INT numbers =! effectiveness NOT SO Smart
BrickHouse
offline
offline
Do you really want to compare players?
Blaqman
48 Tkl, 3 Mtkl, 2 TFL, 32 PD, 1 INT, 1 FR
He Hate Me
56 Tkl, 1 Mtkl, 5 TFL, 37 PD, 12 INT, 1 FF, 1 FR
Ok....so what's the argument here? Looks pretty cut and dry to me.
Blaqman
48 Tkl, 3 Mtkl, 2 TFL, 32 PD, 1 INT, 1 FR
He Hate Me
56 Tkl, 1 Mtkl, 5 TFL, 37 PD, 12 INT, 1 FF, 1 FR
Ok....so what's the argument here? Looks pretty cut and dry to me.
abdvash
offline
offline
Good predictions Brick. Too bad we had to get a visit from the ho's who also don't know how to read because it says Week 10 predictions west only. Apparently, they just need more attention
Keep up the good work with the predictons.. I love to read that in the sports section of the newspaper 
Keep up the good work with the predictons.. I love to read that in the sports section of the newspaper 
Last edited Jul 1, 2008 11:10:57
BrickHouse
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rambro.TW
did u read the last part of the original post?
The real question he was asking is....why did you?
did u read the last part of the original post?
The real question he was asking is....why did you?
BrickHouse
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rambro.TW
lol i guess reading comprehension isnt one of your strong suits NOTSO Smart
You can obviously tell the guy you are guarding is there if you have 48 tackles on the season. 4.8 a game vs 5.6 a game. I guess my guy isnt there either. Difference is, He Hate Me causes turnovers.
lol i guess reading comprehension isnt one of your strong suits NOTSO Smart
You can obviously tell the guy you are guarding is there if you have 48 tackles on the season. 4.8 a game vs 5.6 a game. I guess my guy isnt there either. Difference is, He Hate Me causes turnovers.
Falhawk
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rambro.TW
Originally posted by BrickHouse
Are you always this ignorant. Look at the depth chart. Juhl is more of a 'shutdown' corner than Blaqman. People don't throw his way.
Needless to say we'd put blaqman at 4th or 5th on the depth chart, I don't think he could handle the Western Conference, not as many powder puffs.
have u looked at our depth chart moron, I AM ALSO THE NUMBER ONE CB on THE TOP TEAM and have been all year except for one MAYBE two games...the one game i was moved to second cb i did have "numbers" that a faggot like urself craves so much
and judging from ur record ur team cant handle the western conference.......so what does that say about you ROD "NOT SO" SMART
you're the 3rd best CB on the team, almost 4th. I usually try to put you in a spot that gets less action so there's less of a chance you'll fuck up. I'll probably put you in the first spot next game too but that doesn't mean you're the best. The 3rd CB gets thrown at the most overall so I'll probably put a playmaker like shutdown corner or security blanket in that spot.
Originally posted by BrickHouse
Are you always this ignorant. Look at the depth chart. Juhl is more of a 'shutdown' corner than Blaqman. People don't throw his way.
Needless to say we'd put blaqman at 4th or 5th on the depth chart, I don't think he could handle the Western Conference, not as many powder puffs.
have u looked at our depth chart moron, I AM ALSO THE NUMBER ONE CB on THE TOP TEAM and have been all year except for one MAYBE two games...the one game i was moved to second cb i did have "numbers" that a faggot like urself craves so much
and judging from ur record ur team cant handle the western conference.......so what does that say about you ROD "NOT SO" SMART
you're the 3rd best CB on the team, almost 4th. I usually try to put you in a spot that gets less action so there's less of a chance you'll fuck up. I'll probably put you in the first spot next game too but that doesn't mean you're the best. The 3rd CB gets thrown at the most overall so I'll probably put a playmaker like shutdown corner or security blanket in that spot.
Rambro.TW
offline
offline
boy falhawk that sure doesnt make alot of sense......but ill let u run with it
Last edited Jul 1, 2008 12:12:42
BrickHouse
offline
offline
and the ignorant THINK they're great no matter what evidence is presented that proves differently.
Rambro.TW
offline
offline
what evidence HATH THOU GIVEN.................BRING IT FORTH
Last edited Jul 1, 2008 12:19:29
BrickHouse
offline
offline
Originally posted by BrickHouse
Do you really want to compare players?
Blaqman
48 Tkl, 3 Mtkl, 2 TFL, 32 PD, 1 INT, 1 FR
He Hate Me
56 Tkl, 1 Mtkl, 5 TFL, 37 PD, 12 INT, 1 FF, 1 FR
Ok....so what's the argument here? Looks pretty cut and dry to me.
What more do you want? It's obvious you've still seen a lot of action by your tackle and PD numbers. Yet you have 1 INT. If you're a shutdown CB.......then why are you tackles on par with the CBs that are leading the league in INTs yet you have none?
Do you really want to compare players?
Blaqman
48 Tkl, 3 Mtkl, 2 TFL, 32 PD, 1 INT, 1 FR
He Hate Me
56 Tkl, 1 Mtkl, 5 TFL, 37 PD, 12 INT, 1 FF, 1 FR
Ok....so what's the argument here? Looks pretty cut and dry to me.
What more do you want? It's obvious you've still seen a lot of action by your tackle and PD numbers. Yet you have 1 INT. If you're a shutdown CB.......then why are you tackles on par with the CBs that are leading the league in INTs yet you have none?
Rambro.TW
offline
offline
I ask for evidence AND YOU BRING ME STATS.......silly mortal
you cannot begin to quantify greatness with NUMBERS, thats like trying to guess Gods age....hahahahahaha HA? you come straight out of a comic book!
you cannot begin to quantify greatness with NUMBERS, thats like trying to guess Gods age....hahahahahaha HA? you come straight out of a comic book!
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.





























