Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jdbolick

Spread definitely has better plays, but that's different from the false notion that 5W is unusable. Those instant blitzes don't exist anymore and haven't for a while now.

its not a viable offense against any good dc. give it up.

Originally posted by Time Trial
I think you misread that quote by Catch the first time you read it.

huh? the gripe is that dc's will have to make their ai deeper so they were gonna limit it to casual. not sure how i misread that?

Originally posted by evileyez
Decent blitz defense .... Loooooooooool

give it up old guard. the cb is the god now. rolb is rip with you and jdros.

Originally posted by bhall43
huh? the gripe is that dc's will have to make their ai deeper so they were gonna limit it to casual. not sure how i misread that?

I still like the idea of reduced roster, pick x formations and y plays and build an identity. Not sure how to pull it off but I'd love to try it. Maybe in a single league or something

if they added all the formations and plays i made along with runs too i think that the pick x amount of plays for your book and create an identity idea would be truly awesome.

Originally posted by bhall43
its not a viable offense against any good dc. give it up.
It's funny that you say this when only one of us DCs.

Originally posted by bhall43
if they added all the formations and plays i made along with runs too i think that the pick x amount of plays for your book and create an identity idea would be truly awesome.
Of course it would be. It was my idea.

Originally posted by jdbolick

It's funny that you say this when only one of us DCs.

pretty sure im dc'ing. but im not sure why that is relevant to the statement.

Because the thing you're so sure invalidates 5WR doesn't actually exist anymore, which you would know if you DC-ed.

if it didnt invalidate the formation i would make a 5wr offense. fortunately i am not dumb enough to believe in ur fairytale.

Originally posted by bhall43
huh? the gripe is that dc's will have to make their ai deeper so they were gonna limit it to casual. not sure how i misread that?

I can't find the Catch quote, but it seemed like he was saying something about the tagging issue for casual... I had zero cares when I read it so I didn't think to follow up with Catch.

Originally posted by wherdigo
I'll give eyou a big bone.

NO HOMO, right? You're referring to a chicken bone?

Originally posted by Time Trial
I can't find the Catch quote, but it seemed like he was saying something about the tagging issue for casual... I had zero cares when I read it so I didn't think to follow up with Catch.

Yeah, new formations would suck in Casual. Hard to defend what is there now.

Originally posted by Time Trial
I can't find the Catch quote, but it seemed like he was saying something about the tagging issue for casual... I had zero cares when I read it so I didn't think to follow up with Catch.

yes the issue is because of tagging. wishbone, wing t, and power i all have more variables than currently what we have. dai's grow about another have a page from where they currently are...which is pretty fricken huge looking at mine.

Originally posted by bhall43
yes the issue is because of tagging. wishbone, wing t, and power i all have more variables than currently what we have. dai's grow about another have a page from where they currently are...which is pretty fricken huge looking at mine.
I can open mine, but I have to close firefox and restart it after I update, otherwise it hangs for ~15 minutes.