Can we get some kind of ruling on this suggestion?
Forum > Suggestions > Add Pep Talk GM role
Originally posted by sehorn31
We can't even get an Asst. HC Title and you think your going to get this,lol?
Has way more impact than an Asst HC.
We can't even get an Asst. HC Title and you think your going to get this,lol?
Has way more impact than an Asst HC.
Idea: let "pep talk" GMs upload mp3 of actual voice doing a real pep talk ....then let Owners choose one for each game from the pool. The more your mp3 is used, the bigger the boost of the effect from the pep talk GM has for his own team.
Rule would be it would have to be GLB specific, flagged mp3s of uploaded youtube bullshit would mean a ban from being a pep talk GM.
Rule would be it would have to be GLB specific, flagged mp3s of uploaded youtube bullshit wou
ld mean a ban from being a pep talk GM.The way I would do it is to make the # of agents that respond to a pep talk factor into the power of the pep talk. This would discourage single builder/owner teams.
Say you have 55 agents that post, "Great speech." You get a +55 bonus or whatever. One builder teams would only get a +1. Thus ends the bitching about single builder/owner teams kicking everyone's ass. This means you tautology.
Amirite?
+1 the OP suggestion too.
Say you have 55 agents that post, "Great speech." You get a +55 bonus or whatever. One builder teams would only get a +1. Thus ends the bitching about single builder/owner teams kicking everyone's ass. This means you tautology.
Amirite?
+1 the OP suggestion too.
Originally posted by Ezra~cult~
The way I would do it is to make the # of agents that respond to a pep talk factor into the power of the pep talk. This would discourage single builder/owner teams.
Say you have 55 agents that post, "Great speech." You get a +55 bonus or whatever. One builder teams would only get a +1. Thus ends the bitching about single builder/owner teams kicking everyone's ass. This means you tautology.
Amirite?
+1 the OP suggestion too.
none of the stuff should equal any type of bonus for the players.
The way I would do it is to make the # of agents that respond to a pep talk factor into the power of the pep talk. This would discourage single builder/owner teams.
Say you have 55 agents that post, "Great speech." You get a +55 bonus or whatever. One builder teams would only get a +1. Thus ends the bitching about single builder/owner teams kicking everyone's ass. This means you tautology.
Amirite?
+1 the OP suggestion too.
none of the stuff should equal any type of bonus for the players.
JuniorMcSpiffy
offline
offline
Originally posted by hatchman
none of the stuff should equal any type of bonus for the players.
Then I guess you should find a different game... or build your own. Couldn't be any worse than this one.
none of the stuff should equal any type of bonus for the players.
Then I guess you should find a different game... or build your own. Couldn't be any worse than this one.
Originally posted by merenoise
Tell people how to assign VAs. And coordinate with the OC and DC on play time. And wear the nicest hat on the team, and if an old school guy the nicest suit.
all our HC does on wu is bitch about not being HC
Tell people how to assign VAs. And coordinate with the OC and DC on play time. And wear the nicest hat on the team, and if an old school guy the nicest suit.
all our HC does on wu is bitch about not being HC
Originally posted by Ezra~cult~
The way I would do it is to make the # of agents that respond to a pep talk factor into the power of the pep talk. This would discourage single builder/owner teams.
Say you have 55 agents that post, "Great speech." You get a +55 bonus or whatever. One builder teams would only get a +1. Thus ends the bitching about single builder/owner teams kicking everyone's ass. This means you tautology.
Amirite?
+1 the OP suggestion too.
pretty sure that is why they just beat us
his +55 from the pep talk and our +4
The way I would do it is to make the # of agents that respond to a pep talk factor into the power of the pep talk. This would discourage single builder/owner teams.
Say you have 55 agents that post, "Great speech." You get a +55 bonus or whatever. One builder teams would only get a +1. Thus ends the bitching about single builder/owner teams kicking everyone's ass. This means you tautology.
Amirite?
+1 the OP suggestion too.
pretty sure that is why they just beat us
his +55 from the pep talk and our +4
it could be interconnected to the number of hits on the forum that is labeled Pep Talk Game # X ...
Loco Moco
offline
offline
Originally posted by Thunder66
+1 to OP.
Could we also add a "Fluffer" gm.
Only if they also add the "Pivot Man" GM
+1 to OP.
Could we also add a "Fluffer" gm.
Only if they also add the "Pivot Man" GM
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
