Originally posted by coachingubigr
RGII is RGIII's father
isnt that Robert Griffin Jr?
RGII is RGIII's father
isnt that Robert Griffin Jr?
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Why Is It Impossible On GLB
Raid
offline
offline
Originally posted by 88Spam
Lol What you fail to realize is that I said many more.
and yet you specifically took the time to point out a bunch of inferior examples.
'There have been some seriously bad leaders in the history of the world, like George Bush and Barack Obama among others'
"Uhhh, what about Hitler? Papa Jo? Mussolini?"
'Lol, I said others'
ಠ_ಠ
Lol What you fail to realize is that I said many more.
and yet you specifically took the time to point out a bunch of inferior examples.
'There have been some seriously bad leaders in the history of the world, like George Bush and Barack Obama among others'
"Uhhh, what about Hitler? Papa Jo? Mussolini?"
'Lol, I said others'
ಠ_ಠ
Raid
offline
offline
Originally posted by Timetoshine-Metta
isnt that Robert Griffin Jr?
It can go either way, but frankly once RGIII is thrown into the mix no longer can II take the title of 'Jr'
isnt that Robert Griffin Jr?
It can go either way, but frankly once RGIII is thrown into the mix no longer can II take the title of 'Jr'
Originally posted by 88Spam
Why is it impossible for a Duel Threat QB To Be Known For Passing And Running
EX:
Michael Vick
RGII
Pat White
Tim Tebow
Doug Flutie
:Many More
This isn't a troll question this is a serious question. Please someone help me understand this I've been playing glb for a couple of years and still don't understand.
PAT WHITE
Why is it impossible for a Duel Threat QB To Be Known For Passing And Running
EX:
Michael Vick
RGII
Pat White
Tim Tebow
Doug Flutie
:Many More
This isn't a troll question this is a serious question. Please someone help me understand this I've been playing glb for a couple of years and still don't understand.
PAT WHITE
Originally posted by DarkRogue
Needs moar Randell Cunningham.
Good candidate. But there's a difference between a "scrambling Qb" and a "running QB". I'd put Kapernik, RG trey, and some of the newer QB's in the "running QB" pile. (yeah... Vick too). But Cunningham, Elway, Montana... even guys like Kenny Stabler and Terry Bradshaw... were more of the "scrambler" variety. They usually only ran when they had to... not as a part of the overall running game (with an occasional bootleg thrown in now and then).
As for the OP's question, I think the answer is simple. If you COULD build a running QB that could also throw good enough to be highly functional in BOTH categories... why would ANYONE build anything but those kind of QB's ever? Throw out the Deep passer and the Pocket passer... you just made them worthless. So GLB wants you to choose one OR the other OR to have both on the team and use them BOTH for what they're made for... rather than have only one type of QB used by the masses.
That said, a good OC can make a decent running QB functional in the passing game... but never good enough to NOT need a "normal" style QB... at least not good enough to win everything with only the running QB type. IMO.
Needs moar Randell Cunningham.
Good candidate. But there's a difference between a "scrambling Qb" and a "running QB". I'd put Kapernik, RG trey, and some of the newer QB's in the "running QB" pile. (yeah... Vick too). But Cunningham, Elway, Montana... even guys like Kenny Stabler and Terry Bradshaw... were more of the "scrambler" variety. They usually only ran when they had to... not as a part of the overall running game (with an occasional bootleg thrown in now and then).
As for the OP's question, I think the answer is simple. If you COULD build a running QB that could also throw good enough to be highly functional in BOTH categories... why would ANYONE build anything but those kind of QB's ever? Throw out the Deep passer and the Pocket passer... you just made them worthless. So GLB wants you to choose one OR the other OR to have both on the team and use them BOTH for what they're made for... rather than have only one type of QB used by the masses.
That said, a good OC can make a decent running QB functional in the passing game... but never good enough to NOT need a "normal" style QB... at least not good enough to win everything with only the running QB type. IMO.
Achelon
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
With all the sensational stuff going on right now this thread is really terrible.
Even without the sensational stuff, this thread is pretty terrible
With all the sensational stuff going on right now this thread is really terrible.
Even without the sensational stuff, this thread is pretty terrible
Achelon
offline
offline
Originally posted by killershrew
Wouldnt RGII really be RG Jr.?
In order to properly use the suffixes I, II, III, Jr. and Sr. you just have to understand what they mean. If a son and a father have the same name 'Jr.' is used to refer to the son and 'Sr.' is used to refer to the father. If a name is passed down through a family, the grandfather would use the 'I' which stands for the first, the father would use the 'ii' which stands for the second and the son would use 'iii' which stands for the third.
So RG1 (Grandfather), RG II (Father) RG III (Future Hall of Famer)
Wouldnt RGII really be RG Jr.?
In order to properly use the suffixes I, II, III, Jr. and Sr. you just have to understand what they mean. If a son and a father have the same name 'Jr.' is used to refer to the son and 'Sr.' is used to refer to the father. If a name is passed down through a family, the grandfather would use the 'I' which stands for the first, the father would use the 'ii' which stands for the second and the son would use 'iii' which stands for the third.
So RG1 (Grandfather), RG II (Father) RG III (Future Hall of Famer)
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
