You forgot Cyrus Neckbeard from the Aggies
CapnCrunch
offline
offline
yea Smith definitely needs mention. He is really a true MVP because without him, that team goes nowhere.
coreyls18
offline
offline
Originally posted by CapnCrunch
yea Smith definitely needs mention. He is really a true MVP because without him, that team goes nowhere.
Yeah..Blake is pretty good
yea Smith definitely needs mention. He is really a true MVP because without him, that team goes nowhere.
Yeah..Blake is pretty good
T-Noles813
offline
offline
BUNDY! 2 sacks, 1 forced fumble that wound up being a turn over! he did miss 3 tackles though...
T-Noles813
offline
offline
Ok, i am going to edit out all the OT's i dont play against.
On the bright side, BOTH of the starting OT's gave up a sack to Bundy.
On the bright side, BOTH of the starting OT's gave up a sack to Bundy.
CapnCrunch
offline
offline
Whew. didn't know if I was going to be able to sleep tonight. dont scare us like that!
dadeboy
offline
offline
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
Shenanigans.... Hes not even the best on the team
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
Shenanigans.... Hes not even the best on the team
Kramer
offline
offline
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
When he gets within 10 sacks of JJ of the AWC, let us know.
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
When he gets within 10 sacks of JJ of the AWC, let us know.
Joebarber
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kramer
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
When he gets within 10 sacks of JJ of the AWC, let us know.
Wrong conference...the 8 sacks against woodridge was impressive.
The 9 against a god awful team was not.
Great player though...gonna say 9 or 10 in first step
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
When he gets within 10 sacks of JJ of the AWC, let us know.
Wrong conference...the 8 sacks against woodridge was impressive.
The 9 against a god awful team was not.
Great player though...gonna say 9 or 10 in first step
Last edited Aug 13, 2008 11:10:39
DiegoKokomo
offline
offline
Originally posted by Joebarber
Originally posted by Kramer
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
When he gets within 10 sacks of JJ of the AWC, let us know.
Wrong conference...the 8 sacks against woodridge was impressive.
The 9 against a god awful team was not.
Great player though...gonna say 9 or 10 in first step
WEPL = Western Europe Pro League, which has nothing to do with conference obviously. Had kalkmanc said best in Zeta then you'd have a point...
Oh, and if you ignore the 9 unimpressive sacks against a "god awful team" then he is still double digits ahead of Bundy.
Originally posted by Kramer
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
When he gets within 10 sacks of JJ of the AWC, let us know.
Wrong conference...the 8 sacks against woodridge was impressive.
The 9 against a god awful team was not.
Great player though...gonna say 9 or 10 in first step
WEPL = Western Europe Pro League, which has nothing to do with conference obviously. Had kalkmanc said best in Zeta then you'd have a point...
Oh, and if you ignore the 9 unimpressive sacks against a "god awful team" then he is still double digits ahead of Bundy.
Last edited Aug 13, 2008 11:31:23
Joebarber
offline
offline
Originally posted by DiegoKokomo
Originally posted by Joebarber
Originally posted by Kramer
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
When he gets within 10 sacks of JJ of the AWC, let us know.
Wrong conference...the 8 sacks against woodridge was impressive.
The 9 against a god awful team was not.
Great player though...gonna say 9 or 10 in first step
WEPL = Western Europe Pro League, which has nothing to do with conference obviously. Had kalkmanc said best in Zeta then you'd have a point...
At the time he made the statement, he did have a point. JJ had a huge game today that grabbed everybodys attention
Originally posted by Joebarber
Originally posted by Kramer
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
When he gets within 10 sacks of JJ of the AWC, let us know.
Wrong conference...the 8 sacks against woodridge was impressive.
The 9 against a god awful team was not.
Great player though...gonna say 9 or 10 in first step
WEPL = Western Europe Pro League, which has nothing to do with conference obviously. Had kalkmanc said best in Zeta then you'd have a point...
At the time he made the statement, he did have a point. JJ had a huge game today that grabbed everybodys attention
DiegoKokomo
offline
offline
Originally posted by Joebarber
Originally posted by DiegoKokomo
Originally posted by Joebarber
Originally posted by Kramer
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
When he gets within 10 sacks of JJ of the AWC, let us know.
Wrong conference...the 8 sacks against woodridge was impressive.
The 9 against a god awful team was not.
Great player though...gonna say 9 or 10 in first step
WEPL = Western Europe Pro League, which has nothing to do with conference obviously. Had kalkmanc said best in Zeta then you'd have a point...
At the time he made the statement, he did have a point. JJ had a huge game today that grabbed everybodys attention
Very true.
Originally posted by DiegoKokomo
Originally posted by Joebarber
Originally posted by Kramer
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
When he gets within 10 sacks of JJ of the AWC, let us know.
Wrong conference...the 8 sacks against woodridge was impressive.
The 9 against a god awful team was not.
Great player though...gonna say 9 or 10 in first step
WEPL = Western Europe Pro League, which has nothing to do with conference obviously. Had kalkmanc said best in Zeta then you'd have a point...
At the time he made the statement, he did have a point. JJ had a huge game today that grabbed everybodys attention
Very true.
T-Noles813
offline
offline
Originally posted by DiegoKokomo
Originally posted by Joebarber
Originally posted by Kramer
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
When he gets within 10 sacks of JJ of the AWC, let us know.
Wrong conference...the 8 sacks against woodridge was impressive.
The 9 against a god awful team was not.
Great player though...gonna say 9 or 10 in first step
WEPL = Western Europe Pro League, which has nothing to do with conference obviously. Had kalkmanc said best in Zeta then you'd have a point...
Oh, and if you ignore the 9 unimpressive sacks against a "god awful team" then he is still double digits ahead of Bundy.
Even so, just because one player happens to have better numbers at the moment doesnt mean a person cant think someone else is better. If Tiger Woods loses a tourny, is the guy who won it a better golfer than Tiger?
Originally posted by Joebarber
Originally posted by Kramer
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Bundy tore it up again today, best DE in WEPL IMO.
When he gets within 10 sacks of JJ of the AWC, let us know.
Wrong conference...the 8 sacks against woodridge was impressive.
The 9 against a god awful team was not.
Great player though...gonna say 9 or 10 in first step
WEPL = Western Europe Pro League, which has nothing to do with conference obviously. Had kalkmanc said best in Zeta then you'd have a point...
Oh, and if you ignore the 9 unimpressive sacks against a "god awful team" then he is still double digits ahead of Bundy.
Even so, just because one player happens to have better numbers at the moment doesnt mean a person cant think someone else is better. If Tiger Woods loses a tourny, is the guy who won it a better golfer than Tiger?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
