User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Keep it going
Page:
 
Savitar
Ghost Recon
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
Instant 79's is a last ditch effort to the game unless you are adding more to player building on top of that.


Wrong, wrong , wrong.

Instant any lvl you want would only enhance the game.
 
Guppy, Inc
online
Link
 
dont allow ALL positions to be built, just the positions that have a shortage. and i mean be able to build ANY level. when a new 120 day team looks for players, and there are zero safeties any where, why should that owner buy a team he knows he cant staff? i like how people assume the only age that should be bought is 79. i never said a thing about 79. hell, i even said MID LEVEL. thats the problem. people get a single idea in their minds then cant move that idea out long enough to think of the variations of that idea. but then again, i never expect anything out of bhall who proves yet again he doesnt bother to read.
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Team Nucleus
Nostradamus was wrong...chances are you are also...your missing the point he made about bringing in new customers..kinda hard when this site does zero advertising


Instant 79s does absolutely nothing to bring in new customers.
 
Guppy, Inc
online
Link
 
Originally posted by Corndog
Instant 79s does absolutely nothing to bring in new customers.


but it would help teams fill gaps which would stop some teams from folding
Edited by Guppy, Inc on Feb 22, 2014 02:51:41
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by BadBuc99
Wrong, wrong , wrong.

Instant any lvl you want would only enhance the game.


It isn't enhancing anything. It's just a quick way to burn flex, see end builds you have been meaning to try, and fill gaps to teams. But it isn't enhancing the game really at all. The game still is the same game we have been playing for 10+ seasons. And let's be real. The only leagues surviving insta's are pro and pee wee. The rest is ded.
 
Team Nucleus
Draft Man
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Corndog
Instant 79s does absolutely nothing to bring in new customers.


no advertising does absolutely nothing to bring in new customers...now that's a fact
 
Gustoon
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
dont allow ALL positions to be built, just the positions that have a shortage. and i mean be able to build ANY level. when a new 120 day team looks for players, and there are zero safeties any where, why should that owner buy a team he knows he cant staff? i like how people assume the only age that should be bought is 79. i never said a thing about 79. hell, i even said MID LEVEL. thats the problem. people get a single idea in their minds then cant move that idea out long enough to think of the variations of that idea. but then again, i never expect anything out of bhall who proves yet again he doesnt bother to read.


Common sense. Theres the problem right there
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
Honestly, the only "fix" that I've really liked the idea of is just embracing GLB1's hardcoreness.

Rebrand it as GLB: Tactics, have users buy entire teams for like 5,000 flex a season or something, that covers all boosts, CEQ, etc.

Obvious downside is that it prices people out.
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Team Nucleus
no advertising does absolutely nothing to bring in new customers...now that's a fact


We are advertising.

It brings in a little bit of users, so you got that right.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
dont allow ALL positions to be built, just the positions that have a shortage. and i mean be able to build ANY level. when a new 120 day team looks for players, and there are zero safeties any where, why should that owner buy a team he knows he cant staff? i like how people assume the only age that should be bought is 79. i never said a thing about 79. hell, i even said MID LEVEL. thats the problem. people get a single idea in their minds then cant move that idea out long enough to think of the variations of that idea. but then again, i never expect anything out of bhall who proves yet again he doesnt bother to read.


You think people are really gonna create mid level players? Why in the hell would they do that?
 
Guppy, Inc
online
Link
 
Originally posted by Corndog
Honestly, the only "fix" that I've really liked the idea of is just embracing GLB1's hardcoreness.

Rebrand it as GLB: Tactics, have users buy entire teams for like 5,000 flex a season or something, that covers all boosts, CEQ, etc.

Obvious downside is that it prices people out.


how many people really want to run an entire team including all the players? thats a huge time commitment.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Corndog
Honestly, the only "fix" that I've really liked the idea of is just embracing GLB1's hardcoreness.

Rebrand it as GLB: Tactics, have users buy entire teams for like 5,000 flex a season or something, that covers all boosts, CEQ, etc.

Obvious downside is that it prices people out.


That would be interesting.
 
Guppy, Inc
online
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
You think people are really gonna create mid level players? Why in the hell would they do that?


because there are no FAs any more. whats so hard to figure out that if someone has 50 players but cant find any safeties that many would build an instant safety over using a cpu? i play at those levels and know many people that would go that route to fill a team.
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
how many people really want to run an entire team including all the players? thats a huge time commitment.


How many people really want to do much of anything?

We have a game that is more aimed at casual users.
 
Team Nucleus
Draft Man
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Corndog
We are advertising.

It brings in a little bit of users, so you got that right.


ok you mis-read maybe it was my wording my fault....by *not advertising*...it does absolutely nothing to bring in new customers...now that's a fact
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.