Warrior General Games

Originally posted by aaasahi
Yes, so just tune up the chance to roll good piece, at least tune down the chance to roll the garbage.
Like a HB roll +make tackle chance, or a QB roll +avoid fake chance.

This just a discount on AEQ cost, and I see no logic in it.
You do not have to roll for the AEQ.

Originally posted by aaasahi
Are you serious?

completely. It'll add diversity between people who sacrifice build for EQ edge and those who'll sacrifice the 4th AEQ piece for a better build.

-1

Those of us who plan our builds ahead of time should be rewarded by being able to fit exactly the AEQ pieces we want on your dot. There's no reason to "even the playing field" by making 4AEQ suddenly an easy task for everyone.

I would rather see the price doubled so Agents would really have to decide what pieces they needed. It is fairly easy to get 4 fully upgraded pieces now. Double the price and 2 pieces would be the standard with 3 a possibility with more light training.

Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs
If you want/need more BTs train on light earlier. Problem solved.

This.
-1 to op.

Originally posted by ase
-1

Those of us who plan our builds ahead of time should be rewarded by being able to fit exactly the AEQ pieces we want on your dot. There's no reason to "even the playing field" by making 4AEQ suddenly an easy task for everyone.

Its not evening the playing field.

Its making it a PLAYING field, not a math quiz.

And you STILL get an advantage from being able to do your math, in that you will still optimize your training to suit whatever your personal goals are for AEQ and BTs for other purposes.

What it will give you and everyone is more choices. That's a plus in a game.

Because in games there should not be a "Right" answer followed by nothing but "wrong" ones. There should be numerous options to choose from.

Originally posted by yello1

Because in games there should not be a "Right" answer followed by nothing but "wrong" ones. There should be numerous options to choose from.


Just how dense are you? There will still be ONE "right" answer, followed by varying degrees of "wrong" ones. Those of you partaking in the "wrong" ones might feel better about yourselves, but the math crowd who took the "right" answer will have better builds.

Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader

Just how dense are you? There will still be ONE "right" answer, followed by varying degrees of "wrong" ones. Those of you partaking in the "wrong" ones might feel better about yourselves, but the math crowd who took the "right" answer will have better builds.



Don't bother trying to reason with him. He's proven over and over that he doesn't get it.

-1 to the OP

No need to argue. Was just a suggestion, not a bloodlust challenge.

A simple +1 or -1 will suffice.

-1

Originally posted by aaasahi
Originally posted by mandyross

There is no point to this suggestion - it is garbage.

Even if the cost of EQ upgrades is reduced, there will still be only one right answer and subsequent lack of choices. So this suggestion is meaningless.

Yes, so just tune up the chance to roll good piece, at least tune down the chance to roll the garbage.
Like a HB roll +make tackle chance, or a QB roll +avoid fake chance.

But that Avoid Fake Chance will help him when LBs are allowed to Fake Blitz in Season 48.

Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by ase

-1

Those of us who plan our builds ahead of time should be rewarded by being able to fit exactly the AEQ pieces we want on your dot. There's no reason to "even the playing field" by making 4AEQ suddenly an easy task for everyone.

Its not evening the playing field.

Its making it a PLAYING field, not a math quiz.

And you STILL get an advantage from being able to do your math, in that you will still optimize your training to suit whatever your personal goals are for AEQ and BTs for other purposes.

What it will give you and everyone is more choices. That's a plus in a game.

Because in games there should not be a "Right" answer followed by nothing but "wrong" ones. There should be numerous options to choose from.
No you are wrong really. If you make the BT price for AEQ 25, people will just train on multi longer then they do now and still have enough time to fill out for pieces of AEQ. That will be the new right answer, period, end of story. you knock it to 20 BT people will train on multi even longer and just have enough to get 4 AEQ. Again that will be the right idea.

It's a fricken math game and will continue to be a fricken math game, as long as you have to decide between training on multi to get the most out of training and having 4AEQ. Shine the turd however you want it's still going to be a turd.

fix the rolling.

Originally posted by NYJets52
fix the rolling.

It doesn't need fixing. Those "garbage" rolls you see are the games way of saying "Please try again". If every roll made sense, EVERYONE would roll rather than purchase their AEQ items.

maybe make the shopping price 2 tokens instead of three?