Warrior General Games

Originally posted by flames54

Either way, point out what was not accurate about my comments?

Oh for crying out loud. Ok Flames, I will humor you ONE TIME ONLY in this thread. ugghhhh

Here's your comment:
Self made ringers, what in the fuck is that?

Sorry TSE, but you've lost all right to call people out after you refused to bet me not once, but twice. Shows you have no faith or balls in your own team yet you come in here to pick on Tim Harper who kicked your ass?

I can't imagine a better way for that game to have ended than my two arch rivals in a tie ball game, but Tim beat you so kindly shut up and take it to the playoffs where it really matters.

Don't call people out when you get called out and back down twice yourself, big fella.

MY COMMENTS:

1) I know of 1 bet I refused but not 2? Either way I bet you a million dollars you cant think of the number I'm thinking of between 1 and 100, HINT: It's also a decimal.

Just because somebody makes a bogus BS bet that isn't statistically fair or honorable doesn't mean they lose face for laughing at your asinine proposed bet.

So there's TWO things there, the number of bets, and the fact that I lose a right because of not calling a bogus bet.

2) I have balls. There is no freaking way anybody beats me on balls, I'm just overloaded, you can only match me on having bigger balls, my whole life I've demonstrated GIGANTIC BALLS, just because you weren't there the last 29 years doesn't make you an authority on the subject.

3) Confidence in my team. There can't be anybody in the game that has more confidence in their team that is also logically sound confidence and not emotionally biased without proper cause.

The key reason is we have a team that plays to its full potential, we have a loaded team that doesnt have any of these "ringers" that Tim does, and we have consistently beaten many teams that outleveled us because we have such strong chemistry in our players in conjunction with the super strategies that I have behind the scenes, so with the quality of what we have and the brains of the operation, it would be hard for another owner to have a strong enough basis to give them the same type of confidence that I have in these guys.

So that's 4 total things if we count the 2 in number 1.

So again, LAST TIME i will humor you, but I wasted a lot of time breaking down how your post was nothing but jibberish crap and doesnt even address the topic here.

I also find it interesting that you are like never in the Pro League thread, but well because I'm the author of this thread and it as caught some steam, you can't resist but to jump in just to attack me, not actually discuss the issues, because all you can see is me as a target. I must be some BIG FISH that you just dream about being able to hunt down one day, cause that's how you have acted in MANY other threads I have been in. It must be KILLING you to not have forum search to quickly find other discussions I've been in so you can swoop in and try to throw your jibberish at me to cloud the topic.

So, no more replies to you unless you make logical and substantive posts that qualify for a reply, that is the rule, otherwise you will be ignored here.

I remember I tried to recruit Tim Harper to the Switchbacks, but you chose otherwise.

Originally posted by brigmar


Bullshit.
HoggLife half-boosted to beat you (and beat you soundly), yet there's no props for that underdog win.

Doesn't sound like props to me.
The guy said he was going to beat you all season.
Everybody laughed.
He manned up, took the future XP hit, and owned the Lions.


Uhh, if HoggLife beats us in the playoffs that's w/o a boosting advantage, his win in the regular season was a hollow win, but he has the OPPORTUNITY to win a meaningful game in the playoffs, hopefully he doesnt, otherwise yeah of course he would get props.

I havent checked his roster, but I dont' believe he has any ringers on his team. The couple guys he has aren't as good as other guys that pop up on the FA market, so none of them breach the art of competitor-ship that I have referred to here.

So yeah if HoggLife beats us in the playoffs, then he's got my respect. I don't think he is likely to beat us though, I think we have a stronger team.

Originally posted by Ronin
I remember I tried to recruit Tim Harper to the Switchbacks, but you chose otherwise.

You suck as an owner

I still think it is funny as hell how I out Strategized The Strategy Expert by beating him with some of my players boosting and therefore dropping him in the standings and also with the Nasty winning tomorrow he will fall to 6th in the standings and with how smart that ignorant bastard tries to make himself out to be he just says standing dont matter. I will be laughing my ass off if he has to play the Mustangs in the first round cause I had some of my players boost. Ya now who knows their STRATEGY!!!!!!!

Originally posted by Ronin
I remember I tried to recruit Tim Harper to the Switchbacks, but you chose otherwise.

He chose wisely

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by brigmar



Bullshit.
HoggLife half-boosted to beat you (and beat you soundly), yet there's no props for that underdog win.

Doesn't sound like props to me.
The guy said he was going to beat you all season.
Everybody laughed.
He manned up, took the future XP hit, and owned the Lions.


Uhh, if HoggLife beats us in the playoffs that's w/o a boosting advantage, his win in the regular season was a hollow win, but he has the OPPORTUNITY to win a meaningful game in the playoffs, hopefully he doesnt, otherwise yeah of course he would get props.

I havent checked his roster, but I dont' believe he has any ringers on his team. The couple guys he has aren't as good as other guys that pop up on the FA market, so none of them breach the art of competitor-ship that I have referred to here.

So yeah if HoggLife beats us in the playoffs, then he's got my respect. I don't think he is likely to beat us though, I think we have a stronger team.


Ummm With my Canada Pro and Usa Pro Championship trophies I can tell you I can gove a shit if I got your respect cause you dont own any meaningful trophies! Say what you will but either way I have more creditability than you my friend! Now go wipe those tears away cause I screwed up your whole season you coward ass piece of shit!

