This would work but it would have to be totally recognized both parts of GLB. customers and the Company .You are going to need some voices to speak for the user base and instead of fighting or yelling they would need to better enforce their argument with reasons and facts for the betterment of both parties.Like hatch was saying Very dependable people on both sides that would want this to happen and work for all and the betterment of GLB and or GLB2.Good Luck.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > GLB Players Association
Originally posted by MV Thunder
This would work but it would have to be totally recognized both parts of GLB. customers and the Company .You are going to need some voices to speak for the user base and instead of fighting or yelling they would need to better enforce their argument with reasons and facts for the betterment of both parties.Like hatch was saying Very dependable people on both sides that would want this to happen and work for all and the betterment of GLB and or GLB2.Good Luck.
Added to the OP...Thank you for adding extensive information
This would work but it would have to be totally recognized both parts of GLB. customers and the Company .You are going to need some voices to speak for the user base and instead of fighting or yelling they would need to better enforce their argument with reasons and facts for the betterment of both parties.Like hatch was saying Very dependable people on both sides that would want this to happen and work for all and the betterment of GLB and or GLB2.Good Luck.
Added to the OP...Thank you for adding extensive information
Originally posted by RiverRat2
There are those awesome PR skills you are so well known for.
Can you afford to piss off all of your customers?
You really don't get it, do you?
There are those awesome PR skills you are so well known for.
Can you afford to piss off all of your customers?
You really don't get it, do you?
Originally posted by AirMcMVP
You really don't get it, do you?
Explain please.....that's something I'd also like to know
Double standed should be eliminated....set an example for the rules in place....
If certain rules are violated enforce them.....but that goes for everyone....not just the userbase...
Not going to point anyone out anymore but this weekend was memorable to say the least...
It could have all been handled in a much more peaceful manor
You really don't get it, do you?
Explain please.....that's something I'd also like to know
Double standed should be eliminated....set an example for the rules in place....
If certain rules are violated enforce them.....but that goes for everyone....not just the userbase...
Not going to point anyone out anymore but this weekend was memorable to say the least...
It could have all been handled in a much more peaceful manor
Originally posted by Team Nucleus
Explain please.....that's something I'd also like to know
If GLB shuts down it will have 0 effect on my life. I'm sure I could survive without the flex I get for bugs mod duty if the game shuts down. RR2 doesn't seem to get that.
As for the rest, there are definitely parts of the past week or so they I'm not happy with. I just don't think this idea is viable.
Explain please.....that's something I'd also like to know
If GLB shuts down it will have 0 effect on my life. I'm sure I could survive without the flex I get for bugs mod duty if the game shuts down. RR2 doesn't seem to get that.
As for the rest, there are definitely parts of the past week or so they I'm not happy with. I just don't think this idea is viable.
Originally posted by SikoraP13 DTD
I'd argue the best shot would be to create a GLBPA with essentially a grouping of people, who are elected by their peers
Originally posted by AirMcMVP
Large companies (EA, Blizzard, Zynga, etc.) can utilize focus groups to figure out what direction to go with product updates and new product releases but a smaller company like Warrior General Games can't afford that luxury.
OK so I piece-mailed some posts because they inspired me a bit.... This isn't exactly what you are talking about, but, what if we did have a "focus group" of users (now don't get me wrong, we have used several site surveys, forums, Mods, Testers, even non-users etc in the past, we aren't flying blindly). These users would be available for quick pulse checks on site "morale" so to speak, game changes, suggestions etc. Membership would require answering short surveys as needed. It would give us a mailing list of reliable responders.
I'd argue the best shot would be to create a GLBPA with essentially a grouping of people, who are elected by their peers
Originally posted by AirMcMVP
Large companies (EA, Blizzard, Zynga, etc.) can utilize focus groups to figure out what direction to go with product updates and new product releases but a smaller company like Warrior General Games can't afford that luxury.
