Warrior General Games

Originally posted by ClutchDreams
How about it costs the same amount and we don't get any flex back once we retire? That'd get bort some profit.

this I would not be interested in

Originally posted by El Kabong
Would be a money grab if true

But if the people want insta-plateau dots and Bort can make money from this, he should do it.

why not do insta dots like temp ce? pay a flat non-refundable fee for a 1 season player? would be a great stop gap for teams missing just a few dots.

but i still dont think that instadots will b the big announcement, because euchrid said that it wasnt going to be an implemented suggestion, and instadots has been suggested many times. its been a full season now since it was hinted that there would be an announcement, so i doubt that anything happens at all since that has never been suggested...lol

Because bort doesn't code this game anymore ldo.

Originally posted by TrevJo
Is this the feature you're asking for?
http://www.pensacolainsuranceinspections.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Money_Down_The_Toilet.jpg

LMAO

Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
why not do insta dots like temp ce? pay a flat non-refundable fee for a 1 season player? would be a great stop gap for teams missing just a few dots.


I was thinking this as well.

Originally posted by El Kabong
ummm, that's exactly my point. the dominant teams/groups would have an even easier time staying put if current structure stayed as is and i79 put in place, hence the rest of my post

Yes... but what I'm saying is that networks and established teams are already the only teams doing anything under the old system.

Your argument that instant 79s will make them dominate the WL ignores the fact that they are already the only teams dominating the WL.

Originally posted by gbororats
What about algs?

Maybe we don't need them if we aren't actually training for 280+ days. You are thinking of how to complicate the system, what we need is a way to uncomplicate the system.

Originally posted by AlBarsch
I like building players over the course of time and watching them develop, that's part of the appeal... In this world of instant gratification, we all want to go straight to the end game, eh? Don't you have to level up and gain attributes and buffs in just about any game worth playing?

Cool. The fact that you like waiting a year before you start adding SAs to your dots makes you special, like in that mentally deficient way.

Originally posted by haole
Why yes, that is the feature they're requesting.

I won't be one of the people jumping on the Instadot bandwagon unless there's a significant discount, which we all know there won't be.

If the cost per season was the same, why wouldn't you want this?

Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
why not do insta dots like temp ce? pay a flat non-refundable fee for a 1 season player? would be a great stop gap for teams missing just a few dots.

but i still dont think that instadots will b the big announcement, because euchrid said that it wasnt going to be an implemented suggestion, and instadots has been suggested many times. its been a full season now since it was hinted that there would be an announcement, so i doubt that anything happens at all since that has never been suggested...lol

The point is, the minors are a cesspool and a wasteland. The time that it takes to get from level 1 to level 79 was significantly shortened, but it still takes well over a year.

They either need to make building a dot a six month max project or they need to just make it instant L79s.

Then you scrap Pee Wee, because it is redundant, and you scrap the lolMinors because there are no longer any non-L79 dots in the game.

You can't introduce any half measures, because none of those things are going to bring people back and WGG has proven unable to introduce any new players to these games.

Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
kinda fucks with the current dots though.

Yeah. That's the one thing that all of this talk about 'instant dots', or even my idea, runs into every time. What do you do with the current crop of teams and dots?

Originally posted by Time Trial
Yes... but what I'm saying is that networks and established teams are already the only teams doing anything under the old system.

Your argument that instant 79s will make them dominate the WL ignores the fact that they are already the only teams dominating the WL..

No, I never said that those networks weren't already dominant. I offered solutions that would even the playing field because I believe that those already dominating would be able to dominate even MORE with I79s if current system was maintained.

Originally posted by El Kabong
No, I never said that those networks weren't already dominant. I offered solutions that would even the playing field because I believe that those already dominating would be able to dominate even MORE with I79s if current system was maintained.


hasnt the same team won like 4 seasons in a row? not sure how they can dominate anymore than that.

Giving more teams enough good dots to fill rosters increases parity it doesn't decrease it. Anyone who thinks more good L79 dots from insta-79's decreases parity is an idiot imo.

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Giving more teams enough good dots to fill rosters increases parity it doesn't decrease it. Anyone who thinks more good L79 dots from insta-79's decreases parity is an idiot imo.

+1

increased quantity doesn't automatically increase parity, especially not when the quantity is dependent on inactive agents coming back and having to play catch up on builds and AIs.