by conferences - too hard to compare players you never saw on the field and face different opponents.
trendon
offline
offline
Originally posted by tomcollins
Originally posted by trendon
By the way, Tom, am I going to handle this again this season? I still haven't updated the BBB16 webpage on my site, but I plan on getting to it shortly. With the summer being up, I scale back my drinking, greatly increasing my weekend productivity.
If you can, it would be great. I'd prefer to split it by conferences - too hard to compare players you never saw on the field and face different opponents.
Well, I am against that for a couple of reasons.
1) An All-BBB16 Team is much more prestigious.
2) It is way too much fucking work that way.
Originally posted by trendon
By the way, Tom, am I going to handle this again this season? I still haven't updated the BBB16 webpage on my site, but I plan on getting to it shortly. With the summer being up, I scale back my drinking, greatly increasing my weekend productivity.
If you can, it would be great. I'd prefer to split it by conferences - too hard to compare players you never saw on the field and face different opponents.
Well, I am against that for a couple of reasons.
1) An All-BBB16 Team is much more prestigious.
2) It is way too much fucking work that way.
tomcollins
offline
offline
Originally posted by trendon
Originally posted by tomcollins
Originally posted by trendon
By the way, Tom, am I going to handle this again this season? I still haven't updated the BBB16 webpage on my site, but I plan on getting to it shortly. With the summer being up, I scale back my drinking, greatly increasing my weekend productivity.
If you can, it would be great. I'd prefer to split it by conferences - too hard to compare players you never saw on the field and face different opponents.
Well, I am against that for a couple of reasons.
1) An All-BBB16 Team is much more prestigious.
2) It is way too much fucking work that way.
I didn't vote last time because it was way too much work to look up all these players you never saw play, and have no idea who they are, and you just end up with stats against crap teams. This year will be even harder.
Originally posted by tomcollins
Originally posted by trendon
By the way, Tom, am I going to handle this again this season? I still haven't updated the BBB16 webpage on my site, but I plan on getting to it shortly. With the summer being up, I scale back my drinking, greatly increasing my weekend productivity.
If you can, it would be great. I'd prefer to split it by conferences - too hard to compare players you never saw on the field and face different opponents.
Well, I am against that for a couple of reasons.
1) An All-BBB16 Team is much more prestigious.
2) It is way too much fucking work that way.
I didn't vote last time because it was way too much work to look up all these players you never saw play, and have no idea who they are, and you just end up with stats against crap teams. This year will be even harder.
Yeremiah
offline
offline
I think someone from the East should do an all east team and someone from a west can do an all west team. Stats don't really compare from 1 conference to the other anyway.
tomcollins
offline
offline
We have a lot of players that I think should get nominated that weren't on my original watch list:
Andy Groom (P)
Myron Sardukis (DE)
Bush Rollins (DT)
Brett Lindberg (QB)
Joe Francis (CB)
Teh Fridge (OT)
Moose Johnston (FB)
The Animal Laurinaitis (LB)
Johnny Atlas (WR)
Andy Groom (P)
Myron Sardukis (DE)
Bush Rollins (DT)
Brett Lindberg (QB)
Joe Francis (CB)
Teh Fridge (OT)
Moose Johnston (FB)
The Animal Laurinaitis (LB)
Johnny Atlas (WR)
Yeremiah
offline
offline
Originally posted by tomcollins
I think Joey Cox should be nominated.
I completely agree.
I think Joey Cox should be nominated.
I completely agree.
SAVAGE OPS
offline
offline
EZ just has too much depth to single out a few. We're 2 deep at every position so nobody's stat really jump out at you.
Well, other than Dannyboy at WR. I'd say he'd be on the Offensive MVP ballot.
Well, other than Dannyboy at WR. I'd say he'd be on the Offensive MVP ballot.
Last edited Sep 8, 2008 15:10:19
trendon
offline
offline
Originally posted by SAVAGE OPS
EZ just has too much depth to single out a few. We're 2 deep at every position so nobody's stat really jump out at you.
Well, other than Dannyboy at WR. I'd say he'd be on the Offensive MVP ballot.
It was fucking impossible to pick the skill positions. People are going to be screaming. I left a write-in category.
EZ just has too much depth to single out a few. We're 2 deep at every position so nobody's stat really jump out at you.
Well, other than Dannyboy at WR. I'd say he'd be on the Offensive MVP ballot.
It was fucking impossible to pick the skill positions. People are going to be screaming. I left a write-in category.
logicbomb
offline
offline
Originally posted by trendon
Originally posted by SAVAGE OPS
EZ just has too much depth to single out a few. We're 2 deep at every position so nobody's stat really jump out at you.
Well, other than Dannyboy at WR. I'd say he'd be on the Offensive MVP ballot.
It was fucking impossible to pick the skill positions. People are going to be screaming. I left a write-in category.
The Write in thing did not seem to work. It still had me pick one of the choices. No matter though, nice work.
Originally posted by SAVAGE OPS
EZ just has too much depth to single out a few. We're 2 deep at every position so nobody's stat really jump out at you.
Well, other than Dannyboy at WR. I'd say he'd be on the Offensive MVP ballot.
It was fucking impossible to pick the skill positions. People are going to be screaming. I left a write-in category.
The Write in thing did not seem to work. It still had me pick one of the choices. No matter though, nice work.
trendon
offline
offline
Originally posted by logicbomb
Originally posted by trendon
Originally posted by SAVAGE OPS
EZ just has too much depth to single out a few. We're 2 deep at every position so nobody's stat really jump out at you.
Well, other than Dannyboy at WR. I'd say he'd be on the Offensive MVP ballot.
It was fucking impossible to pick the skill positions. People are going to be screaming. I left a write-in category.
The Write in thing did not seem to work. It still had me pick one of the choices. No matter though, nice work.
I did that on purpose. You'd have two selections if you chose to write-in
Originally posted by trendon
Originally posted by SAVAGE OPS
EZ just has too much depth to single out a few. We're 2 deep at every position so nobody's stat really jump out at you.
Well, other than Dannyboy at WR. I'd say he'd be on the Offensive MVP ballot.
It was fucking impossible to pick the skill positions. People are going to be screaming. I left a write-in category.
The Write in thing did not seem to work. It still had me pick one of the choices. No matter though, nice work.
I did that on purpose. You'd have two selections if you chose to write-in
Last edited Sep 8, 2008 16:22:45
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
