Warrior General Games

It never ceases to amaze me the exaggerated perspective so many people have of their own dots.

I'm sure a play like you describe is possible but I have only to look at his build to know that can't possibly be the norm, and my earlier spot check of his actual plays have confirmed it. When he gets pancaked like he did 55 times last season, he's not taking out 2 blockers or even 1. When he's not pancaked almost any o-line or FB will handle him pretty easily. He only had 18 tackles last season, and only 4 were for loss, with 16 whiffs, so even if he gets by his blocker, the HB has a good chance to get by him anyway. I've watched enough film and seen this kind of build on film to know that most of the tackles he dies make are pursuit-type after the runner gets a few yards downfield. If he were really holding up against run blocking like you describe then way more than 4 of his 34 tackle attempts from last season would have been for loss.

quick little scout through last season.

guess this play sucked. he sure did let him gain a few yards http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2590862&pbp_id=1250746

http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2590694&pbp_id=3342859 fuck he may be the worst blitzing LB to be used as a run stuffer in all of GLB

http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2590694&pbp_id=3341433 fuck i hate him. cant even stop a guy in the backfield.

a lot of his tackles are 1-2 yards past LOS. if you think a 2 yard gain is good, i feel bad for you wasting your time on this game.

PS. no need to be jelly. maybe when he hits decline, ill keep him around for you to use. hopefully we get to see you next season. much love.

What a joke! We already established he had 4 tackles for losses last season so you show 3 highlights of his tackles for losses? And does that change the fact that he had almost as many missed tackles as tackles, or that he only 11%-12% of his tackle attempts resulted in losses (for a guy who was normally behind the LOS coming on a hard blitz) or that he got pancaked 55 times? Maybe if I show you 50 highlights of him getting pancaked you'll start to understand that he's not providing run defense of any kind on those plays?

It's just hilarious to me what some of you guys think will pass as an effective argument. He's horrible against the run. That doesn't mean he never makes a good play against the run. As I stated from the start he had 4 tackles for losses last season and you've now shown highlights of 3 of his tackles for losses. But even though even a blind squirrel can find a nut sometimes, the vast majority of the time he's really bad against the run. Show us 15 clips of him missing tackles last season while you're continuing to refuse to accept something so simple to understand which is that he doesn't have a good build for stopping the run and especially not for a player who spends most of his time on the LOS.

Originally posted by Sly
What a joke! We already established he had 4 tackles for losses last season so you show 3 highlights of his tackles for losses? And does that change the fact that he had almost as many missed tackles as tackles, or that he only 11%-12% of his tackle attempts resulted in losses (for a guy who was normally behind the LOS coming on a hard blitz) or that he got pancaked 55 times? Maybe if I show you 50 highlights of him getting pancaked you'll start to understand that he's not providing run defense of any kind on those plays?

It's just hilarious to me what some of you guys think will pass as an effective argument. He's horrible against the run. That doesn't mean he never makes a good play against the run. As I stated from the start he had 4 tackles for losses last season and you've now shown highlights of 3 of his tackles for losses. But even though even a blind squirrel can find a nut sometimes, the vast majority of the time he's really bad against the run. Show us 15 clips of him missing tackles last season while you're continuing to refuse to accept something so simple to understand which is that he doesn't have a good build for stopping the run and especially not for a player who spends most of his time on the LOS.

The joke is you know so much but have won so little EVER

Originally posted by cubsluver22
The joke is you know so much but have won so little EVER

i dont think i ever got someone so riled up so easily especially with such a shitty looking dot.

i love these forums

Good strategy - now pretend that you couldn't care less about that dot you managed to sneak onto a good WL team. I'm sure we're all buying it. I know I am! At least the truth is finally beginning to sink in about his limitations.

Originally posted by ProfessionalKop

i love these forums


KTT>

tbh

Originally posted by Sly
Good strategy - now pretend that you couldn't care less about that dot you managed to sneak onto a good WL team. I'm sure we're all buying it. I know I am! At least the truth is finally beginning to sink in about his limitations.

sneak on? he has been there since rookie. Baby Sizzle brought Texas multiple titles, no need to pretend you dont want him. He's the heart and soul of this entire game.



Originally posted by JBStar23
KTT>

tbh

idkwhat that means

Kanyetothe

I can't use your LB. He's a bad build. He's a liability and any good OC will be able to win by taking advantage of him. Your LB is a very clear example of the kind of thoughtless, rubber-stamp builds I don't want. I'm sorry he's the best you can do. You're not a good enough builder to put a dot on CCIA.

Originally posted by Sly
I can't use your LB. He's a bad build. He's a liability and any good OC will be able to win by taking advantage of him. Your LB is a very clear example of the kind of thoughtless, rubber-stamp builds I don't want. I'm sorry he's the best you can do. You're not a good enough builder to put a dot on CCIA.

i guess a bunch of those WL OCs suck eh. fuckin pussies.

long live Sizzle. feel it.

You said they suck. Truth is most of them do suck. Most of them run thoughtless, rubber-stamp OC systems they probably borrowed from someone else. To go with their team's thoughtless, rubber-stamp builds.

Yea, long live bad builds like Sizzle. Just makes it easier for those of us that can think.

Originally posted by Sly
You said they suck. Truth is most of them do suck. Most of them run thoughtless, rubber-stamp OC systems they probably borrowed from someone else. To go with their team's thoughtless, rubber-stamp builds.

Yea, long live bad builds like Sizzle. Just makes it easier for those of us that can think.

For someone that can think, someone that knows builds and AI's better than anyone.....why is it you never have won anything of relevance?

Wow that's really amusing because Scrubs is a never was who can't coordinate at all but likes to pick up lol trophies for positions where he does nothing, Scrubs doesn't even have a basic understanding of how the AI actually works as attested to in depth by the real coordinators that did the real work for which he tried to also take credit. Really sad TBH. His waitress job is so unfulfilling and therefore he has to try and steal credit for the accomplishments of others in GLB. Go wash some dishes about it, Scrubs!

Originally posted by Sly
Wow that's really amusing because Scrubs is a never was who can't coordinate at all but likes to pick up lol trophies for positions where he does nothing, Scrubs doesn't even have a basic understanding of how the AI actually works as attested to in depth by the real coordinators that did the real work for which he tried to also take credit. Really sad TBH. His waitress job is so unfulfilling and therefore he has to try and steal credit for the accomplishments of others in GLB. Go wash some dishes about it, Scrubs!

Open your mouth, got something I wanna serve ya