Warrior General Games

Originally posted by CyberNinja
i just lost

You also only have 46 players unto which 10 of those are CPU players. Nothing to see here. Move on.

Originally posted by whodey08
You also only have 46 players unto which 10 of those are CPU players. Nothing to see here. Move on.

Was just about to post this. Terrible team is terrible.

Originally posted by whodey08


Nah, not yet. jdbolick needs a chance to destroy us all with LOGIC first.

Originally posted by Novus
No, you always declare I've been proven wrong... after sending me links to terribad human teams in non-Elite leagues.
Well see, that's the problem. You invent qualifiers to avoid admitting you were wrong, such as a couple of seasons ago when an undefeated human team lost to a CPU team that was 2-9 or something. You brushed that off and kept running your mouth because, according to you, any team not in an elite league sucks by definition and therefore it didn't actually prove you wrong.

Originally posted by jdbolick

Well see, that's the problem. You invent qualifiers to avoid admitting you were wrong, such as a couple of seasons ago when an undefeated human team lost to a CPU team that was 2-9 or something. You brushed that off and kept running your mouth because, according to you, any team not in an elite league sucks by definition and therefore it didn't actually prove you wrong.

My standard has not changed: find me a good human team that has ever lost to a CPU team.

Undefeated in a Competitive league means nothing. We've all seen those teams that bounce back and forth between dominating a Competitive league one season and getting their asses handed to them in Elite the next season.

Even being in Competitive means one of three things happened the prior season: 1.) they weren't even on the playoff bubble in Elite and demoted down, 2.) they were mediocre in Competitive and neither promoted nor demoted, or 3.) they made the playoffs in Regular as a low seed, lost in the first round and promoted up to Competitive but not up to Elite. And under no circumstances would I ever consider any such team to be good.

The only way you've ever "proven" me wrong on this is by stretching the definition of a "good team" well beyond recognition.

If I'm so obviously wrong, go find me an example of a good team losing to a CPU team, or GTFO.

Originally posted by jdbolick

Well see, that's the problem. You invent qualifiers to avoid admitting you were wrong, such as a couple of seasons ago when an undefeated human team lost to a CPU team that was 2-9 or something. You brushed that off and kept running your mouth because, according to you, any team not in an elite league sucks by definition and therefore it didn't actually prove you wrong.

That CPU team was 2-9 or something which means that 7 other teams were able to beat it doesn't it?

I have never lost to a CPU team ever

never ever

never ever ever never

not with a team I owned

not with a team somebody else owned that I had a dot on

not even on my absolute -0- cares casual team that had to play a punter at SS cuz we had only 42 dot roster and no SS's.

NEVER EVER EVER

not last season

not in season 15

NEVER

now watch my casual team lose to a CPU this season because I posted this

Originally posted by Novus
Nah, not yet. jdbolick needs a chance to destroy us all with LOGIC first.

Almost fell out of my chair. Lulz

Originally posted by Novus
My standard has not changed: find me a good human team that has ever lost to a CPU team.
We already did. Your consent has no effect on reality, which is fortunate given popular perception of your reasoning ability.

Originally posted by
Undefeated in a Competitive league means nothing.


Originally posted by
The only way you've ever "proven" me wrong on this is by stretching the definition of a "good team" well beyond recognition. If I'm so obviously wrong, go find me an example of a good team losing to a CPU team, or GTFO.
You're the one who keeps making the definition more and more narrow each time someone provides an example proving you wrong. And don't speak to me as if you've earned the right to consider yourself an equal. You should thank me simply for deigning to acknowledge your existence.


Originally posted by whodey08
That CPU team was 2-9 or something which means that 7 other teams were able to beat it doesn't it?
You obviously have absolutely no understanding of how CPU teams are scaled, or how that can lead to the funky results where good teams lose to them while terrible teams beat them convincingly. Here's a clue, junior: a CPU roster isn't given the same player builds for each game.

Originally posted by whodey08
I have never lost to a single CPU team. I still tag CPU players and use my regular AI and have NEVER lost to a CPU team.

Posts the lock emoticon then tries to participate...

1) Wow, you're so awesome for never having lost to a CPU team.
2) No one cares.

Originally posted by jdbolick

You obviously have absolutely no understanding of how CPU teams are scaled, or how that can lead to the funky results where good teams lose to them while terrible teams beat them convincingly. Here's a clue, junior: a CPU roster isn't given the same player builds for each game.

I understand they are scaled up and down based on the competition. The better your team the better the CPU dots you play against will be as well which is why you can't "assume" you will win. I will bet you anything they didn't bother to "tag" any of those CPU dots therefore the AI that is normally used was not used against the CPU team.

Bottom line is it has been shown over and over and over that if you treat a CPU team as a regular team than you don't lose. If I am just a "junior" and don't understand things than how is it that I have never lost to a CPU team?

Originally posted by qjam6

1) Wow, you're so awesome for never having lost to a CPU team.
2) No one cares.

This whole damn thread is about losing to CPU teams or not losing to CPU teams.

I beat my cpu team today

Originally posted by jdbolick

Well see, that's the problem. You invent qualifiers to avoid admitting you were wrong, such as a couple of seasons ago when an undefeated human team lost to a CPU team that was 2-9 or something. You brushed that off and kept running your mouth because, according to you, any team not in an elite league sucks by definition and therefore it didn't actually prove you wrong.

An undefeated mostly CPU team that beat 10 nearly CPU teams loses to a full CPU team.

Alert the presses.