Originally posted by HoggLife
I still think it is funny as hell how I out Strategized The Strategy Expert by beating him with some of my players boosting and therefore dropping him in the standings and also with the Nasty winning tomorrow he will fall to 6th in the standings and with how smart that ignorant bastard tries to make himself out to be he just says standing dont matter. I will be laughing my ass off if he has to play the Mustangs in the first round cause I had some of my players boost. Ya now who knows their STRATEGY!!!!!!!

So much wrong with this post. Let's Fast Forward to the part where you declare yourself the winner so we can all get some sleep, this paragraph is too much work to pick apart lol.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by brigmar



Bullshit.
HoggLife half-boosted to beat you (and beat you soundly), yet there's no props for that underdog win.

Doesn't sound like props to me.
The guy said he was going to beat you all season.
Everybody laughed.
He manned up, took the future XP hit, and owned the Lions.


Uhh, if HoggLife beats us in the playoffs that's w/o a boosting advantage, his win in the regular season was a hollow win, but he has the OPPORTUNITY to win a meaningful game in the playoffs, hopefully he doesnt, otherwise yeah of course he would get props.

I havent checked his roster, but I dont' believe he has any ringers on his team. The couple guys he has aren't as good as other guys that pop up on the FA market, so none of them breach the art of competitor-ship that I have referred to here.

So yeah if HoggLife beats us in the playoffs, then he's got my respect. I don't think he is likely to beat us though, I think we have a stronger team.


Something's up with your logic circuits:

You think you have a stronger team.
Therefore it was valid for Hogg to boost to get the W, and the 'props'.
Yet when he does, the boost excuse comes out, and he was a chicken to boost, that he didn't "man up" and play you straight.
Yet you have the stronger team, right ?
Right?

One of you two put the money where their mouth is; The other, the foot.

TSE (aka God), you keep us all entertained tonight. Well done. Thanks for this lighthearted thread.

Originally posted by brigmar

Something's up with your logic circuits:

You think you have a stronger team.
Therefore it was valid for Hogg to boost to get the W, and the 'props'.
Yet when he does, the boost excuse comes out, and he was a chicken to boost, that he didn't "man up" and play you straight.
Yet you have the stronger team, right ?
Right?

One of you two put the money where their mouth is; The other, the foot.


Nope, nothing wrong here.

The props are when I think my team is stronger but he thinks his is stronger and we are playing on the same playing field, we both dont use boosts, or both have used boots. That hasn't happened yet.

NOTE: thinking my team is stronger is based upon subjective criteria as well as boosting, if you want to debate what ingredients make a stronger team then you need to delineate that before bringing the concept of thinking a team is stronger invalidates my logic on the concept we are discussing. You can't just bundle all of this stuff in and make it black and white, you are trying to combine too much without establishing the framework for what your terms represent and what the values of your contentions are.

Originally posted by tiger5
TSE (aka God), you keep us all entertained tonight. Well done. Thanks for this lighthearted thread.

That's what Bort gives me free Flex Points to do.... To create these side stories, I'm not really even playing the game, I'm just a diversion, a side story, and also I'm a psychologist that is running an experiment related to another objective. I don't actually even know what football is, one of my interns that pays attention to that stuff handles all of that.

j/k Glad you are entertained....

My thread here isn't to attack Tim Harper if that is how some of you decide to interpret it, which many of you will because that's more dramatic for you to look at it that way. My thread here is to convey my inner thoughts about the game and the meaning of what the game represents to me in the nature of competing, and I'm glad you found it to be interesting in some way.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by brigmar


Something's up with your logic circuits:

You think you have a stronger team.
Therefore it was valid for Hogg to boost to get the W, and the 'props'.
Yet when he does, the boost excuse comes out, and he was a chicken to boost, that he didn't "man up" and play you straight.
Yet you have the stronger team, right ?
Right?

One of you two put the money where their mouth is; The other, the foot.


Nope, nothing wrong here.

The props are when I think my team is stronger but he thinks his is stronger and we are playing on the same playing field, we both dont use boosts, or both have used boots. That hasn't happened yet.

NOTE: thinking my team is stronger is based upon subjective criteria as well as boosting, if you want to debate what ingredients make a stronger team then you need to delineate that before bringing the concept of thinking a team is stronger invalidates my logic on the concept we are discussing. You can't just bundle all of this stuff in and make it black and white, you are trying to combine too much without establishing the framework for what your terms represent and what the values of your contentions are.

Your team is better......... In your eyes pal. You are a loser and all last night I tried arguing hoping others in the USA Pro would see how dumb yu sounded and tonight you did me a favor with this thread and confirming how ignorant and STUPID you are! Keep up the good work patting yourself on the back. Im sure when your arm gets tired Manning on your team will help you out. You guys really are not as good as you think you are. Seriously dont think I NEEDED to boost to beat you. It had NOTHING to do with your team in general as much as the 3 games in a row I had and I wanted to try and win 2 outta the 3. You can keep thinking how smart you are but you have done absolutely NOTHING in this game buddy!

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by tiger5

TSE (aka God), you keep us all entertained tonight. Well done. Thanks for this lighthearted thread.



My thread here isn't to attack Tim Harper if that is how some of you decide to interpret it, which many of you will because that's more dramatic for you to look at it that way. My thread here is to convey my inner thoughts about the game and the meaning of what the game represents to me in the nature of competing, and I'm glad you found it to be interesting in some way.


Are you SERIOUS. Read your first post. It isnt to attack Tim Harper?????????


(Scratching my head)


HUH???????


It is only ATTACKING Tim Harper and nothing else what so ever. Which is cool cause I have had fun attacking Tammy too but now you are trying to say you were giving insite in this or that or giving knowledge of so in so lalalalala what???? You are a freaking JOKE man!