Warrior General Games

Let's not forget it's almost season 100, so eat some fiber today.

Originally posted by zz man


THIS ^^^^ THIS ^^^^ THIS

Because Missed Tackles > Catch/deflect anything lol ....Lets Go D !!!

And yet I can get Death Grip instead, get a 75% chance of hanging on until help arrives, and not take any penalties.

Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
And yet I can get Death Grip instead, get a 75% chance of hanging on until help arrives, and not take any penalties.

or

get both

Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
And yet I can get Death Grip instead, get a 75% chance of hanging on until help arrives, and not take any penalties.

I like D Vs G on lighter dots and DG on heavier dots as a general rule
And yes both is better than either !!!

Originally posted by zz man
I like D Vs G on lighter dots and DG on heavier dots as a general rule
And yes both is better than either !!!

plus you will lose morale if you miss the tackle anyway

bottom line, do whatever you can to make the tackle

Originally posted by reddogrw
DvG adds +15% MT to dots with already an AE of +15% MT ad now you are +30% MT

when facing all these power running teams, tackling is at a premium

DvG + DG + ST + 70+ tackling + MT% AE is how coverage corners are tackling machines as well

Do whatever you can, given your role, to make the tackle as much as possible. That being said, some are meant to be tackling/punishing machines, some as combos, some as occupiers, others to be pick-meisters.

Originally posted by reddogrw
plus you will lose morale if you miss the tackle anyway

bottom line, do whatever you can to make the tackle

...yeah, and you will lose also lol. I agree. Nothing that helps makes tackles can be bad.


I know this is O/T because its a SA, but I was gonna say Surge. Not that its bad by any means, but there are other things which seem more effective. The parameters of Surge don't see it fire all that often when you really need it. What I mean is that a RB really shouldn't need surge to make hay- if he's running through truck sized holes all day. When you really need it is when there is a lot of traffic and that's when it seems least likely to fire. That'd be my logic in choosing something else.

I think I brought up a SA, because I really don't believe there are any VAs that people use that are worse than any others. I think for one, the developers of the game knew what they were doing and put a ton of time into this game to avoid having worthless abilities. There was a time that I thought a lot of the VAs seemed worthless but then I'd see someone use one of those effectively, often in unexpected ways. Too many times for me to say any VA is worse than another. All of them I suspect can be very effective if used correctly.

"All of them I suspect can be very effective if used correctly."

This - I asked Bort specifically on how many VA points it would take to fire and whether any were better than others and he laughed and said, "they ALL work, and while it's up it's up to the meta to figure it out, any more than one point increases odds"