how about the Irrelevants...we have certainly turned it around this year!!
greatfish
offline
offline
Originally posted by Stephenthegreat
Besides a luck win vs the clamjousters who have you beaten?
If you are going to make that argument against everyone who "claims" to be the top ranked in the league, please enlighten us with your power rankings.
Don't forget to include the strength of schedule adjustments.
If you can't provide anything of substance, why hate on undefeated teams.
Besides a luck win vs the clamjousters who have you beaten?
If you are going to make that argument against everyone who "claims" to be the top ranked in the league, please enlighten us with your power rankings.
Don't forget to include the strength of schedule adjustments.
If you can't provide anything of substance, why hate on undefeated teams.
bacardi
offline
offline
Originally posted by greatfish
Originally posted by Stephenthegreat
Besides a luck win vs the clamjousters who have you beaten?
If you are going to make that argument against everyone who "claims" to be the top ranked in the league, please enlighten us with your power rankings.
Don't forget to include the strength of schedule adjustments.
If you can't provide anything of substance, why hate on undefeated teams.
what substance do you need to be enlightened? like he already said, removing the clamjousters win (which required a LOT of bounces to go the irrelevents way), they havent done anything worthy. the teams theyve beaten have a combined record of 10-32, and only 1 team has a winning record. whoopdeedoo
Originally posted by Freakshow
2-0
Warriors over Playbook. Stats don't lie.
its hysterical and you arent the first to do this, so i cant say youre the only idiot. i absolutely crack up everytime someone quotes stats based on scrimmage games.
Originally posted by Stephenthegreat
Besides a luck win vs the clamjousters who have you beaten?
If you are going to make that argument against everyone who "claims" to be the top ranked in the league, please enlighten us with your power rankings.
Don't forget to include the strength of schedule adjustments.
If you can't provide anything of substance, why hate on undefeated teams.
what substance do you need to be enlightened? like he already said, removing the clamjousters win (which required a LOT of bounces to go the irrelevents way), they havent done anything worthy. the teams theyve beaten have a combined record of 10-32, and only 1 team has a winning record. whoopdeedoo
Originally posted by Freakshow
2-0
Warriors over Playbook. Stats don't lie.
its hysterical and you arent the first to do this, so i cant say youre the only idiot. i absolutely crack up everytime someone quotes stats based on scrimmage games.
Last edited Aug 15, 2008 00:47:32
abdvash
offline
offline
Originally posted by bacardi
Originally posted by greatfish
Originally posted by Stephenthegreat
Besides a luck win vs the clamjousters who have you beaten?
If you are going to make that argument against everyone who "claims" to be the top ranked in the league, please enlighten us with your power rankings.
Don't forget to include the strength of schedule adjustments.
If you can't provide anything of substance, why hate on undefeated teams.
what substance do you need to be enlightened? like he already said, removing the clamjousters win (which required a LOT of bounces to go the irrelevents way), they havent done anything worthy. the teams theyve beaten have a combined record of 10-32, and only 1 team has a winning record. whoopdeedoo
Originally posted by Freakshow
2-0
Warriors over Playbook. Stats don't lie.
its hysterical and you arent the first to do this, so i cant say youre the only idiot. i absolutely crack up everytime someone quotes stats based on scrimmage games.
The only reason we say this is because if you guys beat us, this board would have blown up with how we suck because we lost. Even though it is a scrimmage game. But we didn't lose, so you won't get that satisfaction. And with Fish's comment, if you can't come up with a better formula then shush until you can. It's the formula BCS goes for and they use it. I'm not saying it's perfect but it's definately better than any other suggestions you have put forth.
P.S.
Please lie to me and tell me that the Ho Playbook would have not said crap if they won the scrimmage. Come on now, be serious.
We're not idiots, we are just beating you to the punch (and your team for that matter)
Originally posted by greatfish
Originally posted by Stephenthegreat
Besides a luck win vs the clamjousters who have you beaten?
If you are going to make that argument against everyone who "claims" to be the top ranked in the league, please enlighten us with your power rankings.
Don't forget to include the strength of schedule adjustments.
If you can't provide anything of substance, why hate on undefeated teams.
what substance do you need to be enlightened? like he already said, removing the clamjousters win (which required a LOT of bounces to go the irrelevents way), they havent done anything worthy. the teams theyve beaten have a combined record of 10-32, and only 1 team has a winning record. whoopdeedoo
Originally posted by Freakshow
2-0
Warriors over Playbook. Stats don't lie.
its hysterical and you arent the first to do this, so i cant say youre the only idiot. i absolutely crack up everytime someone quotes stats based on scrimmage games.
The only reason we say this is because if you guys beat us, this board would have blown up with how we suck because we lost. Even though it is a scrimmage game. But we didn't lose, so you won't get that satisfaction. And with Fish's comment, if you can't come up with a better formula then shush until you can. It's the formula BCS goes for and they use it. I'm not saying it's perfect but it's definately better than any other suggestions you have put forth.
P.S.
Please lie to me and tell me that the Ho Playbook would have not said crap if they won the scrimmage. Come on now, be serious.
