User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > European Pro League > Eastern Europe Conference > Zeta All Conference Team - Offense
Page:
 
TundaKlap
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Randy03Texags
Taking 200 more snaps is a negative in my eyes, it means that you should have about 2000 more yards (10YPC) and not 1000 and also way more TDs.

I did everything based on performance per snaps .. if you look at his QB Rating it is higher, that is because it uses the same metric as me. I DID give the nod to people who had higher bulk stats (like your passing) when the per snap performance was similar. But per snap Fry was the best QB who had such high performance and I value efficiency.

That doesnt mean that you didnt rock the league, that is false, you kicked ass, its just that if I had to choose a QB for one pass, it would be Fry and not Enright.


Stop posting here and get the defensive group out!
 
Randy03Texags
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TundaKlap
Stop posting here and get the defensive group out!


Well I believe yall both questioned why Lance isnt #1, so I answered.

And I have had to do real work at work today, its kinda wild. Also Im working on my team and keeping morale up .. losing is never fun, yall should experience it
 
domenick2x
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Randy03Texags
Taking 200 more snaps is a negative in my eyes, it means that you should have about 2000 more yards (10YPC) and not 1000 and also way more TDs.

I did everything based on performance per snaps .. if you look at his QB Rating it is higher, that is because it uses the same metric as me. I DID give the nod to people who had higher bulk stats (like your passing) when the per snap performance was similar. But per snap Fry was the best QB who had such high performance and I value efficiency.

That doesnt mean that you didnt rock the league, that is false, you kicked ass, its just that if I had to choose a QB for one pass, it would be Fry and not Enright.

To further show the point, look at the HBs, Martinez was clearly the best in every way, there is no doubt there. But for 2 and 3 it came down to Cabrera having more bulk stats and then Lloyd had a better yards per carry, but even that didnt make up for the fact that Cabrera had more yards and more TDs .. at least in my mind.

Again its all subjective, but I am willing to explain my methodology to anyone who is curious.



In those 200 more snaps, you expect him to complete them all?

Higher QB Rating = Better QB, generally speaking.
 
Randy03Texags
offline
Link
 
Right Fry had a 98 QB rating, Enright 86, pretty clear cut to me. And yeah I should have tempered the thing, but the point is .. in 200 more snaps he had 1 more TD and 900 more yards .. even at 60% (good completion percentage) and 10YPC, 1200 yards would have been expected from an elite QB, he got 900, very good, but not enough to make up for 12 points of QB rating (which means efficiency).
 
TundaKlap
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Randy03Texags
Originally posted by TundaKlap

Stop posting here and get the defensive group out!


Well I believe yall both questioned why Lance isnt #1, so I answered.

And I have had to do real work at work today, its kinda wild. Also Im working on my team and keeping morale up .. losing is never fun, yall should experience it


I didn't question it. I just said it was arguable.
 
madnova
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Randy03Texags

and then Lloyd had a better yards per carry, but even that didnt make up for the fact that Cabrera had more yards and more TDs .. at least in my mind.
.


That may have had something to do with splitting starts and being vultured.


http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=69875

 
Randy03Texags
offline
Link
 
If your team makes your tactics such that you split starts, its really not my problem, yall probably have a better chance as a TEAM but awards are for INDIVIDUALS

Since my last post I got the LBs done, initially I was going to include 8 LBs, but quality forced me to include 9.
 
madnova
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Randy03Texags
If your team makes your tactics such that you split starts, its really not my problem, yall probably have a better chance as a TEAM but awards are for INDIVIDUALS

Since my last post I got the LBs done, initially I was going to include 8 LBs, but quality forced me to include 9.


I never said it was a problem.

Not everyone here is looking to attack you.

Most, yes, but not all.
 
Onyxgem
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Randy03Texags
If your team makes your tactics such that you split starts, its really not my problem, yall probably have a better chance as a TEAM but awards are for INDIVIDUALS



Team awards are always more important than individual awards...but I do appreicate my RB and WR getting mentioned...
 
Damazin1
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Randy03Texags


Frye was clearly the best QB, his TD/Int ratio is through the roof, high completion percentage, good yardage, the whole package. Enright had completion percentage a bit lower than most of the top tier and Debbie lacked yardage and TDs, but was better than Chipmunk due to far fewer ints throw.


Chipmunk belongs in there! He threw for 1000 more yards than Debbie. I know Debbie threw 10 fewer pick... but 1000 yards and 4 more TD's has to count for something.... oh and 120 more completions.
 
madnova
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Damazin1
Originally posted by Randy03Texags



Frye was clearly the best QB, his TD/Int ratio is through the roof, high completion percentage, good yardage, the whole package. Enright had completion percentage a bit lower than most of the top tier and Debbie lacked yardage and TDs, but was better than Chipmunk due to far fewer ints throw.


Chipmunk belongs in there! He threw for 1000 more yards than Debbie. I know Debbie threw 10 fewer pick... but 1000 yards and 4 more TD's has to count for something.... oh and 120 more completions.

There is no way Fructose would allow him to put Chipmunk over Little Debbie....not for all the Star Crunchs in the world.

 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.