Warrior General Games

Originally posted by BadBuc99
I think they did a great job at writing the code for GLB2. That's my positive post of the day.

IMO tho, if they redid GLB classic from scratch (code wise), then this would be a money cash.

I'm still gonna play GLB 2 tho. When my team hits plateau, then I'm gonna sink some serious time in it...and fubar every team we play..........if there is any left.

Don't you get it?
That is what they tried and it is called GLB2

If you don't know already, the claim is they would not "Fix" or "Change" anything with GLB1 because it would be too much of a headache and I doubt they really know how to without FUBAR 'ing it.

Thus, the "braintrusts" ingeniously devised a way to create GLB1 from scratch without FUBAR 'ing the original GLB1... GLB2

If this is not plain and clear, I don't know what else to say.

Originally posted by dahman32
Don't you get it?
That is what they tried and it is called GLB2

If you don't know already, the claim is they would not "Fix" or "Change" anything with GLB1 because it would be too much of a headache and I doubt they really know how to without FUBAR 'ing it.

Thus, the "braintrusts" ingeniously devised a way to create GLB1 from scratch without FUBAR 'ing the original GLB1... GLB2

If this is not plain and clear, I don't know what else to say.

Ahhh, no.

Originally posted by KingCheez
I'd rather walk into oncoming traffic than play that POS

Pretty much the same thing, so you'll have fun

Originally posted by dahman32
Don't you get it?
That is what they tried and it is called GLB2

If you don't know already, the claim is they would not "Fix" or "Change" anything with GLB1 because it would be too much of a headache and I doubt they really know how to without FUBAR 'ing it.

Thus, the "braintrusts" ingeniously devised a way to create GLB1 from scratch without FUBAR 'ing the original GLB1... GLB2

If this is not plain and clear, I don't know what else to say.

Redo glb2, then. Because obviously, it isn't working (not fun for most people).

Originally posted by PaqMarq11
Redo glb2, then. Because obviously, it isn't working (not fun for most people)

More people are playing GLB2 than GLB1, so not sure how that logic holds.

Originally posted by Corndog
You should try GLB2.

Tried it and hate it.

Originally posted by Corndog
More people are playing GLB2 than GLB1, so not sure how that logic holds.



Dot-search total for GLB1 (all levels, active agents only, not including retired or CPU dots, aged 0-520 only)
- 41,761

Bot-search total for GLB2 (all levels, not including retired or CPU bots)
- 28,594

Originally posted by Corndog
More people are playing GLB2 than GLB1, so not sure how that logic holds.



Did a couple of new users at GLB2 buy HoF packages?

Originally posted by Novus
Originally posted by Corndog

More people are playing GLB2 than GLB1, so not sure how that logic holds.



Dot-search total for GLB1 (all levels, active agents only, not including retired or CPU dots, aged 0-520 only)
- 41,761

Bot-search total for GLB2 (all levels, not including retired or CPU bots)
- 28,594



More people doesn't mean more dots. There could definitely be more people playing GLB2, but you might not have the single agents with 10s to 100s of dots each like you see on GLB1.

Originally posted by spindoctor02
More people doesn't mean more dots. There could definitely be more people playing GLB2, but you might not have the single agents with 10s to 100s of dots each like you see on GLB1.

Certainly possible, I suppose. I was just expecting to see a bit more bots than that on GLB2 based on the strength of Corndog's statement. The numbers don't really back up his high level of confidence.

Plus, keep in mind that on GLB2, there's no way to screen out inactive users in that player search like I did on the GLB1 search. So, that GLB2 search will include every single bot that was ever created and then abandoned, while the GLB1 total only includes people who are actively playing their dots.

Originally posted by Novus
Originally posted by Corndog

More people are playing GLB2 than GLB1, so not sure how that logic holds.



Dot-search total for GLB1 (all levels, active agents only, not including retired or CPU dots, aged 0-520 only)
- 41,761

Bot-search total for GLB2 (all levels, not including retired or CPU bots)
- 28,594



He said more people not dots.
Pretty sure more multis are playing GLB1 than 2.

Originally posted by Novus
Certainly possible, I suppose. I was just expecting to see a bit more bots than that on GLB2 based on the strength of Corndog's statement. The numbers don't really back up his high level of confidence.

Plus, keep in mind that on GLB2, there's no way to screen out inactive users in that player search like I did on the GLB1 search. So, that GLB2 search will include every single bot that was ever created and then abandoned, while the GLB1 total only includes people who are actively playing their dots.

THERE'S THIRTY THOUSAND PEOPLE PLAYING AND SOME OF THEM BUY HOF PACKAGES AHAHAHRAAAWWWRRRR

Originally posted by jimmiejoe
He said more people not dots.
Pretty sure more multis are playing GLB1 than 2.

Not really, I know a number of people that created fucktads of multis for 2.0 early on for obvious reasons.