Warrior General Games

Originally posted by PackMan97
Doger, thanks! We were struggling in the first half to get these breakout wins! Sorry it had to come at your expense. Good luck in your fight for the playoffs!

Brickhouse, thanks for doing these predictions. Even if they are for fun, they add to everyone's enjoyment. It's amazing...there may actually be a team I hate more than the Clamchowders.

I love New England Clam Chowder.

Originally posted by Mavricks99
Killbottom........you talk a lot of shit for Ho........How are you helping that team with two lvl 16 players.....
Level 16 is like the average level for our roster, super genius.

It's not my fault shitty teams packed full of level 21~s keep losing to us. Or maybe it is, who knows?

Thats the difference in the east and the west. Your conference has so many teams with low ass starting lineups. Come play in our conference and you'd win 4 games.

Originally posted by Mavricks99
Thats the difference in the east and the west. Your conference has so many teams with low ass starting lineups. Come play in our conference and you'd win 4 games.

1. Honolulu Warriors typical level: 22
1. Indianapolis Gangsters typical level 20

2. Houston Outlaws typical level: 20
2. Charlotte Clamjousters typical level: 21

3. Hollywood Stars typical level: 20
3. Ho Playbook typical level: 17-18~

4. Omaha Shockers typical level: 17-18~
4. Miami Carniceros typical level: 19-20~

5. South Texas Thunder typical level: 20
5. St. Louis Beer Barons typical level: 20 (with a single level 12)

6. Cary Carpetbaggers typical level: 20
6. New York Doom typical level: 20

7. Kansas City Wiz typical level: 19
7. Montpelier Morticians typical level: 19

8. Scranton Tunas: 19-20
8. Radio City Irrelevants: 20

9. Vancouver Lions: 18-19
9. Cleveland Steamer: 17-18

10. Riverside Renegades: 19
10. Chicago Dire Wolves: 18

11. The Elite Sea Team: 19-20
11. Miami Sharks: 18-19

12. El Paso Bandits: 18
12. Palmyra Cougars: 17-18

At this point I got bored and also came to a few conclusions:

The Scranton Tunas would be about as unremarkable in the East as they are in the West.

Honolulu better win the championship or that will kind of suck for them.

West is grossly over-rated solely because Honolulu is on it.

Omaha Shockers are probably the best team in the West.

East is better!

Originally posted by Killbottom
Originally posted by Mavricks99

Killbottom........you talk a lot of shit for Ho........How are you helping that team with two lvl 16 players.....
Level 16 is like the average level for our roster, super genius.

It's not my fault shitty teams packed full of level 21~s keep losing to us. Or maybe it is, who knows?

I knew they couldn't resist coming in here to start crap It's like.. soooo predictable already.

Originally posted by jimbohawk
East is better!

Who invites these kids to read the BBB9 forums?

Is the chaos in our forums really that big a draw?

All i'm gonna suggest is that all the west conference guys avoid posting in the Ho's topics because it only gives them the attention they so much crave. Just my opinion.

Its amazing. Whatever happened to the guy that wanted 'ethicities'.

Your rating system really means squat, if you did an average of the entire lineup based, weighted with the percentage of plays they play per game it would actually show something.

Even if you just did the entire lineups average level it would be far more worthwhile.

Originally posted by BrickHouse
Its amazing. Whatever happened to the guy that wanted 'ethicities'.

Your rating system really means squat, if you did an average of the entire lineup based, weighted with the percentage of plays they play per game it would actually show something.

Even if you just did the entire lineups average level it would be far more worthwhile.

That would be way too much work. Plus, he was only talking about starting lineups.

But basically what I'm saying is that all of those goobers on teams with records just above breaking even pretending that they'd be amazing in a different conference are fooling themselves. About the only thing it proves is that your team can't cut it when going up against teams with similar levels.

Originally posted by Killbottom
Originally posted by BrickHouse

Its amazing. Whatever happened to the guy that wanted 'ethicities'.

Your rating system really means squat, if you did an average of the entire lineup based, weighted with the percentage of plays they play per game it would actually show something.

Even if you just did the entire lineups average level it would be far more worthwhile.

That would be way too much work.

Almost as much work as staying out of a conference specific thread?

No, but close.