We're not idiots, we are just beating you to the punch (and your team for that matter)Last edited Aug 15, 2008 01:23:14
confidential
offline
offline
if we beat you in a scrimmage i would not have said a word because it's a meaningless scrimmage.
greatfish
offline
offline
Originally posted by bacardi
what substance do you need to be enlightened? like he already said, removing the clamjousters win (which required a LOT of bounces to go the irrelevents way), they havent done anything worthy. the teams theyve beaten have a combined record of 10-32, and only 1 team has a winning record. whoopdeedoo
If his post would have including a combined record or something more then just, "a luck win". Along with another pick as to who is better.
Your post reads as researched and fact. His post reads as personal opinion with no substance. Huge difference in posting styles.
... And I really would like to know who he feels is the current best team in the league (and bacardi, feel free to post your selection too), since he disagrees with everyone's mentioned selections.
what substance do you need to be enlightened? like he already said, removing the clamjousters win (which required a LOT of bounces to go the irrelevents way), they havent done anything worthy. the teams theyve beaten have a combined record of 10-32, and only 1 team has a winning record. whoopdeedoo
If his post would have including a combined record or something more then just, "a luck win". Along with another pick as to who is better.
Your post reads as researched and fact. His post reads as personal opinion with no substance. Huge difference in posting styles.
... And I really would like to know who he feels is the current best team in the league (and bacardi, feel free to post your selection too), since he disagrees with everyone's mentioned selections.
Darkstrand
offline
offline
clamjousters just boosted so they are probably the best team in the league.
we'll probably know one way or the other who the best team in the league is in 2 games.
radio city did decently in the game vs clamjousters. They out gained them and didn't get to fluky with the turnover differential.
I"d say HO playbook vs doom was the second biggest fluke of the season. I think I saw a game in the other conference in which a team outgained by 200 yards and lost
we'll probably know one way or the other who the best team in the league is in 2 games.
radio city did decently in the game vs clamjousters. They out gained them and didn't get to fluky with the turnover differential.
I"d say HO playbook vs doom was the second biggest fluke of the season. I think I saw a game in the other conference in which a team outgained by 200 yards and lost
Last edited Aug 15, 2008 04:11:52
Stephenthegreat
offline
offline
Originally posted by greatfish
Originally posted by bacardi
what substance do you need to be enlightened? like he already said, removing the clamjousters win (which required a LOT of bounces to go the irrelevents way), they havent done anything worthy. the teams theyve beaten have a combined record of 10-32, and only 1 team has a winning record. whoopdeedoo
If his post would have including a combined record or something more then just, "a luck win". Along with another pick as to who is better.
Your post reads as researched and fact. His post reads as personal opinion with no substance. Huge difference in posting styles.
... And I really would like to know who he feels is the current best team in the league (and bacardi, feel free to post your selection too), since he disagrees with everyone's mentioned selections.
That is all implied... Bacardi got it. Why didn't you?
Originally posted by bacardi
what substance do you need to be enlightened? like he already said, removing the clamjousters win (which required a LOT of bounces to go the irrelevents way), they havent done anything worthy. the teams theyve beaten have a combined record of 10-32, and only 1 team has a winning record. whoopdeedoo
If his post would have including a combined record or something more then just, "a luck win". Along with another pick as to who is better.
Your post reads as researched and fact. His post reads as personal opinion with no substance. Huge difference in posting styles.
... And I really would like to know who he feels is the current best team in the league (and bacardi, feel free to post your selection too), since he disagrees with everyone's mentioned selections.
That is all implied... Bacardi got it. Why didn't you?
greatfish
offline
offline
Originally posted by Stephenthegreat
That is all implied... Bacardi got it. Why didn't you?
I'm not in the East, so I don't follow the East. I see a team that is undefeated, getting put down without any data to back it up or another suggestion of a team that is better.
That is all implied... Bacardi got it. Why didn't you?
I'm not in the East, so I don't follow the East. I see a team that is undefeated, getting put down without any data to back it up or another suggestion of a team that is better.
Stephenthegreat
offline
offline
So if you have NO IDEA what you are talking about maybe you should do some fact checking before shooting your mouth off like a douche?
Last edited Aug 15, 2008 09:45:40
greatfish
offline
offline
Originally posted by Stephenthegreat
So if you have NO IDEA what you are talking about maybe you should do some fact checking before shooting your mouth off like a douche?
7 - 0 is all I need to know. You already said that the other undefeated teams aren't the current best in the league, yet you failed to provide another team which is better than one of the undefeated teams.
2 1/2 seasons of you "shooting your mouth off" has gotten old. I'm a prick, not a douche... get your facts right, twat.
So if you have NO IDEA what you are talking about maybe you should do some fact checking before shooting your mouth off like a douche?
7 - 0 is all I need to know. You already said that the other undefeated teams aren't the current best in the league, yet you failed to provide another team which is better than one of the undefeated teams.
2 1/2 seasons of you "shooting your mouth off" has gotten old. I'm a prick, not a douche... get your facts right, twat.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
