Originally posted by Pen15
he's saying you guys are inconsistent in endorsing using 2 or 3 break tackle SAs while realizing that one of those SA's success, the strongest one, makes the other SAs moot a large percentage of the time.
it's 1 SA and higher attributes, or 2-3 SAs and lower attributes, and frankly I'm also curious why the experts opt for the second choice given that no-SA broken tackles should also be a large percentage of any PB's broken tackles
Having Power Thru alone =/= the same success. You want every possible chance to break tackles in that tree. Now if you want to talk spin I would agree people overrate that SA for a power back as I have seen plenty of examples of PB's breaking more tackles without spin.
he's saying you guys are inconsistent in endorsing using 2 or 3 break tackle SAs while realizing that one of those SA's success, the strongest one, makes the other SAs moot a large percentage of the time.
it's 1 SA and higher attributes, or 2-3 SAs and lower attributes, and frankly I'm also curious why the experts opt for the second choice given that no-SA broken tackles should also be a large percentage of any PB's broken tackles
Having Power Thru alone =/= the same success. You want every possible chance to break tackles in that tree. Now if you want to talk spin I would agree people overrate that SA for a power back as I have seen plenty of examples of PB's breaking more tackles without spin.






























