Warrior General Games

all strengths no weaknesses

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Apparently PK doesn't know how to quote just like he doesn't know what it's like to have great sex with a real woman.

Post removed by moderator.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
What the hell are you talking about?

jampy. his own network doesnt even like to keep him on their teams. they just pass him around and around.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Apparently PK doesn't know how to quote just like he doesn't know what it's like to have great sex with a real woman.

i quoted you to let him know you like unbalanced offenses and he went on to think you meant retarded builds.

i guess you two should be buddies. youre both morons.

Originally posted by jampysos
Post removed by moderator

we dont have that kind of technology here. try again plz.

End the insults and get this back on topic. only warning.

Taut has built more balanced builds than anyone and most all of them have performed pretty well, some very well. I think his D-line and TE's were probably his best as a balanced build. However most top WL dots these days are more or less extreme to some extent, and by that I mean they skimped on something to get more of something else.

Originally posted by Sellars
Taut has built more balanced builds than anyone and most all of them have performed pretty well, some very well. I think his D-line and TE's were probably his best as a balanced build. However most top WL dots these days are more or less extreme to some extent, and by that I mean they skimped on something to get more of something else.

Every dot skimps on something to get more of something else. That doesn't mean they are unbalanced.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Every dot skimps on something to get more of something else. That doesn't mean they are unbalanced.

Also really depends on what the team is looking for as far as skills and purpose of player.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Every dot skimps on something to get more of something else. That doesn't mean they are unbalanced.

By skimp I meant really skimped. A lot of DE's are ignoring VIS and taking TKL to low 70's to make them beast at pass rushing. Not all dots are like that but this is an example of what I meant in my other post.

Originally posted by Sellars
By skimp I meant really skimped. A lot of DE's are ignoring VIS and taking TKL to low 70's to make them beast at pass rushing. Not all dots are like that but this is an example of what I meant in my other post.

Ah. Can't say I've seen any DEs in WL that ignored vision. Then again, I don't focus on the Dline as much. Link to an example?

Your buddy JD has 2 who fit this bill perfectly And if i'm not mistaken DISA has a few DE's setup similar with VIS/TKL

Originally posted by Sellars
Your buddy JD has 2 who fit this bill perfectly And if i'm not mistaken DISA has a few DE's setup similar with VIS/TKL

I'm not sure I'd call 52 vision ignoring vision. It's certainly less than most DEs, but not ignoring it.

the most important is a good coach who sees the potential in my players and gives them an opportunity to shine and changes his tactics regularly to avoid mediocrity and find he teams strengths.

and gay rights

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Every dot skimps on something to get more of something else. That doesn't mean they are unbalanced.

I kinda agree with this. Just because you have 3 skills at, or above 100 natural, doesn't mean you don't have at least 2, 3, or 4 more between 60 and 90.

It would be better if the OP really would define what he considers skill number to be "overbearing". If he means skills above 150, then that really only is going to be one skill on the dot (have yet to see 2 skills above 150 on the same dot... not that it isn't possible, but that I'm guessing it wouldn't make for a very good dot). If he's talking about skills at or above 100 NATURAL, then many dots fit that description... even many with 3 skills at (or very nearly at) 100 natural.

If "balanced" means no skills above 100 natural, then there some of those... like some STOPS and some COMBO archetypes. They are useful and have a place on teams... but I really suspect most all dots are built with (at the VERY LEAST), one skill at, or above, 100 natural.