User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > Update the descriptions for SAs and VAs
Page:
 
FBfan4life
offline
Link
 
+1 cause it is a good idea

+1000 cause it came from Dave, so it has to be a great idea
 
The Hitman
offline
Link
 
+1
 
montywop
offline
Link
 
YES!

+1
Edited by montywop on Jan 9, 2013 16:04:32
 
beersy
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by The Hitman
+1


 
Monty Burns
Crusty Old Fart
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by im4ut999
If there is any hope of new agents coming in and understanding anything easily, this type of simple documentation is a must...

+1


another +1

 
oaklandraider
OAK
offline
Link
 
+1

how difficult or time consuming could it possibly be to do this ?
 
tazmann
offline
Link
 
+1
 
boondocksaint
offline
Link
 
Yep.
 
dbreeze
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by oaklandraider
+1

how difficult or time consuming could it possibly be to do this ?


Originally posted by im4ut999
If there is any hope of new agents coming in and understanding anything easily, this type of simple documentation is a must...


y'all killin' me...... stop it.....
 
sliders
offline
Link
 
+1
 
Ayso
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Dave Mr Majors
I have seen innumerable threads that ask simple questions about whether or not a particular SA/VA works in a given situation.

Examples
Does Lead Block SA work on Special Teams or only on Offense?
Will Spot Blitz SA work for a G?
Does Aura of Intimidation only work on Defense?
Does ::insert VA:: work on Offense? Defense? Special Teams?

These questions pop up repeatedly and are usually a topic of conversation at every Q&A. I suggest that all SA and VA descriptions are updated to include the following:

1. Position limitations (i.e. Protector SA must be LOT)
2. Applies on - [x] Offense [x] Defense [x] Special Teams

I realize that there may be some redundancy involved in this process, but redundancy is preferable to the same questions being repeated over and over.


+1
 
Chysil
Mod
offline
Link
 
while I agree, I do believe that when the VAs came out Bort made a statement about liking the vagueness of the SA descriptions etc
 
cosmoxl
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Chysil
while I agree, I do believe that when the VAs came out Bort made a statement about liking the vagueness of the SA descriptions etc


but he usually answers questions about them so why be vague?

+1 to the suggestion
 
T2
Killuh
offline
Link
 
+1
 
bigdogdch
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Donk3yMan
Originally posted by Hagalaz

Would be a great start. A heavy +1!




 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.