OK so I piece-mailed some posts because they inspired me a bit.... This isn't exactly what you are talking about, but, what if we did have a "focus group" of users (now don't get me wrong, we have used several site surveys, forums, Mods, Testers, even non-users etc in the past, we aren't flying blindly). These users would be available for quick pulse checks on site "morale" so to speak, game changes, suggestions etc. Membership would require answering short surveys as needed. It would give us a mailing list of reliable responders.
Originally posted by AirMcMVP
If GLB shuts down it will have 0 effect on my life. I'm sure I could survive without the flex I get for bugs mod duty if the game shuts down. RR2 doesn't seem to get that.
As for the rest, there are definitely parts of the past week or so they I'm not happy with. I just don't think this idea is viable.
Sorry you feel that way....I don't agree...I find it very viable....It's called organization and structure for a better relashionship between the customers and Bort & Company.
If GLB shuts down it will have 0 effect on my life. I'm sure I could survive without the flex I get for bugs mod duty if the game shuts down. RR2 doesn't seem to get that.
As for the rest, there are definitely parts of the past week or so they I'm not happy with. I just don't think this idea is viable.
Sorry you feel that way....I don't agree...I find it very viable....It's called organization and structure for a better relashionship between the customers and Bort & Company.
Originally posted by EllisBell
OK so I piece-mailed some posts because they inspired me a bit.... This isn't exactly what you are talking about, but, what if we did have a "focus group" of users (now don't get me wrong, we have used several site surveys, forums, Mods, Testers, even non-users etc in the past, we aren't flying blindly). These users would be available for quick pulse checks on site "morale" so to speak, game changes, suggestions etc. Membership would require answering short surveys as needed. It would give us a mailing list of reliable responders.
I agree....I see 0 negatives...only positives from this
OK so I piece-mailed some posts because they inspired me a bit.... This isn't exactly what you are talking about, but, what if we did have a "focus group" of users (now don't get me wrong, we have used several site surveys, forums, Mods, Testers, even non-users etc in the past, we aren't flying blindly). These users would be available for quick pulse checks on site "morale" so to speak, game changes, suggestions etc. Membership would require answering short surveys as needed. It would give us a mailing list of reliable responders.
I agree....I see 0 negatives...only positives from this
Mob-6
offline
offline
Not the new GLBPA even tho it was fun and useful for like never.
On a serious note:
I believe a central group could be put in place of a lemonade stand for public relations between the customer and the developer/admins.
Changes,updates,user issues could be handled by the group and ignored by the developer and admins.
My thought in this is it would relieve the developer and admins from direct contact with the userbase and not leave themselves open for criticism for spending even more time creeping the forums with their alts.
The GLBP Union would handle the situation with guidance from Catch instead.
What's most important....GLB.... facials on future issues...
Currently we don't have that luxury.....
On a serious note:
I believe a central group could be put in place of a lemonade stand for public relations between the customer and the developer/admins.
Changes,updates,user issues could be handled by the group and ignored by the developer and admins.
My thought in this is it would relieve the developer and admins from direct contact with the userbase and not leave themselves open for criticism for spending even more time creeping the forums with their alts.
The GLBP Union would handle the situation with guidance from Catch instead.
What's most important....GLB.... facials on future issues...
Currently we don't have that luxury.....
Mob-6
offline
offline
Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
The thread GLB Players Union has been merged into this thread
So much for a rival union. Now I know how the American Football League felt.
The thread GLB Players Union has been merged into this thread
So much for a rival union. Now I know how the American Football League felt.
Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
The thread GLB Players Union has been merged into this thread
Why even move a copycat thread in here? he's mocking it...did you even read it
The thread GLB Players Union has been merged into this thread
Why even move a copycat thread in here? he's mocking it...did you even read it
Edited by Team Nucleus on Oct 22, 2013 21:39:18
Originally posted by Mob-6
I think I was promised a VP position with the GLBA for merging my union with yours.
Just a discussion at this point.
I think I was promised a VP position with the GLBA for merging my union with yours.
Just a discussion at this point.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
