Originally posted by Lore
Okay, so it's not a huge deal, the world isn't coming to an end, but if I do it right and beat a human owned team and then do the same thing next game and lose to a CPU team, what am I doing wrong? And that is with a team with zero CPU players.
I swore to myself that this would never be a topic that I would ever discuss again. But the only response - having asked this myself a number of times - has always been the same answer; "I have never lost to a CPU team". WTF... So why are human owned teams with human built players losing to CPU teams, when they have clearly shown that they can beat human owned teams?
And if the response is " I have never lost to a CPU team" then do, please, explain... Or is that just they way it used to be?
There could be a very wide variety of problems, the most notable of which being poor builds and poor AI. I don't give 5% when I take on a team responsibility though, and I make damn sure we will be competitive. Very rarely do I put up less than 100 on a CPU team at any level. If I recall it may be more difficult to do that in rookie, but losing is not even a prospect. The teams that are losing to CPUs I would almost invariably consider disorganized and with builds that I would never sign.
Okay, so it's not a huge deal, the world isn't coming to an end, but if I do it right and beat a human owned team and then do the same thing next game and lose to a CPU team, what am I doing wrong? And that is with a team with zero CPU players. I swore to myself that this would never be a topic that I would ever discuss again. But the only response - having asked this myself a number of times - has always been the same answer; "I have never lost to a CPU team". WTF... So why are human owned teams with human built players losing to CPU teams, when they have clearly shown that they can beat human owned teams?
And if the response is " I have never lost to a CPU team" then do, please, explain... Or is that just they way it used to be?
There could be a very wide variety of problems, the most notable of which being poor builds and poor AI. I don't give 5% when I take on a team responsibility though, and I make damn sure we will be competitive. Very rarely do I put up less than 100 on a CPU team at any level. If I recall it may be more difficult to do that in rookie, but losing is not even a prospect. The teams that are losing to CPUs I would almost invariably consider disorganized and with builds that I would never sign.
Edited by Donk3yMan on May 30, 2014 21:01:44





























