Originally posted by TaySC
Don't like this idea at all.
There is a reason a team has an owner and that the owner can set a co-owner (which should be mutual ownership of sorts), but 2 people are plenty.
-1
Don't like this idea at all.
There is a reason a team has an owner and that the owner can set a co-owner (which should be mutual ownership of sorts), but 2 people are plenty.
-1






























