Originally posted by bhall43
you are all welcome.
you are all welcome.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Changelog: Updated/Added Routes
Toric
offline
offline
Originally posted by AlBarsch
This is now called " FB weak flare" (no longer a screen, so you can set progressions) also notice the FB strong flare has slightly different FB pathing
Thanks boss... ohh I like some of these....
This is now called " FB weak flare" (no longer a screen, so you can set progressions) also notice the FB strong flare has slightly different FB pathing
Thanks boss... ohh I like some of these....
sehorn31
offline
offline
Originally posted by BigRatUno
http://goallineblitz.com/game/offense_play_list.pl
That is just a list of the Plays and it still hasn't no Updated I-Form Fl Hitch or Weak I Streaks among others. To hell with it.... I know my Team's Playbook is still the same and like I said, I logged out and logged back in and made a new Offensive Playbook and it's still the same....
http://goallineblitz.com/game/offense_play_list.pl
That is just a list of the Plays and it still hasn't no Updated I-Form Fl Hitch or Weak I Streaks among others. To hell with it.... I know my Team's Playbook is still the same and like I said, I logged out and logged back in and made a new Offensive Playbook and it's still the same....
Originally posted by Bort
It's mostly just updates to add routes for a HB or FB who didn't have one, but yeah there were more of those plays than I thought when I started going through them.
um are these plays where the RB was just in blocking before in the play schematic? Or where he did it by way of bug????
ahh man this is gonna mean going over all me personnel in the packages....
Well thats okay
Thanks Bort
It's mostly just updates to add routes for a HB or FB who didn't have one, but yeah there were more of those plays than I thought when I started going through them.
um are these plays where the RB was just in blocking before in the play schematic? Or where he did it by way of bug????
ahh man this is gonna mean going over all me personnel in the packages....
Well thats okay
Thanks Bort
Edited by yello1 on Sep 12, 2013 07:15:33
MeI
offline
offline
Originally posted by sehorn31
No extra time for DC's to make adjustments?
You like whine a lot don't you?
No extra time for DC's to make adjustments?
You like whine a lot don't you?
AlBarsch
offline
offline
Originally posted by yello1
ahh man this is gonna mean going over all me personnel in the packages....
I'm confused as to why DCs would have to do anything... In the I formation (and every other formation), there were MANY routes that had both the FB and HB running routes, so you would of had to account for these receivers out of the backfield already, right? You don't have a specific DAi for a specific play - only per formation (and down and distance). There isn't a single formation where either one or both backs weren't going out before - now all of them do. Unless, of course, you had outputs in the DAi that ignored a back in a certain set - but you'd have already gotten burnt by that, right?
ahh man this is gonna mean going over all me personnel in the packages....
I'm confused as to why DCs would have to do anything... In the I formation (and every other formation), there were MANY routes that had both the FB and HB running routes, so you would of had to account for these receivers out of the backfield already, right? You don't have a specific DAi for a specific play - only per formation (and down and distance). There isn't a single formation where either one or both backs weren't going out before - now all of them do. Unless, of course, you had outputs in the DAi that ignored a back in a certain set - but you'd have already gotten burnt by that, right?
Originally posted by AlBarsch
I'm confused as to why DCs would have to do anything... In the I formation (and every other formation), there were MANY routes that had both the FB and HB running routes, so you would of had to account for these receivers out of the backfield already, right? You don't have a specific DAi for a specific play - only per formation (and down and distance). There isn't a single formation where either one or both backs weren't going out before - now all of them do. Unless, of course, you had outputs in the DAi that ignored a back in a certain set - but you'd have already gotten burnt by that, right?
I mean OAI.
If a play had the FB sitting around, I may not have had him be the scat FB.
I guess it doesn't matter because he wouldn't be in the check downs. So I could redo these, or not.
I'm confused as to why DCs would have to do anything... In the I formation (and every other formation), there were MANY routes that had both the FB and HB running routes, so you would of had to account for these receivers out of the backfield already, right? You don't have a specific DAi for a specific play - only per formation (and down and distance). There isn't a single formation where either one or both backs weren't going out before - now all of them do. Unless, of course, you had outputs in the DAi that ignored a back in a certain set - but you'd have already gotten burnt by that, right?
I mean OAI.
If a play had the FB sitting around, I may not have had him be the scat FB.
I guess it doesn't matter because he wouldn't be in the check downs. So I could redo these, or not.
SamsonsToupee
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
you are all welcome.
thanks b
I know you had a hand in this..........scat backs rejoice.....
edit
Also, when will the team playbooks be updated with these new plays?
I went to test a few of these and they are still all the old plays.
you are all welcome.
thanks b
I know you had a hand in this..........scat backs rejoice.....
edit
Also, when will the team playbooks be updated with these new plays?
I went to test a few of these and they are still all the old plays.
Edited by SamsonsToupee on Sep 12, 2013 07:50:13
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by SamsonsToupee
thanks b
I know you had a hand in this..........scat backs rejoice.....
i cant see the plays right now but i know i tried to get the fb deep on some plays so that should be a really nice lift to scat fb's.
thanks b
I know you had a hand in this..........scat backs rejoice.....
i cant see the plays right now but i know i tried to get the fb deep on some plays so that should be a really nice lift to scat fb's.
AlBarsch
offline
offline
Huh, I can see all the new plays... and yes, there are some nice FB deep routes into spaces not previously exploited.
Originally posted by AlBarsch
I'm confused as to why DCs would have to do anything... In the I formation (and every other formation), there were MANY routes that had both the FB and HB running routes, so you would of had to account for these receivers out of the backfield already, right? You don't have a specific DAi for a specific play - only per formation (and down and distance). There isn't a single formation where either one or both backs weren't going out before - now all of them do. Unless, of course, you had outputs in the DAi that ignored a back in a certain set - but you'd have already gotten burnt by that, right?
Depends? You can cheat as a DC on initial dot placement when you know the cluster of plays in a formation that are likely to be called. From that perspective the play book has expanded - assuming the routes are viable.
I'm confused as to why DCs would have to do anything... In the I formation (and every other formation), there were MANY routes that had both the FB and HB running routes, so you would of had to account for these receivers out of the backfield already, right? You don't have a specific DAi for a specific play - only per formation (and down and distance). There isn't a single formation where either one or both backs weren't going out before - now all of them do. Unless, of course, you had outputs in the DAi that ignored a back in a certain set - but you'd have already gotten burnt by that, right?
Depends? You can cheat as a DC on initial dot placement when you know the cluster of plays in a formation that are likely to be called. From that perspective the play book has expanded - assuming the routes are viable.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
