nvm
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > Question about PW promotion
_OSIRIS_
offline
offline
That's pretty cheap to hang out in rookie and do that. It's certainly nothing to be proud of.
Dub J
offline
offline
I'm assuming it's people that were okay in PW but could never quite climb the hump so they figured they would come to regular and shoot fish in a barrel. What's funny is when two teams that do that end up in the same conference. Whoops, there goes the easy gold for one of them. lol
EDIT: Would love it if Bort added something in his league movement script that flagged teams that have demoted at least once in the last three seasons all in the same conference. I imagine by day 43 most of the teams in that conference would be CPU.
EDIT: Would love it if Bort added something in his league movement script that flagged teams that have demoted at least once in the last three seasons all in the same conference. I imagine by day 43 most of the teams in that conference would be CPU.
Edited by Dub J on Jan 20, 2013 16:55:25
Dub J
offline
offline
Twice I've picked up cheap gold trophies in PW Copper. I don't shy away from it. I didn't exploit or game any system, though. Just put together a competitive team in an extremely bad league.
_OSIRIS_
offline
offline
I picked up a cheap PW Copper trophy this season. My long time team was demoted all the way down after being filled with CPUs two straight seasons. I'm not proud of it, more ashamed. I had builds I wanted to test so I played it. It was certainly not fair for any newer players just trying to get their feet wet.I did not game plan for a single league or playoff game nor did I even watch one.
Dub J
offline
offline
I'm not proud nor ashamed of it. It is what it is.
The way I look at it is if I hadn't been in that league a pretty bad team that really doesn't deserve to have a gold trophy on their team page would have won it.
The way I look at it is if I hadn't been in that league a pretty bad team that really doesn't deserve to have a gold trophy on their team page would have won it.
Originally posted by whodey08
That's precisely what Jampysos and the Havasu Walking Dead team did and he just can't seem to understand that it was a cheap meaningless tainted title for them since they were a 1 and done team and rounded out builds and put skill points into SA's just to win a gold title in the rookie league. There is no respect for any team that does that. If they want to build like that than stay in peewee where you play other teams that also build that way.
Shut the hell up you freaking idiot.
I the freaking Team owner told you this himself.
WE BUILT FOR THE LONG TERM. The only rounded out builds were our recievers,
because we freaking used them unlike all the other fkers running the RQB like its the only dot they have.
No one gives a SHIT about your e-respect so you can shove it up you ass. We had BARELY any SAs, less then any copper team would own.
We freaking beat you in scrims, and we made you eat your pathetic stupid words by winning the gold. Now all you can do is show how freaking pathetic you are by now talking crap on the victory you and many others said WASN'T POSSIBLE.
That's precisely what Jampysos and the Havasu Walking Dead team did and he just can't seem to understand that it was a cheap meaningless tainted title for them since they were a 1 and done team and rounded out builds and put skill points into SA's just to win a gold title in the rookie league. There is no respect for any team that does that. If they want to build like that than stay in peewee where you play other teams that also build that way.
Shut the hell up you freaking idiot.
I the freaking Team owner told you this himself.
WE BUILT FOR THE LONG TERM. The only rounded out builds were our recievers,
because we freaking used them unlike all the other fkers running the RQB like its the only dot they have.
No one gives a SHIT about your e-respect so you can shove it up you ass. We had BARELY any SAs, less then any copper team would own.
We freaking beat you in scrims, and we made you eat your pathetic stupid words by winning the gold. Now all you can do is show how freaking pathetic you are by now talking crap on the victory you and many others said WASN'T POSSIBLE.
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by jampysos
WE BUILT FOR THE LONG TERM.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=5743
Season 32, Rookie League #3
League Champion
WE BUILT FOR THE LONG TERM.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=5743
Season 32, Rookie League #3
League Champion
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=5743
Season 32, Rookie League #3
League Champion
Yeah....they retired and rebuilt after 1 season. I think 40 days is long term where he comes from.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=5743
Season 32, Rookie League #3
League Champion
Yeah....they retired and rebuilt after 1 season. I think 40 days is long term where he comes from.
Originally posted by Dub J
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=5743
Season 32, Rookie League #3
League Champion
invalid argument,
you can build long term and reset after s1
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=5743
Season 32, Rookie League #3
League Champion
invalid argument,
you can build long term and reset after s1
Originally posted by Dub J
Invalid argument doesn't mean what you think it means.
An 'invalid argument' is an argument which cannot proceed to any logical or sensible conclusion because the premise of the argument as stated isn't based on real evidence or upon fact or reasonable judgement: an argument based on faulty reasoning to start with goes nowhere because any conclusion drawn, formed or agreed upon will itself necessarily be wrong.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_an_invalid_argument
Yes it does
Invalid argument doesn't mean what you think it means.
An 'invalid argument' is an argument which cannot proceed to any logical or sensible conclusion because the premise of the argument as stated isn't based on real evidence or upon fact or reasonable judgement: an argument based on faulty reasoning to start with goes nowhere because any conclusion drawn, formed or agreed upon will itself necessarily be wrong.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_an_invalid_argument
Yes it does
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by jampysos
WE BUILT FOR THE LONG TERM.
The only rounded out builds were our recievers because we freaking used them. We had BARELY any SAs, less then any copper team would own.
So you did have builds that were rounded out sooner than you would normally have rounded them out......why? Because you knew you were resetting after 1 season. You did put skill points into SA's. Why? Because you knew you were resetting after 1 season.
This is not "built for the long term" when you do things that you would not normally have done if you were not resetting after 1 season. Are you in complete denial?
WE BUILT FOR THE LONG TERM.
The only rounded out builds were our recievers because we freaking used them. We had BARELY any SAs, less then any copper team would own.
So you did have builds that were rounded out sooner than you would normally have rounded them out......why? Because you knew you were resetting after 1 season. You did put skill points into SA's. Why? Because you knew you were resetting after 1 season.
This is not "built for the long term" when you do things that you would not normally have done if you were not resetting after 1 season. Are you in complete denial?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
